Retrieved de https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1665933-arthistory-paper
https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1665933-arthistory-paper.
A practical case and instance are the zoot suits which were worn by the servicemen of African-American origin in protest to the white domination and racial discrimination. Similarly, people who lived in similar localities and geographical regions had their social destinies bound together.
Thus, in any case, if there was any change and shift from the popular culture, then people in the same area moved together in that respect. For instance, when fabrics and punks hit the ghettos, it was the in thing and every person who wanted to show solidarity with the masses blended with the culture. In retrospect, oppositional dressing relates to subculture in that, it was part of a behavioral or sectoral pattern of behavior within the large cultural spectrum. This is to say that the people who blended with the opposition dress shared similar culture, and the oppositional dress code that they adopted was just a part of the culture in terms of dressing.
Question 2The term, notion, and concept of dandyism refers to a culture where a human being places a lot of attention and weight on the physical and outward appearance. This is to say that the person would take a lot of time and resources to ensure that he or she appears nonchalant at the very least. In most instances and cases, dandyism was a cloud word used to discuss how the men stressed their masculine principles to try to imitate the aristocrats. This is to say that a man would use refined language, and often engage in leisure activities that are conventionally regarded as royal or aristocratic.
In the period of the early 19th century, a dandy was a person who was self-made and strived hard to fit into the highest class of the society, (Wilson, 112). This was done regardless of the fact that the man belonged to the middle class of human social stratification. It was as if one aimed to be societally considered royal or of high standards and class despite the fact that he did not actually belong there. In the 20th century, there was a clamor and struggle for equal respect for all men or people within human society regardless of any varied backgrounds.
For instance, all men of all races, creeds, tribes, religions, and political affiliations are accorded the same respect as a royal person would be. This is the reason why the meaning and implication of dandyism actually changed in the twentieth century relative to the nineteenth century. All people regardless of social class imitate royalty in their mode of dressing or language perspective.
Read More