Tantrism in Buddhism and Hinduism - Essay Example

Tantrism is associated with the religious scriptures known as the Goddess Shakti. She is the sacred feminine in the Hindu religion, whom people worship. Hindus consider it anti-vedic in character. In Hinduism traditionally contains four parts; Metaphysical knowledge of religion known as Jnana, meditative practices known as yoga, ritual practices, and religious and ethical practices of conduct named Charya. Today in Hinduism this yoga traditionally exists in Saurya, Shiva, Shakta, Ganapatya, and Vaishnava. Tantrism came into being in Buddhism around the 3rd century till the 12th.

In Buddhism, Tantric is also known as Vajrayana. It is different in Buddhism because of its rituals. Rather than meditation, their goal is to achieve the Godhead, with Upaya/skills. Vajrayana is more complicated than Hinduism because of its rules and complications in language and reading. It is performed in Buddhism for the followers to experience the true Buddha nature before they tend to achieve enlightenment(Dolls of India - The Role of Tantra in Hinduism and Buddhism)

In the psychological study of religion, considering postmodernity, Erickson has given very much importance to religion in every stage of life. He has done biographies of Gandhi and Martin Luther, which have proved his thoughts on the matter of religion. Erick stated that for human personality development, religion plays an important role because it is the only primary way where virtues are promoted at each stage of life, based on culture. Erick’s theory couldn’t attain much benefit from systematic empirical study but it left an influential effect on human minds(Schachter).

Whereas considering postmodernity Jones states that today the world is moving within the new sets of modernity. The thoughts of people are changing as a strong reflection of modern themes, especially the youth ministry. Jones says that youth ministry should start looking at the Bible. He says that youth ministry should be careful considering the culture. He says that people are looking at the world with modern eyes, so we should understand the aspects of the modern world. Jones has observed that today modernity has made everything easily available for the people, but religiously the choices are overwhelming. According to Jones, philosophy questions the traditional assumptions about identity and truth. Both authors have different philosophies regarding postmodernity. Staying with religion is correct as per Erick, but Jones also has got a strong point. Yes, the world is changing and we should move along according to the new modern world. (R. Scott Smith)

Today the acceleration of world religion is at its peak on day to day basis. It is a good thing that the world is progressing, discovering and inventing new dilemmas. But the world is also changing the religious facts along with it, which is quite an unacceptable thing. We can change the world as it’s in our hands, but we aren’t worthy of making the changes in religion, which is already being set for ages by Almighty God. I will get along with the new inventions of technologies by keeping the religion, cultures, and traditions with me. I will deny the progression of unhealthy changes in the world religion. Read More