Marlaine Smiths Unitary Caring Theory - Essay Example

The Marlaine Smith’s Unitary Caring Theory: Analysis, and Evaluation The Marlaine Smith’s Unitary Caring Theory: Description, Analysis, and Evaluation Theory Description What is the purpose of the theory? (describe, explain, predict, prescribe) In the mid 1900’s, comfort was thought to be an objective for both nursing and pharmaceutical, as it was accepted that it prompted recuperation. Over the long run comfort has turned into an inexorably minor focus, occasionally it has been reserved for patients with no further accessible restorative treatment alternatives. What is the scope or level of the theory? (grand, middle range, practice) The Unitary Caring Theory is a middle range theory that is a humanistic, holistic, patient need based nursing. The Unitary Caring Theory is a humanistic, comprehensive, and emphasizes the need of patient nursing and is a middle range hypothesis. The idea of comfort has a historic significance and presence in nursing. What are the major concepts? Is the context for use described? Unitary Caring is also characterized as a way that one is capable of being helped from a misery; to calm in distress or pain; an individual or thing that solaces; a condition of simplicity and calm delight free from stress; anything that makes life simple; and the decreasing of wretchedness or sorrow by cooling or motivating with trust. In view of the assorted qualities of this term solace is a complex term. Marlaine Smith’s idea investigation of solace served to elucidate the part of solace as an all-encompassing idea for nursing. This audit affirmed that solace is a positive idea and is connected with exercises that sustain and reinforce patients (Fawcett & DeSanto-Madeya, 2013). Over a time of years and corrections Marlaine Smith built up the solace hypothesis which keeps on developing and changing over the years. Theory Analysis Are the concepts theoretically and operationally defined? When analyzing and evaluating this theory, it is vital to consider a number of factors such as the substantive foundation, functional adequacy and structural integrity. These factors are applicable and useful when utilizing the Smith and Liehr’s Framework as a tool for the evaluation of Middle Range Theories as demonstrated hereunder. Assessing the substantive establishment of a middle range hypothesis is taking into account four criteria. The primary rule assesses whether the hypothesis is at the heart of the discipline of nursing. The comfort hypothesis effectively addresses four ideas involving the metaparadigm of nursing, characterizing the ideas as they compare to the hypothesis and in addition introduces an outline of how the Unitary Caring Theory relates hypothetically to other nursing ideas (Alligood, 2014). Nursing is portrayed as the methodology of surveying the quiet’s solace needs, creating and executing fitting nursing intercessions, and assessing patient care after nursing mediations. The concept is operationalized because an individual is portrayed as the beneficiary of nursing care, which may be an individual, family, organization, or group. The environment is thought to be the outside surroundings of the patient and can be controlled to expand patient solace. The unitary Caring hypothesis is at the center reach level in that is characterized in a measurable manner and can be operationalized in both research and practice settings (Fawcett & DeSanto-Madeya, 2013). Is the theory logically organized? The theory is logical because eventually, well-being is seen as the ideal working of the patient as they characterize it (Fawcett & DeSanto-Madeya, 2013). The capacity of the structure to recommend mediation that helps nursing intercessions to expand underpins the discipline of nursing, and in doing as such meeting the first criteria. The second rule assesses whether the suppositions are determined and compatible with the core interest. The four suspicions in the Comfort Theory are unequivocally expressed thus meet the second criteria. Solace hypothesis accept that people creatures have all encompassing reactions to complex jolts; solace is an alluring comprehensive express that is apropos to the control of nursing; individuals effectively endeavor to meet, or to have met, their fundamental solace needs, and that solace are more than the nonappearance of agony, nervousness, and other physical inconveniences. Since the Unitary Caring Theory significantly portrays the idea of solace at the center extent level of talk, the third basis of the substantive establishment is met. The idea of Marlaine Smith examines solace served to clear up the part of comfort as a comprehensive idea for nursing. This survey affirmed that comfort theory presents a positive idea and is connected with exercises that support and fortify patients. Is there a model/diagram? Does the model contribute to clarifying the theory? Unitary Caring Theory gives a fantastic depiction, clarification, and understanding of the solace idea in different spaces and practice settings. Theory Evaluation Is the theory congruent with current nursing standards? Concerning functional adequacy, the criterion for this concept overlaps the five criteria that should be discussed collectively. The five paradigms include: hypothesis can be connected to an assortment of practical situations and customers; distributed samples exist of examination and hypothesis by and by; exact pointers have been recognized; and that the hypothesis has advanced through insightful request. The Unitary Caring Theory effortlessly meets these criterion. For instance, the Unitary Caring Theory has been utilized broadly as a part of various explorations by and by settings and patient and family populaces (Rogers, 1970). Is the theory congruent with current nursing interventions or therapeutics? Has the theory been tested empirically? Is it supported by research? Does it appear to be accurate/valid? Most of late researches have been utilizing the hypothesis as a part of practice has extended to bolster institutional nursing gratitude and solace in the nursing workplace. In each of the populaces said over a psychometric solace instrument has been produced as observational markers of ideas in the hypothesis. Then again, the observational pointers augment past induction and some incorporate observations, reports toward oneself, discernible practices and natural markers. The Unitary Caring Theory has likewise been amended with the most recent correction in 2007 (Rogers, 1980). The exact sufficiency of the Unitary Caring Theory is proof of the development of this hypothesis. Is the theory socially relevant? The Unitary Caring Theory has been utilized as a part of various practice and exploration settings to give a system where patients have solace needs and improving their solace is esteemed. It has additionally been utilized to upgrade working situations, particularly for medical attendants, and most as of late as a system for progressing in the direction of national institutional results (Rogers, 1990). Is the theory relevant cross-culturally? Despite the fact that the Unitary Caring Theory has been utilized most generally with patients and families toward the end of life and encompassing comprehensive palliative consideration in nursing intercessions, there has been an expansive use of the hypothesis in different populaces also incorporating moms in the process of childbirth, pediatric emergency unit and families, patients on bed rest, Alzheimer patients, those experiencing radiation treatment and for newborn children solace and torment (Smith, 2008). Does the theory contribute to the discipline of nursing? In terms of structural respectability is that ideas inside the hypothesis are at the center extent level of deliberation. The ideas of the Unitary Caring Theory-solace needs, comfort mediation, interceding variables, improved solace, well-being looking for practices, and institutional uprightness are close to the same level on the step of reflection at the center extent level (Smith, 2008). They are more concrete on the grounds that they can and have been operational and useful since it has also been measured. With regard to of structural integrity is that there are no a greater number of ideas than expected to clarify the phenomena. In general, the ideas, clarify the phenomena of solace or comfort. The hypothesis are integrated and sorted out in a basic way. Ultimately, the fourth paradigm assesses whether the ideas and connections between the ideas are legitimately given a model. In the Unitary Caring model, the thoughts are incorporated to make a comprehension of the entire marvel of solace in a model (Smith, 2008). The Unitary Caring Theory (1994) model is an incredible case of displaying the ideas and articulations in a straight coherent arrange so the valuation for the hypothesis can be perceived. What are implications for nursing practice? The Marlaine Smith’s Unitary Caring Theory is a decently characterized and decently tried hypothesis. Its quality lies in the versatility, flexibility, and testability of the ideas presented by Smith. The Unitary Caring hypothesis unmistakably characterize the ideas in the hypothesis and the relationship between these ideologies as they play an integral role in the nursing sector. Since the Unitary Caring hypothesis meet a large portion of the substantive establishments, structural trustworthiness, and practical sufficiency criteria the Unitary Caring Theory is a solid middle range hypothesis. A zone that could expand the generalization particularly for nursing foundations is a change in the term in the model of “nursing mediation” to “caring for the patients.” References Alligood, M. R. (2014). Nursing theorists and their work. St. Louis, Missouri : Elsevier Publishers. Fawcett, J., & DeSanto-Madeya, S. (2013). Contemporary nursing knowledge: Analysis and evaluation of nursing models and theories (3rd ed.). Philadephia: F. A. Davis. Rogers, M.E. (1970). An introduction to the theoretical basis of nursing. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis. Rogers, M.E. (1980). Nursing: A science of unitary man. In J.P. Riehl & C. Roy, Conceptual models for nursing practice (2nd ed., pp. 329-337). New York: Appleton- Century-Crofts. Rogers, M.E. (1990). Nursing: Science of unitary, irreducible, human beings: Update 1990. In E.A.M. Barrett (Ed.), Visions of Rogers science‑based nursing (pp. 5–11). New York: National League for Nursing. Smith, M., C. (2008). Evaluation of Middle Range Theories for the Discipline of Nursing. In Smith, Mary Jane and Liehr, Patricia R. (Eds.). Middle Range Theory for Nursing 2cd ed. (pp.293-306). New York: Springer Publishing Co. Read More