Wayne Williams Assessment - Research Paper Example

Wayne Williams Assessment Wayne Williams Assessment Historically, the Wayne Bertram William’s case received a lot of publi andattention as a result of the rare nature of the trials and convictions. It is important to understand the varied aspects of the case that may have contributed to the sentencing of Wayne. This is with extreme measures to understanding the use of fiber evidence, and its implications in the Wayne murder cases (Baldwin, 1985). There is a high probability that Cheryl Johnson, the scouted talent by Wayne did not exist.

This could be a potential reason why when Cheryl’s number was tried immediately after his arrest, it could not be traced. The route taken by the accused could be a human rights preference, and it is also highly probable that he took that route to dump the body of one of his murder victims. The taunts that Wayne directed at the investigators cannot be overlooked as they could have two implications to the case. The investigations were slated at a time when race related matters were at an all time high.

This could mean that Wayne was reacting to the maltreatment that he received which was a direct result of his race. On the other hand, it could be that he was highly corky and overconfident because he knew that there was no evidence that would eventually link him to the murders (Deadman, 1982). This paper will support the conclusion that Wayne Williams was guilty in the murder of some of the victims, as an outcome of fiber evidence analysis and linkage. Despite all the numerous challenges in the provision of evidence, in the above stated claims, there are certain aspects of the case that remain hazy.

It is not possible for Wayne to claim that he was travelling to scout and recruit Cheryl Johnson, who could not be traced. There is no existing evidence that shows that they had previously communicated or even agreed to meet on the said date. Evidence that was gathered from his home intimated that he had taken time to acclimatize himself on the procedures to follow when trying to beat a polygraph test. It is a result of non-binding evidence that the prosecutors thought it prudent to rely on fiber evidence (Deadman, 1982).

It is prudent to note that fiber evidence has contributed greatly in drawing resolute conclusions in criminology. The process, analysis, correlation and merging of fibers has the capacity of solving mysteries that would have otherwise remain unresolved. In the case of Wayne, the fibers processed and analyzed from the murdered victims were of a rare kind (Ramsland, 1991). However, investigators were able to determine the carpet manufacturer who provided additional information on the carpet’s essential components, the total number sold and how widespread the sale of the carpets had gone.

Evidence collected showed that the probability of this carpet being in any other house, other than Wayne’s, would be a 1% chance. The summation of the case showed the uncommon nature of the fibers collected, and their linkage to the murder victims, directly implicating the accused (Ramsland, 1991). It means that if Wayne did not know the accused, or ever interacted with them, then fibers found on them that were direct linkage to his home and car environment, would be non-existent. In conclusion, the use of fiber evidence shows that Wayne was guilty of some of the murders before the court as a direct result of the probability ratios of fibers collected on the murder victims, and those in his home and car.

References Baldwin, J. (1985). The evidence of things not seen. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Deadman, H. A. (1982). Fiber evidence and the Wayne Williams trial. Atlanta: Free Press.Ramsland, K. (1991). Trace evidence: Fibers and probability theory. Retrieved from Saferstein, A. (2004). Criminalistics: An introduction to Forensic Science. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.