Retrieved de https://studentshare.org/other/1420370-political-economic-ideologies-the-nonprofit-sector
https://studentshare.org/other/1420370-political-economic-ideologies-the-nonprofit-sector.
At some point, the complex battle of these political parties complicates the deliberation and implementation of certain social and economic policies on practical grounds.
In this paper, an analysis of the three major political positions will be discussed; namely, the left, the right, and the centrist movements. Here, we can see how the political spectrum affects the government, the private sector, and the non-profit organizations in society as they try to give solutions to the problems of poverty and social welfare.
The Right
Conservatism, liberalism, libertarianism and nationalism are the common terms associated with the rightist movement. The right usually pertains to the Republicans in the United States as influenced by Nixon, Raegan, Goldwater, Gingrich, Mc Carthy and many others (Bell xii). The origin of this movement can be drawn back from the ideas of aristocracy and monarchism. In this perspective, the preservation of control in the government usually takes over the policies for economic and political strategies (Bell 56). Basically, the rightist position in economic policies gives more focus on the ‘free-market’ system (Bell 463) which consequently supported the growth of capitalism in the community. The way the rightist movement views poverty can be associated with their idea of solving it in terms of encouraging economic prosperity through the empowering free-market system. The rightists advocate the control (reduction) of taxes which they believe will be significant in economic development and therefore will improve economic income that can be used for the welfare of society.
The Left
In contrast with rightist ideology, the leftist leans towards the new social development perspectives different from the traditional conservative order. In the United States, the Democratic movement similarly reflects this kind of ideology. The strategic plan of the left usually focuses on civil rights acts and labor laws (Gosse 1). As an implication of this function, the leftist diagnosis of social problems more likely emphasizes the issues on the rights of the masses particularly the laborers and other ‘marginalized’ communities. The left prescribes economic policies in favor of intensive government intervention (Keynes 11); that is, in order to control the unbalanced development of the economic corporate community and the welfare of people. The left emphasizes that the roots and causes of poverty and other related problems are the capitalist conditions of the economic regime of the society; thus, the government should not focus on the free-market system.
The Centrist Movement
Ideally, a centrist political disposition is a somewhat combination of certain political and economic values coming from both the right and the left wings of the political spectrum. It stands in the middle of the two as concepts of integrative strategy are modified. The radical integration of the concepts such as social liberalism, progressive taxation, and civil and human rights is the synthesizing goal of the centrist movement (see americancentristparty.net). This political ideology is characterized by their advocacy to place society between liberalism and conservatism (Hill 1). Thus, in terms of their view on social problems, the centrist movement sees the importance of advancing corporate businesses as a source of economic income while equally emphasizing the need to protect the civil and labor rights of the people. Consequently, the solution that the centrist political movement offers is an integrative version drawn from the synthesis of the Left and the Right political ideologies.
The dynamic clash of different political ideologies in the spectrum of social and economic development frames the policies and programs carried by the government, market systems and other non-government organizations. The formation of civil societies, for instance, is also influenced by these political tangles in society (Cohen and Arato). As we can observe, the implication of the different perspectives used by each political party can be analyzed by looking at the different approaches and prescriptions such political ideologies offered. Through time, we can see how the development of societies is greatly affected chiefly by these political disputes.