Nobody downloaded yet

Business Law - brief case using FIRAC method. and more - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
The heirs of the accident victims sued Union Pacific for maintaining the crossing, negligently. Patrick Duncan was one of the victims who died at a railroad crossing. Union…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.5% of users find it useful
Business Law - brief case using FIRAC method. and more
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Business Law - brief case using FIRAC method. and more"

Download file to see previous pages Therefore, a person is considered liable for negligence if he or she has departed or violates the conduct which is expected of a “reasonably prudent person” who is acting under the same circumstance (Buswell 41).
In the case of Duncan vs. Union Pacific, the court sought to establish whether there was negligence on the part of the Union Pacific, and particular how its train was operated. The court found out that there was no evidence to show that the train was operated negligently, and that its warning bells, whistles, and headlight were well activated before approaching the crossing. Paul Kleinman, the operator of the train had seen the car approaching but he believed it would stop. However, the car did not stop and it was too late for him to stop the train and avoid hitting the car. Besides, the Utah Department of Transportation was satisfied that the railroad crossing had met all the required safety standards; the court was thus satisfied that the state of the crossing was good and it could not be attributed to the accident. Even though the court concurred that the railroad crossing is hazardous, its simple existence was not in itself a breach of duty of care (a key element in establishing negligence).
John O. Hairstons died as a result of a collision on the South Fork River Bridge on 17 April 1978. Hairston negotiated the purchase of a 1978 Lincoln Continental automobile on Friday, 14 April 1978, at Haygood Lincoln Mercury, Inc. in Lowell, North Carolina. Apparently, as he waited, the service department employees at Haygoods replaced the standard wheels with turbine wheels from another automobile. After travelling for approximately 3.5 miles following conclusion of transaction at Haygood, the left rear wheel of the new Lincoln car came off. Thereafter, he was hit by a G.M.C truck operated by Robert Alexander and he died. Alexander Tank argued that Haygood’s negligence was the proximate cause of Hairston’s death.
The rule of law ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Business Law - brief case using FIRAC method. and more Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1595370-business-law-brief-case-using-firac-method-and-more
(Business Law - Brief Case Using FIRAC Method. And More Essay)
https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1595370-business-law-brief-case-using-firac-method-and-more.
“Business Law - Brief Case Using FIRAC Method. And More Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1595370-business-law-brief-case-using-firac-method-and-more.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Business Law - brief case using FIRAC method. and more

Business law : brief a case

...Case Brief: Kinney Shoe v. Polan 939 F.2d 209 (1991) Introduction: The importance of the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil was adequately illustrated in the case of Kinney Shoe v Polan. The doctrine refers to a remedy which permits going beyond the corporate veneer of the corporation and attaching liability to its members. Although courts are reluctant to award the corporate veil remedy it will do so in an appropriate case. For instance in Kinney Shoe v Polan, the appellate court felt that it was necessary to pierce the corporate veil in order to provide compensation for Kinney shoe. By piercing the corporate veil, the plaintiff did not bear the risks of dealing with a dummy corporation, and this is as it should... be. In such a...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Case Brief

...CASE BRIEF: BARBARA A. BOTIS v. E OF GARY A. KUDRICK FACTS: Plaintiff, Barbara A. Botis filed a complaint against the E of Gary A. Kudrick in attempt to receive palimony. Plaintiff argues that her and Kudrick were in a “marriage-type relationship” before his death, and, therefore, has rights to palimony in the form of his two residences and other compensation. Defendant denies that they were ever in such as relationship and motions to dismiss her complaint along with issuing counterclaims against the plaintiff. While the law recognizes the right to palimony for two unmarried individuals who separate, a recent amendment requires the palimony agreement in writing. While the plaintiff...
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study

Business Law Case Brief

...Business Law Case Brief Plaintiff and Defendant: The plaintiff is an investment firm called Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. The defendant is Karen Howsam who was an investment client of Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. The plaintiff Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc advised Karen to invest in four limited partnerships owned by him. Facts: In 1994, Karen closed all the four accounts and moved to other investment companies. Karen claimed that Dean Witter had been issuing false information regarding the performance of the investments. When still a customer to Dean Witter, Howsam and Dean Witter had entered into an agreement that stated that any dispute arising in there dealing would ill be resolved by arbitration. Karen Howsam had a right to choose... for...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Business Law - Contracts/consideration - UCC, FIRAC, & questions

...Business Law Table of Contents I. FIRAC 3 II. UCC 4 2.306 4 2.308 4 2.309 4 2.310 5 III. Answers to Questions 5 Question 5 Question 2 6 Question 3 6 Question 10 6 Works Cited 8 I. FIRAC In this case, the contention of the moving party in the motion for summary judgment, where the moving party is the casino, is that there was no such breach of contract, because no contract exists. This is implied in the reasoning and the arguments put forth by the judge, who denied that motion for summary judgment, and ruled in favor essentially of Ms. Gottlieb. This means that the court finds that there is cause for Ms. Gottlieb to press for a breach of contract...
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment

Business law - Contract problems, FIRAC case, and short summary

...Contract law- Contract problems, FIRAC case, and short summary This paper seeks to explore legal concepts in contract law. The paper will analyze case studies, summarize a case, and discuss concepts of parole evidence rule. Cunningham vs. Driscoll Facts Cunningham and Driscoll entered into a contract of sale of soybeans a total price of $ 22000. Cunningham proceeded to send a purchase confirmation to Driscoll but Driscoll did not respond. Two months later, Driscoll refused to honor the arrangement forcing Cunningham to make alternative purchases at higher prices. Cunningham has sued for breach of contract but Driscoll argues for summary judgment on ground that the contract did not satisfy statute of fraud. Issue The issue... , was entitled...
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment

Business law - short answer about contract, and FIRAC a case

...Business law Law defines a set of rules that regulate interaction between members of the society. It outlines rights and obligation of parties in relations. This paper seeks to explore cases under law of contract. Douglas vs. special products Facts Douglas entered into a contractual agreement with Page Wilson under ‘non-compete’ provisions. Acquisition of Page Wilson resulted to ownership by Special products. Special Products, after Douglas’ resignation, filed a suit against him for soliciting the organization’s clients but he argued that there was no ‘non-compete’ contract. Issue The issue to be determined is whether a ‘non-compete’ contract existed...
2 Pages(500 words)Assignment

Wk6 case brief con law

...Wk6 case brief con law Task: Wk6 case brief con law The fourth amendment has remained a of discussion in various criminal cases around United States. In a case of Kentucky v. King, 563 U.S (2011) interpretation of exigent circumstance brought controversy regarding the feasibility of evidence before the Supreme Court. On the court proceedings, key factor, which played significant roles, included warrantless search, exigency and fourth amendment. Facts Various facts prevail in the case of Kentucky v. King, 563 U.S (2011). First, the police acting while undercover in October 2005 discovered the presence of marijuana in an apartment complex. This was the police from Kentucky Lexington-Fayette Urban County. Upon arrival at the door... of...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Using Scientific Method

..., there are other ways carried out to make it arable, they include; digging and installation of wells and canal, and addition of tree for shading purposes. As the experiment progress, we will record differences when nitrogen fertilizers added to maize into two different soil samples.( Brady & Weil ) Hypothesis: Since arable soil has been cultivated for many years, i believe that maize do better in the non-arable soil.( Brady & Weil ) Methods: The experiment was called mineral nitrogen fertilizer. Various kilograms of nitrogen fertilizers per 100 acres used to get result, fertilizer statistics composed in an increase of 20kg at each acre. In addition to that, a nitrogen fertilizer per 100 acres was...
1 Pages(250 words)Research Paper

Case Brief, Tax Law

...Lecturer Case Brief James O. DRUKER and Joan S. Druker, Petitioners-Appellants-Cross-Appellees, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,Respondent-Appellee-Cross-Appellant. Nos. 108, 115 and 116 United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit Facts: James O. Druker and Joan S. Druker, as plaintiffs sue the Commissioner of Internal Revenue to contest the constitutionality of the marriage penalty. After failing to file the correct and legitimate returns in 1975 and 1976, this couple argues that income tax structure is unfair and violates the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection. In their opinion, this was discriminatory to the working married couples like them. IRC Section 1 provides a clear guideline for...
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study

Business Law / Brief of Case 3

...Brief of Case 3 Case: David G. Byker v. Thomas J. Mannes, 641 N.W.2d 210 (2002) Procedure: Plaintiff, David Byker filed suit for the recovery of money lost in a partnership with defendant. Defendant is Thomas Mannes. Defendant won trial in the Court of Appeals. Plaintiff appealed to the Supreme Court of Michigan. Facts: {David Byker} was an accountant for defendant until they ventured in real estate business together. They engaged in multiple enterprises, agreeing to share all profits, losses, and expenses. To facilitate limited partnership investment, they created separate entities becoming general partners/ shareholders. The parties pursued several enterprises, M &B...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Business Law - brief case using FIRAC method. and more for FREE!

Contact Us