Emerging Technologies - Case Study Example

Consequently, this case study highlights the use of intelligent building capabilities, discuss its risks, and recommend how providers can secure this technology. Inclusion of intelligent building capabilities in medical premises In a journal article, Hlousek (2008) contend that intelligent buildings have the capability of responding to the needs of its occupants along with saving on cost and reducing ecological impact. This is one of the motivators that seen people install sensory devices into everyday objects they can place in offices to monitor and provide data about users.

The use of such technology has transformed how engineers design intelligent buildings, as pervasive technology continue to evolve over time. Currently, engineers can install various pervasive technologies in buildings such as CCTV cameras and wearable tags. These technologies help gather data about people in intelligent building, which can provide intelligence that can help providers deliver services to users (Moran & Nakata, 2010). The suitability of pervasive technology in proving gathering and transmitting data from users to receiving gadgets has paved way for the use of these technologies in various places.

For instance, some parents use these wearable tags to track their children while some buildings have CCTV cameras to monitor people entering and exiting a building. Risks associated with the technologies Pervasive technologies have proved essential in enabling intelligent building users with services. However, there are various risks associated with this emerging technology. The risks associated with pervasive technologies in intelligent building include user perception, privacy concerns, and accuracy, ownership and accessibility. a) Perception: The use of pervasive technologies raises risk on how people perceive these technologies.

In a medical environment, the installation of gadgets such as CCTV cameras can alter the behavior of physicians, as well as that of patients. Stress among users is one of the effects of surveillance technologies when users feel they are under observation (Moran & Nakata, 2010). This can affect the performance and behaviors of subjects. b) Privacy concerns: Monitoring technologies such as GPS products and wearable tags have privacy risks. In a work environment, users have concerns on what kind of information employers can gather about their employees (Michael, McNamee & Michael, 2006).

In addition, users question what kind of information a provider can view from subjects under surveillance. As a result, such technologies can infringe the privacy of the subjects they are observing. c) Accuracy of data: Increasing reliance of monitoring technologies bears a risk of inaccurate data, which can lead to negative outcomes. Given that, pervasive technologies have become essential in providing critical services; their accuracy is a subject of debate as erroneous data can lead to severe impact (Michael, McNamee & Michael, 2006).

For example, accidental data processing for GPS services can lead to negative outcomes because providers can make wrong decisions that have far-reaching effects on patients. d) Ownership of user data: Owners of pervasive tech