Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Go to advanced search...

United States v. Martha Stewart - Case Study Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
The defendants in this case were Martha Stewart and Peter Bacanovic. They both faced indictment on criminal charges emanating from Martha Stewarts December 27, 2001, sale of 3,928 shares of stock in ImClone Systems (FindLaw, 2012). …
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.1% of users find it useful
United States v. Martha Stewart
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "United States v. Martha Stewart"

Download file to see previous pages Prior to and in course of the case proceedings, Martha Stewart was the chairperson of the board of directors and chief executive officer of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia. Peter Bacanovic on the other hand was licensed by NASD to sell securities as a securities broker with the title "Financial Advisor" at Merrill Lynch & Co, Inc. ImClone systems is a biotechnology company in the US whose then-chief executive officer, Samuel Waksal, was Stewart's friend and a client of Stewart's stockbroker, defendant Peter Bacanovic. Subject to the cases on December 25, 2001, ImClone and Martha Stewart learned of the food and drug administration rejection of ImClone application for approval of Erbitux and announced the rejection of the application on December 28, 2001 after ImClone Chairperson December 27, 2001, sale of 3,928 shares of stock (FindLaw, 2012). This move and announcement prompted the Securities and Exchange Commission and the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to start investigations into trading treads of ImClone especially the sale of the stock before the announcement of application rejection on Erbitux to the public. The investigations led to the indictment of Martha Stewart and Peter Bacanovic. ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“United States v. Martha Stewart Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(United States V. Martha Stewart Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
“United States V. Martha Stewart Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF United States v. Martha Stewart

Research paper

...and Regulations of the Securities Industry to make any use, or enter into any securities transactions while in possession of nonpublic information or to place an order on the basis of "nonpublic" information regarding pending orders in the marketplace” (Huberman and Associates, 2011). But what exactly constitutes material and nonpublic information is up for interpretation, and after United States v. O'Hagan, there is a requirement to prove “culpable intent” (Carr, 1999). The SEC offers a simple bright line: “Insider trading" is a term that most investors have heard and usually associate with illegal conduct. But the term actually includes both legal and illegal conduct. The legal version...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Martha Stewart Livivng Omnimedia (MSO)

...?This article focuses mainly at understanding the two main financial instruments which are bonds and derivatives. The company that is selected for the analysis of bonds and derivatives is HP, one of the giant in manufacturing computing units. The first section is based upon the bonds and then followed by derivatives. Bonds (Notes) The long-term debts of HP constitute broadly three different kinds on notes. These are: US Dollar Global Notes EDS Senior Notes Other Notes including capital lease Obligations In the following paragraphs, the sub-kinds of the above mentioned notes are discussed. 1) US Dollar Global Notes These notes are primarily issued by HP thrice in last decade including 2002 shelf registration, 2006 shelf...
6 Pages(1500 words)Term Paper

Martha Stewart Unethical Practices

.... Martha Stewart was imprisoned for her part in the ImClone Systems stock trading acts that were classified as UNETHICAL. Martha Stewart was the chief executive officer ImClone Systems. The United States Securities and Exchange Commission and the United States probe of trading. In addition, two officers and the founder of ImClone Systems, Samuel Waksal, were arrested for their part in the stock market scandal. The officers of the company sold their stocks in the market to avoid generating losses from selling their stocks AFTER the news will crop up that the company is losing money. Likewise, both Zvi...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

United States v. Wade

...was violated as the line up was done without any legal counsel present to advise the accused of his rights. The courts denied the motion, resulting in the conviction of Wade in the end (n.d., “United States v. Wade). This led the defense to file a motion before the Supreme Court in order to request that they resolve the issue of allowing courtroom identifications of an accused to be excluded from evidence since the events surrounding the identification process was done without the presence of counsel. The events before the trial at the post indictment line up was therefore illegally conducted and was violation of his client's Fifth Amendment Rights (n.d., “United...
4 Pages(1000 words)Case Study

United States v. Salerno

... until trial. The 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals found that pretrial detention based upon the possibility of future dangerousness to be unconstitutional and a deprivation of liberty. The government won during the appeal round at the U.S. Supreme Court (“United States v. Salerno”). The 8th Amendment of the United States Constitution, which is based upon the English Bill of Rights, prohibits the application of excessive bail or fines, including cruel and unusual punishments. The right of bail is part of the U.S. Supreme Court belief in a person's right to traditional freedom prior to conviction. This law prevents the law enforcers from unlawfully holding an accused in jail for an indefinite period of time. This is the law that is used... by the...
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study


...break of SEC came when Merrill Lynch was tipped off that someone in the company is liable of disclosing confidential information to outside brokers. The investigation was shifted to one of the directors of the company Levine who had already made a huge sum of money through insider trading of the shares of Merrill Lynch. The investigation further revealed the accomplice of Levine, Siegel and Milken who were also working on reputable and strategic places in the company. The scandal of Martha Stewart The famous and notorious case of Martha Stewart is not new when it comes to insider trading scandal in the United States....
15 Pages(3750 words)Term Paper

United States v. Lopez violence and crime, therefore the federal government has established Gun-Free School Zones Act in 1990. According to this Act, guns are prohibited “within a school, on school property, or within a set distance of school property” (Federal Law on Guns in Schools, 2012). United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 (1995) Background In March 1992, a Texan Alfonso Lopez Jr. who was only eighteen years of age was caught by school authorities when he was bearing a 38-cal. handgun within his school premises. His excuse was that the gun was given to him by a classmate and he was supposed to deliver it to someone else. However, he soon got entangled in the web of law. He lacked the funds to hire a...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Martha Stewart

...Martha Stewart Martha Stewart, America's best known Domestic Diva, was recently charged with securities fraud, convicted of obstruction of justiceand sentenced to Federal Prison. Stewart had earlier been forced to resign from her position on the board of directors of the New York Stock Exchange. She was the CEO of her own multi-million dollar empire who was now facing felony time at Alderson Federal Penitentiary for what amounted to pocket change for Ms. Stewart. How could things have gone so wrong for Martha Could her attorneys have done something to present a more strategic defense for her case in an effort to minimize...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

United States v. Angevine

...Running head: business United s v Angevine Barring (very unlikely) explicit assurances of privacy from the company, should an employee have any expectation of privacy while in the workplace? Ideally, companies provide technology and related infrastructure to help its employees deliver better performance and results. It is very rare that companies provide such facilities as complementary benefits to its employees. Complements from companies usually include other kinds of gift items, remuneration etc, and not IT-related equipment. Equipments such as computers, laptops, phones etc provided by the company accompany their usage regulations and are, thus, monitored for usage. All companies that provide such...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

United States v. Jones

...United s v. Jones In the fourth amendment of US constitution, unreasonable searches and seizures against an individual are prohibited and require the judicial sanction of warrants before searches, seizures are initiated, and there must be a probable cause to effect the same (Wetterer 24). Under the amendment, searches and seizure warrants are limited depending on the information made available to the court issuing the search and seizure warrants by an officer, who swears by the same (Wetterer 78). Aspects based on the fourth amendment forms the basis for the case between United States versus Jones. In the making of court decisions involving the fourth amendment of the...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Case Study on topic United States v. Martha Stewart for FREE!

Contact Us