Main Research Findings: Application to Nursing Practice and Clinical Decision-Making - Essay Example

"Main Research Findings: Application to Nursing Practice and Clinical Decision-Making" is an engrossing example of a paper on care.
Clinical decision-making is a crucial constituent of nursing practice. It denotes the ability to examine and synthesize relevant information, as well as make decisions and correctly implement them within a clinical setting. Thus, it applies clinical reasoning in selecting the best possible evidenced-based alternatives to control risks and address the needs of patients in high-quality care for which the nurse is accountable. Nurses make regular clinical decisions that have an impact on the lives of patients. The quality of such decisions in nursing practice relies on the process to deliver good care. Therefore, clinical decision-making entails judgment, evidence, options, selection and accountability for the decisions made.

Blueman and Bousfield (2012) detail a number of findings regarding their study. One finding established that a potent bactericide is obtainable from the larvae, and demonstrated that exposure of 5-10 minutes to the bactericide is adequate to kill 100 per cent of bacteria. The application of control measure in this particular study improved the reliability of the outcome. However, this finding cannot apply to human practice. It is evident that the study utilized the unsterile technique for collecting the specimen. Using sound clinical decision-making, one can conclude that the research did not provide conclusive results. Thus, the findings are not applicable to a clinical setting.

Overall, this synthesis by Blueman and Bousfield (2012) reveals solid evidence for the bactericidal properties of Lucilia sericata larvae in mitigating the bacterial load in chronically infected wounds. These findings, as outlined in the study by Blueman and Bousfield, present evidence that posits the need to incorporate larval debridement therapy in nursing practice for the treatment of chronically infected wounds. This kind of judgment needs to recognize and acknowledge the limitations of the study while making sound clinical decisions. Prior to making the decisions, further critical analysis of the evidence is necessary. This needs to include a clinical audit and support research within the clinical practice.

Rafter (2013) points out the beneficial effects of the application of larval therapy in the treatment of chronically infected wounds by citing evidence available from the scientific literature. The findings of Rafter’s study illustrate the effectiveness of larval therapy in the treatment of chronically infected wounds. Additionally, the outcome of the study indicates an improvement in the debridement of necrotic tissues. As identified in the findings, the nurses need to consider the beneficial aspect of using larval therapy for proper chronic wound management within a community. Arriving at such sound clinical decisions regarding Rafter’s study demands an appropriate evaluation of the claimed benefits and corroboration with evidence.

Clinical decision-making is often both an effective problem-solving and cognitive activity, which focuses on defining any concern of the patient while selecting a suitable intervention. As pointed by Richardson (2004), a comparative analysis is critical to suggest a better option between conventional methods and larval therapy in the treatment of chronically infected wounds. This allows for a sound judgment prior to implementing evidence within a clinical setting. The findings of Richardson illustrate the sustainability of larval therapy in the management of chronically infected wounds. Therefore, the nurse can make a sound judgment to apply this kind of therapy to a clinical setting.