Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/other/1417296-psychology
https://studentshare.org/other/1417296-psychology.
We were always clear with our recollection, but this 60 Minutes story proves just how wrong we can be when we are trying our best to be right.
I don’t believe that she was lying at all when she fingered the wrong man for the crime. For her, it was Mr. Cotton who raped her and she believed that with all of her conviction.
Our schema is such that once we think something, that memory tends to remain unchanged. Jennifer made her choice, and in the subsequent trial, was so sure Mr. Cotton was the rapist that she exhibited physiological symptoms that further accentuated her belief that he was the one.
I think this story shows that no matter how hard we try to get it right, our brains may have different ideas. We have a preconceived idea of how things should work and how things interact with each other in our world, and once we make a decision, we tend to believe in it, no matter who tries to change our minds. Unfortunately for Mr. Cotton, the jury having been told that Jennifer had positively identified him as her attacker was a further nail in his coffin. They believed that she hadn’t made any mistakes, and so their memory when they got back to the jury room was that he must be the one, he was identified as such. Not only did Jennifer have preconceived notions of her own, but she led others to believe that she was right in her choice, hence shaping their belief in his guilt. Thankfully he was vindicated, but it goes to show us that our memories alone can’t be taken as absolute fact; there is way more to it than just remembering a scenario, no matter how hard you try to remember it correctly.
Read More