Free

Love brief a case - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Legal History: The appellant appealed against his conviction and sentence in the Lake County Court of Common Pleas for engaging in corrupt activities, attempted murder and aggravated arson targeting public officers.
Facts: In April 2006, Jason Green, a friend of the appellant…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.6% of users find it useful
Love brief a case
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Love brief a case"

v. Sands Supreme Court of Ohio, 2008 Legal History: The appellant appealed against his conviction and sentence in the Lake County Court of Common Pleas for engaging in corrupt activities, attempted murder and aggravated arson targeting public officers.
Facts: In April 2006, Jason Green, a friend of the appellant reported to a police detective that the appellant and his girlfriend were planning to kill four public officers. On the facts, Green and the appellant had suffered several encounters with local police and the Mayor and were of the opinion that they were deliberately targeting and harassed by the police. The duo purchased recording equipment and recorded conversations with officials with a view to proving harassment and spoke of filing a law suit. It was the constant encounters with the authorities that ultimately gave way to a plan to kill certain officials. After Green informed the detective of his suspicions, he agreed to wear recording equipment in conversations with the appellant. Thereafter, Green turned over a recorded conversation he had with the appellant in which the plans were discussed. The threat was deemed serious and the FBI were brought in. Thereafter the appellant and his girlfriend were under surveillance. Identified victims were informed and some relocated out of fear. Subsequent conversations between Green and the appellant were recorded and the appellant and his girlfriend began purchasing equipment and making plans in furtherance of the plan. As the appellant and his girlfriend at a store purchasing the last of the equipment they were arrested. The appellant gave his consent to a search of his home and shop in which equipment for making a bomb was discovered. Other equipment was discovered at the appellant’s shop. Although the appellant’s Miranda rights were read to him, he waived the right to remain silent and offered various explanations for the equipment found in his possession.
Legal Issues: The appellant raised several issues on appeal. The evidential grounds related to a complaint that the was not enough evidence to convict him on the RICO charge. The appellant also argued that prior bad acts were improperly admitted into evidence and that allowing victim impact evidence deprived him of his right to a fair trial.
Holding: The conviction and sentencing were affirmed and the appeal denied.
Legal Reasoning: The Supreme Court of Ohio reasoned that victim impact evidence was properly admitted by the trial judge because it demonstrated the seriousness of the offences. The court also reasoned that the appellant’s claim of insufficient evidence on the RICO count was without merit because the argument rested on the fact that the appellant was only charged with having been involved in one conspiracy. The rule of law expressed in State v Schlee (Dec. 23, 1994) 11th Dist. No. 93, Ohio App is that the evidence for conspiracy, the prosecution only need present credible evidence in order to be sufficient for a conviction. Although the appellant was charged with one conspiracy it involved several offences. As to the admission of prior bad acts, the court reasoned that trial judges have wide discretion to admit prior bad acts and an appellate court will only intervene if there is evidence of an abuse of that discretion (State v Rootes (March 23, 2001) 11th Dist. No. 20000 p. 0003). Abuse of discretion is not substantiated by mere error in judgment or law. There must be arbitrary reasoning or unreasonable attitudes or conduct that is “unconscionable” (State v Sands, 2008).
People v Beavers
NY Appellate Division, 1987
Legal History: The defendant was convicted of manslaughter in the first degree for a shooting which occurred on December 21, 1983. He appealed against his conviction.
Facts: At his trial the defendant called two alibi witnesses. The first of the alibi witnesses was the defendant’s mother who testified at the time of the shooting the defendant was with her at her apartment. The second witness was a man who lived with the defendant’s mother and he essentially corroborated the mother’s testimony. A prosecution police witnesses contradicted the alibi evidence by testifying that he had telephoned the defendant’s mother after the shooting while investigating another matter and had asked her for the defendant. The mother replied that she had not seen the defendant since Thanksgiving and that he was living in Memphis with a woman.
Legal Issues: The issue on appeal was whether or not the trial judge erred in allowing the prosecution to impeach the defendant’s witnesses by offering rebuttal evidence of collateral issues.
Holding: The defendant’s conviction was affirmed and the appeal dismissed accordingly.
Legal Reasoning: The court reasoned that rebuttal evidence intended to impeach a witness is permissible in specific circumstance. Generally, a when cross-examining a witness, the examiner may not bring in collateral issues either by documentary evidence or by other witnesses, “for the purpose of impeaching that witness’ credibility” (People v Pavao 59 NY 2d 282, pp. 288-289). The purpose of the general rule is to ensure that the defendant is not taken by surprise and that the jury is not confused about the relevant issues (People v Schwartzman 24 NY 2d. 241, p. 245). However, evidence is not regarded as collateral when it is necessary for proving some fact that is not related to the credibility and is intended to disprove facts offered by a witness for rebutting evidence given in direct testimony (People v Wise 45 NY 2d 321). In fact, the trial judge instructed the jury that:
A rebuttal witness is [one] who is called in order to rebut testimony that has been introduced by the defense and for that purpose only (People v Beavers, 1987).
It was also reasoned that in People v Schwartzman the court ruled that the general rule is intended to avoid confusion but is not applicable when the evidence introduced is relevant for proving any fact “other than contradiction”. Moreover, it is entirely unreasonable to place obstacles to one party’s ability to bring out mistakes in testimony when that mistake is an important issue at trial. In any event, all parties should be fully prepared to rebut all material issues at a trial and to expect that the other side will inevitably rebut issues raised. The court went further to state that although it is difficult to distinguish between collateral issues and issues that are not collateral, it is certainly clear that bias, interest and hostility on the part of witnesses are not collateral issues and may be offered in evidence. In addition, evidence is not collateral when it is used to impeach the credibility of a witness in the context of the issues that jurors are required to sort out. More importantly, the prosecution was at liberty to offer evidence rebutting the defence. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Love brief a case Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 2”, n.d.)
Love brief a case Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 2. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1590205-love-brief-a-case
(Love Brief a Case Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words - 2)
Love Brief a Case Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words - 2. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1590205-love-brief-a-case.
“Love Brief a Case Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words - 2”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1590205-love-brief-a-case.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Love brief a case

How People Fall in Love

...apparel attraction. Study also reveals that if love is based on monitory aspects and sexual attraction, it might not last long. For love to be successful, people should get attracted to the most basic instincts and characteristics of individuals. The presence of praiseworthiness and attraction are integral to love relationship. According to another research done by Syracuse University, falling in love can take only one fifth of a second. It is a quick process in which a person feels a feeling of euphoria for a brief moment and his/her emotional mechanism is activated. This emotional arousal causes him to stabilise his emotions and when he reaches the...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Case Brief

...CASE BRIEF: BARBARA A. BOTIS v. E OF GARY A. KUDRICK FACTS: Plaintiff, Barbara A. Botis filed a complaint against the E of Gary A. Kudrick in attempt to receive palimony. Plaintiff argues that her and Kudrick were in a “marriage-type relationship” before his death, and, therefore, has rights to palimony in the form of his two residences and other compensation. Defendant denies that they were ever in such as relationship and motions to dismiss her complaint along with issuing counterclaims against the plaintiff. While the law recognizes the right to palimony for two unmarried individuals who separate, a recent amendment requires the palimony agreement in writing. While the plaintiff does not have her...
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study

Love Brief case state v stark

...Case brief: Stark v. Stark Facts: In the year 1988 it comes to Stark’s knowledge that he is HIV positive. After confirmation of the disease he receives proper counseling and training as far as safe sex and managing his HIV was concerned. Despite numerous warnings Stark disregards the doctor’s orders, which was when he is left with no choice but to implement a “cease and desist order” authorized by RCW 70.24.024(3)(b). Even then Stark’s failure to comply resulted in his doctor reporting his actions to the County prosecutor’s office where he was then charged with three accounts of assault in 2nd degree under RCW 9A.36.021(1)(e). Proceeding: The proceeding can be correctly categorized into multiple counts;...
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study

Case Brief

...CASE BRIEF CASE ALBION FRANCIS VS NORMAN Y. MINETA; Transport Security Administration. US. October 10, 2007 CASE NO.: 06-1293 U.S Court of appeal Opinion Albion francis, a former federal worker, chose to appeal to the district court’s decision to dismiss his case pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.p.12 (b) (1), in which he purports to have been discriminated in employment. Statement of facts. The district court established that the appellant had not consulted all the administrative avenues as required under Title VII and so found the dismissal was warranted. The appellant, however, was discontented with the court’s decision and sort, to appeal to the court of...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Case Brief

...Law Case Facts In the Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (195) case, the claimant sued respondent for treating the black American children unfairly. The black American children did not have an access to learning institutions set for the white children (Orlik, 2010). The law suit was against the District Board of Education which had established separate learning institutions for white and for black children in the district. The claimant presented to the district court in Kansas as a representative of the parents under the name of Brown who was one of the thirteen parents filling the case. Mr. Brown filed in 1951 in United Sates district court. The education board based their...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Case brief

...Continental Oil Company vs. Occupational safety and Health Review Case brief: The petitioner in this case is continental oil company while the respondent is the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission. The petitioner is seeking the United States of Appeals to revert an order issued by the respondent that it desecrated the general clause duty on Occupational safety and Health Act. The commission had ruled that the oil company failed to protect its employees from hazardous incidents, following an explosion that occurred in one of its premises that resulted to the death of three people. However the court of appeal senior judge, Phillips affirmed the decision held by the...
1 Pages(250 words)Case Study

BRIEF CASE

...Case Brief The Parties Teresa D. Oglesbee is the party appealing to the court of appeal. Teresa is also the plaintiff since she is the party offended. Pfeil Funeral Homes, Inc. is the appellee; Pfeil is also the defendant in the case, Teresa D. Oglesbee v. Pfeil Funeral Homes, Inc. William H. Smith, Jr. represents Teresa and Kurt R. Welterndorf is the representative for Pfeil Funeral Homes, Inc. in the Court of Appeal. Therefore, Teresa is the plaintiff/appellant and Pfeil is the defendant/appellee. Facts of the Case The case, Teresa D. Oglesbee v. Pfeil Funeral Homes, Inc. is a premises liability case. Teresa D. Oglesbee is the...
3 Pages(750 words)Coursework

Case brief

...Case brief Affiliation: The case is Mikell v. School Administrative Unit 33, case number 2008-737 which was decided in May 15, 2009, http://caselaw.findlaw.com/nh-supreme-court/1204844.html 2. FACTS Joshua Markiewicz was a seventh grader student who hanged himself. He had been having disciplinary troubles in school which the school counselor was aware of and had informed his mother about some of them. A statement however about him “wanting to blow his brains out” was however termed as not serious by the counselor to his mother and he was made to sign a contract of safety but the matter was never followed again. The mother was suing the school administration including the...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment

Case Brief

...Case Brief of Crane vs. Commissioner of Internal Affairs Affiliation A case brief of Crane v. Commissioner of internal revenue No. 68 Supreme Court of the United States 331 U.S. 1; 67 S. Ct. 1047; 91 L. Ed. 1301; 1947 U.S. LEXIS 3021; 47-1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P9217; 35 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 776; 1947-1 C.B. 97; 1947 P.H. P72, 004 Fact: After the death of her husband in January 1932, Mrs. Crane became the sole beneficiary of and the executrix of her husband’s will. The inheritance comprised of an apartment lot and building subject to a mortgage, which secured an interest in default of $ 7,042.50 and a primary debt of $ 255,000.00. Mrs. Crane, afterwards, got into a contract with...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Case

...Case Brief al affiliation CASE BRIEF Thelma Agnes Smith v. David Phillip Rilley Court of Appeal of Tennessee, Eastern Section at Knoxville, 2002. 2002 Tenn. App. LEXIS 65 Facts: Smith and Riley who had lived together for several years though out of wedlock. Together they opened a joint account where each one of them deposited money. After sometime, the two separated and the plaintiff Thelma, approached the court to enforce two written agreements that were about a sale and assignment of a property. Riley had entered into a lease agreement with Jerry Strickland and Wanda Strickland. The lessor was given the option to purchase by the agreement. After about four months...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Love brief a case for FREE!

Contact Us