Critical Reading Analysis - Essay Example

On the other hand, it leads the reader to consider the knowledge that had been known to shape Morse’s telegraph. And this eventually drives them to question who should be credited for that.

It could be concluded that this paper is more analytical than argumentative, leaving the judgment to the reader. It is in a non-rational mode, analyzing two stands.

The paper has two thesis statements. One is that society should accept Samuel Morse’s declaration of his invention of the telegraph. And the second is shared credit should be given to his predecessors paving the road for long-distance communication.

The thesis was clearly stated. Arguments to support both stands were presented but it was not balanced. The latter side was more substantiated, failing to lay down stronger arguments on why society should accept Morse’s claim.

The writer could have discussed how Morse came up with the invention from his artistic background: how Morse had this device of his design and how he developed this telegraph despite lacking the technical knowledge. The writer could also answer the question regarding what inspires him to do this demonstration.

The writer had a good choice of information that was helpful to the development of the paper but it should improve the opposition of the two stands.

The outline was strategic and logical. The opening statements claim how important the telegraph is, arousing the reader’s interest. The valuable contribution of Morse’s predecessors, especially Chappe’s was explained. It was written clearly, and because of the absence of jargon, it could be easily understood. The statement about how the telegraph changed society is very necessary. However, the distinctness of Morse’s telegraph could be explained further.

Two strong oppositions have more potential to employ sound reasoning. To arrive at a good judgment, the reader must be provided with complete history.

Nevertheless, the research paper was well written.