Racial profiling--Overcoming the perception of racial profiling - Annotated Bibliography Example

Research s and the Annotated Bibliography Double –entry research log entry for “Special Report II: Racial profiling-overcoming the perception ofracial profiling” by Anonymous March 11, 2011 Anonymous,. "Special report II: Racial profiling-overcoming the perception of racial profiling." Law&Order 49.4 (2001): 94-101. Web. 11 Mar 2011. https://login.ezproxy.fiu.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/197229732?accountid=10901 Reading Notes -The initial line introduces this as a community relations issue.

-There is perception among the public that the police racially profiling, i.e. polls cited -Transitions directly into data collection approaches -transitions into lawsuits and new data collection methods -ends with the public opinion dismissed and data collection being promoted Strong Response Notes A good introduction given the title The polls showed that the public perception is largely negative Why the fast transition, is this a solid report? Another transition with no explanation or tie in to the papers stated purpose Seems to end to abruptly may need additional sources Annotated bibliography Anonymous,.

"Special report II: Racial profiling-overcoming the perception of racial profiling." Law&Order 49.4 (2001): 94-101. Web. 11 Mar 2011. https://login.ezproxy.fiu.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/197229732?accountid=10901 This report was specifically designed to raise the visibility of the problem of racial profiling, it was published in 2001. The report was designated for academics and professionals in the criminal justice arena. It was not meant to present a negative picture of police officers, but rather to raise awareness and show that race is disproportionately used in routine stops from traffic to pedestrian related stop and frisk’s.

One poll cited in the report found that 75% of Americans believe “racial profiling” is a problem. An additional poll cited by the author had a similar conclusion with regards to public opinion on the matter. The core argument however, did not seem to be related to the public polls but more the desire of the author to increase data collection. By linking the need for additional data collection and records for arrests the author presented a valid argument for additional methods of monitoring on duty police officers and further reducing ticket quotas.

One section in particular allowed me to better understand why these are valid requirements. Maryland State Police now receive training in the latest Fourth Amendment and Constitutional law procedures as a result of a racial profiling settlement. This will be a positive article to use as a result of the well sourced information. One point of possible interest that may call for additional research is the transition from the public polls to the need for data collection by law enforcement with no community action programs being offered as a way to show that the effort to reduce racial profiling is sincere.

There is also no direct approach to reducing the public perception outside of quoting the polls of public opinion. In my opinion additional sources will be required to assure the subject matter is properly covered and that the need for data collection in this paper is properly linked to and explains the public perception problems. Possibly more information on how to include the public in promoting additional programs, some of which were presented well towards the end but failed to show how they are benefiting the public only that they were being instituted.