The world is Flat - Essay Example

of Lecturer 4 March The World is Flat If one takes a look at Thomas Friedman’s arguments in the Dell Theory of Conflict Prevention and William Duiker’s arguments on globalization, it would be seen that Thomas Friedman is the most correct writer. The accuracy in the argument of Thomas Friedman shall be established in this paper. According to Thomas Friedman, “No two countries that are both part of a major global supply chain, like Dell's, will ever fight a war against each other as long as they are both part of the same global supply chain.” (421). This is actually true as no two countries would fight against each other if they have similar interests and it is only a clash of interests that would bring about conflict between these countries.

Countries like the United States of America and Great Britain have never really had any conflicts amongst themselves in recent years and the reason for this cannot be far-fetched. Over the years, the US has been an ally of Great Britain and it is not unusual that these two great countries have not had any reason to fight against each other. The reason is due to the fact that they are of the same global supply chain, thus corroborating Friedman’s argument that countries in the same global supply chain can never fight a war against each other.

You can never hear two developed countries that share the same ideology fighting against each other. In order to disproof Duiker’s belief that the trend toward globalization could lead to fragmentation, one should consider two countries that are thriving to be economically successful. The interests of these countries are aligned by the goals they share and this means that they are preoccupied with the success of their economy and would quell any crisis that could lead to conflict between them.

Furthermore, Dell’s opinion on conflict with China is very correct if one considers China’s level of technological development, there is no country that will be willing to have any sort of war or prolonged political upheaval against her if they want to benefit from their technological development. Any country that is interested in building its economy and making life better for its people would definitely prevent conflict against countries of the same global supply chain. Thus, globalization would not lead to fragmentation, but would lead to continuous co-operation between countries of the same global supply chain.

Thus, Thomas Friedman’s analysis on the Dell Theory of Conflict Prevention is correct and accurate, while William Duiker’s analysis lacks credence. Work Cited Friedman, Thomas. The World is Flat. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 2005