Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/other/1425534-freedom-of-speech
https://studentshare.org/other/1425534-freedom-of-speech.
The law should not limit them from using the best tools available, which is what currently exists. This ban is not only discriminatory but unreasonable. It assumes that the persons involved in vandalism are under the age of 21. Further, it suggests that persons in that age group are not able to decipher what constitutes wholesome, responsible, and proper behavior from what does not. This ban is an act of suppression of the right to progress beyond limits placed by the authorities. It forces persons under the age of 21 to break laws that hinder their progress and prevent them from expressing themselves in a wholesome manner. In so doing it casts them in the light of being lawbreakers. It needlessly casts a level of guilt on that age group and reduces them to the level of criminals when they are not engaged in wrongdoing.
If freedom of speech is to remain the right of all this discriminatory and suppressive ban needs to be removed as it cuts at the core of creativity. The youths should not be made to pay in any way for societal problems such as that which caused the ban.
Read More