Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/other/1422091-summary
https://studentshare.org/other/1422091-summary.
It is believed, according to the authors, that more would be accomplished if the number of countries that used EPR increased. This is due to the fact that a correlation has been found between the number of countries using EPR and the amount of e-waste. The authors point out that EPR is the easiest route to take in cutting down on the amount of e-waste, as it does not involve government approval or government funds. As such, all countries should be able to implement similar inexpensive programs to help cut down on e-waste.
I feel that the authors not only made valid points, but they backed these points up with proof from Swiss EPR programs. They showed how easy it is to implement EPR programs in different countries and they discussed the vitalness of doing so in decreasing the amount of e-waste throughout the world. As people are becoming more environmentally friendly, and as easier and more affordable it has been to obtain electronic devices, such as cell phones and music players, people need to become more aware of what their e-waste is doing to the planet. This awareness needs to start with the manufacturers of these products.
The authors present a simple yet effective method of cutting down on the amount of e-waste. They provide ways to make sure that people do not skip out on paying and get all the benefits regardless; the system is virtually foolproof, just as long as the rules are followed accordingly. More or less, the EPR program is the needed tool to decrease e-waste in ways that can benefit everyone, making it easier to recycle these unneeded products. Read More