Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Go to advanced search...
Nobody downloaded yet

The Bolam Test of Negligence - Coursework Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
The paper "The Bolam Test of Negligence" states that more fundamental shift away from negligence would support disclosure of troubles with explicit measures and the sharing of information within practices and hospitals, and conceivably more extensively regarding the expansion of new, better systems…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.1% of users find it useful
The Bolam Test of Negligence
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "The Bolam Test of Negligence"

Download file to see previous pages The realistic effect of the test is that a judge will heed substantiation from experts in the suitable speciality and should decide whether the measures of the doctor/midwife/nurse etc. were appropriate. Frequently there are numerous acceptable ways of doing somewhat and conformity with any of these will mean that there was no breach of duty of care. Logically experts frequently disagree over these matters and the judge should decide whose substantiation is to be favored.
Professional men and women are administrated by the standard of care of a normal person of their profession or specialism: the test is the standard of the normal skilled man exercising and admitting to having that special skill. An expansion of this is the so-called Bolam test, by virtue of which an expert person is vindicated if he can show that his practice accorded with a considerable and respectable body of opinion in his field. Thus, he is not accountable for negligence if he has acted in agreement with a practice established as proper by an accountable body of medical men skilled in that particular art. Conversely, putting it the other way round, a man is not negligent if he is acting in agreement with such a practice, just because there is a body of opinion who would take differing views. The particulars of Bolam exemplify this: medical opinion at the time was alienated on the practice of managing electro-convulsive therapy devoid of physically restrictive the patient, and proof suggested that there were risks either way.
A significant aspect of the Bolam test is that the court will not anticipate the defendant to have projected future developments in facts or practice: he will be judged by the state of understanding of the normal professional at the time of the supposed tort. This was illustrated in Roe v. Ministry of Health. Every one of the plaintiffs was paralyzed while a polluted anaesthetic was managed to them in the course of an operation. ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(The Bolam Test of Negligence Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words, n.d.)
The Bolam Test of Negligence Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words.
(The Bolam Test of Negligence Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
The Bolam Test of Negligence Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words.
“The Bolam Test of Negligence Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Bolam Test of Negligence

Negligence Manslaughter

The researcher states that murder is an ideal example of a case under criminal law as it is a crime that affects the interest of the public. The laws ensure that there is equality among individuals and the public in general. It prevents the public from negligence, thus facilitating responsibility. Criminal law is distinctive for uniquely serious potential sanctions and consequences for failure to respect its provisions and rules. All crimes have criminal elements, but the difference comes in when one evaluate the magnitude of each crime. An ideal example is capital punishment, which entail the jurisdiction of the most serious crimes. Some criminal offences lead to corporal punishment, and the resultant punishment is whipping or ca...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Negligence Paper

...? Negligence Given a definite scenario, the aims of the essay are to address the following concerns to differentiate between negligence, gross negligence, and malpractice. Based on the information, decide if one agrees with the statement in given scenario; (2) to describe the importance of documentation (relating to the given simulation) and its correlation to potential negligence. Specifically, the following questions would be answered: (a) if you were the nurse in this situation, what ethical principles would guide your practice? And (b) how would you document the case to satisfy ethical and legal requirements? Negligence Background based on the Scenario The facts from the given scenario indicate the case of a 62 year old, diabetic...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Forensic test

... B 11 C 21 C 31 A 41 D 2 D 12 B 22 E 32 D 42 D 3 C 13 C 23 B 33 B 43 B 4 D 14 A 24 C 34 C 44 D 5 D 15 E 25 A 35 A 45 A 6A 16 A 26 E 36 E 46 A 7 C 17 D 27 A 37 D 47 B 8 A 18 A 28 B 38 B 48 E 9 E 19 A 29 A 39 E 49 B 10 C 20 A 30 A 40 C 50 B Question one Characteristics of an ideal forensic test According to (Gunn, 2011) an ideal forensic test should be accurate because the results will be highly scrutinized in court therefore it cannot afford to be inaccurate. Accuracy also helps to avoid disputes. Another characteristic associated with an ideal forensic test is the sensitivity. Many forensic materials collected are usually small and minute and therefore a more sensitive test is reliable. A forensic test should also be specific to avoid...
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment


...? Negligence Negligence The case “Failure to Restrain Caused Patient Fall” is selected for analysis and determination whether there was medical negligence or not and the events leading to the legal litigation by the patient. The description of the patient in the case illustrates that the patient was drowsy and nauseated after the surgery which would have warranted proper care by the X-ray technician during the procedure of post surgery X-ray. Admittedly, the technician did not make a point of securing the patient by the use of restraint straps on the X-ray chair. Even though it is argued that the restraint straps would not have sufficiently secured the plaintiff to the X-ray chair, it is evident that the efforts of the technician in caring...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay


...? Negligence of Introduction Records and reports indicate that more nurses are being sued for malpractice by theday. In fact, this trend, most evident in the last decade, is expected to increase given that there have been no indications of the signs disappearing. These signs persist despite the tremendous efforts of nursing educators, trainers and campaigners to inform practicing and student nurses about their personal, legal and professional responsibilities and limitations (Phillips et al., 2004). Quite apparent in these campaigns, education, training is the distinction among malpractice, negligence, and gross negligence. This paper explores the differences among negligence, gross negligence, and malpractice. In addition, the paper...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Medical Negligence

...Introduction Negligence in law means the failure to do some act which a reasonable man in the circumstances would do, or doing some act which a reasonable man in the circumstances would not do. A cause of action would only arise if as a consequence of negligence, injury to another person results. It has been held that to judge a person by his conduct in relation to another is guided by the conduct of a man on top of a Clapham omnibus. However, if a situation involves the employment of some special skill then the test to be used in judging that conduct is the standard of the ordinary skilled man exercising and professing to have that special skill. A man need not possess the highest skill at the risk of being found negligent. 1...
8 Pages(2000 words)Case Study

T-Test and Chi-Test

...T-Test and Chi-Test Unit 3 In the T-Test, the first hypothesis is expected that the mean of tenures between 1 and 2 will be similar. But a found out its different and that difference is very significant. In which in this kind of Test we determine the difference or the varying relationship to each other. The total number of compromising group 1 is equal to N1=120. The mean is equal to 1.47 while the variance is equal to 0.4989. While: The total number of members in group 2 is N2=186. The mean is equal to 1.67 while the variance is equal to 0.649. Therefore in the given hypothesis the only inference that can only be made suggests is that the difference between the two means is fairly and statistically significant. In the Chi-Square...
2 Pages(500 words)Assignment

DRVVT test

...DRVVT test Lab Report Questions Immunological method for measuring lupus anticoagulants Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT) is an immunological method for measuring lupus anticoagulants. In this method, reagents consisting of a platelet phospholipid, an activator, and calcium are added to a sample containing platelet poor plasma and then the time taken to form a clot is recorded. The aPTT is usually the duration it takes from when calcium is added to the formation of a clot. The nature of antibody is an Antiphospholipid antibody. 2. Lack of positive antibodies in sample C The absence of positive antibodies in sample C means that lupus anticoagulants were not present in the blood thus blood clotting could not occur. This means...
2 Pages(500 words)Lab Report


...Negligence Negligence A tort is a civil act or omission comprising a wrong against individuals instead of the The individuals could include legal entities such as corporate institutions and companies. The underlying principle of tort law is that an individual has some interests that are protected by the law. The protection can be in the form of court orders to the defendant to refrain from carrying out offensive acts or omissions, or the plaintiff being awarded a prescribed amount of money when a protected interest is infringed. The damage or harm must be the result of the defendant’s fault and at the same time legally recognised as attracting liability. In the context of negligence, tort law is more concerned with the harm that results...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Coursework on topic The Bolam Test of Negligence for FREE!

Contact Us