Intervention Program on Childhood Obesity - Assignment Example

Running Head: CHILDHOOD OBESITY Childhood Obesity of Institute Author Note Intervention Program One of the intervention programs implemented in Cincinnati, located in Ohio, is the ‘Childhood Obesity Bill’. Ohio took an imperative step in the fight against childhood obesity when the state Senate approved its type of the Healthy Choices for Healthy Children rule. The bill, as planned, would necessitate schools to offer more nutritious food choices, to quantify students’ body-mass index, and to deliver 30 minutes of physical exertion each day. The version that was approved May 18 by the Senate comprises these elements, but permits schools fronting budget woes to apply for abdications. Child obesity rates in the U.S. have more than trebled in the previous 30 years, and one of every three kids is obese, counting the children in Ohio.  Obesity of such prevalent proportions can lead to innumerable negative implications on children’s health, and the health of the adults they develop into. Around one-third of Ohio children are obese or overweight, and that number has been growing over the years. Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Centre and the Ohio Children’s Hospital Association have powerfully reinforced this bill from thebeginning. According to the 2008 Ohio Family Health Survey, around 500,000 children between the age 10-17 (35.6%) are regarded as overweight or obese according to BMI-for-age values. Moreover, the National Survey of Children’s Health implies that 37.1% of children ages 10-17 in Kentucky are overweight or obese, positioning Kentucky as the 48th in the nation. These general statistics disguise the greater burden of obesity among low income as well as minority populations. It is a common fact that physically fit and active children actually do better educationally, and that large and overweight children are 30% more likely to repeat a grade and nearly 60% more probable to miss more than two weeks of school. It is indications like these that support policy makers comprehend why action is needed. 1. Objectives of the Program, the Details of Planning and Implementing it, and the Outcomes and Methods of Measuring/Evaluating the Program’s Success In Ohio, the Healthy Choices for Healthy Children Act addresses some of the serious action items required to make kids healthy: 1. Get kids more mobile and instruct them about the benefits of physical activity – the bill escalates physical activity as well as physical education requirements in the schools of Ohio. 2. Support them in making healthier eating selections – the bill progresses the nutritional alternatives available to children in the school situation. 3. Measure the progress – the legislation enlarges existing measurement options to collect BMI status of children at school entry in 3rd, 5th as well as 9th grades all across the state. The wide spread epidemic of obesity will require an intensive comeback on the part of families, communities, practitioners as well as policy makers at the local, state, and national points. Focus should linger on generating the evidence base to notify policy decisions, creating timely data available to support and assist in monitoring progress, serving practitioners in improving their ability to stop, recognize, and cope with children who face obesity, and associating with community organizations to improve synchronised, multi-sectorial responses. A specific importance in our work will be given to those excessively affected by childhood obesity, which include low-income, racial minorities as well as under-resourced groups, families, and kids. 2. Role of Community in the Intervention Program State government can and should take the responsibility to act as a leader in organizing the necessary groups and backing up policy changes to stop and reverse obesity tendencies. In acknowledgment of that role, on Sept. 19, 2008, Gov. Ted Strickland distributed an instruction to the Ohio Department of Health‘s Office of Healthy Ohio to cultivate a wide-ranging as well as multi-faceted obesity prevention plan for the State of Ohio by the date March 31, 2009. The directive states the plan should advance goals and endorsements to fund and improve specific actionable obesity deterrence procedures for the inhabitants of this State, with specific attention paid to children and adolescents. In accumulation to counting goals to guarantee that state agencies, boards as well as commissions are integrating obesity prevention approaches into their programs. The focus will remain on addressing specific parts including, but not partial to, creating school and employer policies to advance student and employee health by decreasing obesity, assisting communities that inspire more active lifestyles, reducing the availability and intake of healthy foods, snowballing physical activity levels of Ohioans, and finally associating with the medical community in the early diagnosis and avoidance of obesity. 3. Factors to Consider when Planning the Intervention Program Given the ubiquity of the obesity problem and the abundant possible tactics for interference, four predominant focus areas should be advanced to direct and chaperone the plan. The targets consist of: Focus on prevention: Indication of effective actions for reversing obesity in individuals for the long-term is inadequate, so efforts should be concentrated on inhibition of overweight and obesity. Focus on population-based, multi-faceted approaches: These strategies are most likely to lead to prosperous results. While individual conduct change is essential, those modifications can and should be maintained, fortified and empowered through state as well as community approaches and strategies. Focus on most at-risk populations: In the Ohio Obesity Prevention Plan, specific attention should be focused on groups most at risk for increasing obesity and associated chronic diseases. Focus on evaluation of efforts: Due to the complexities of obesity, it is improbable that major drops in obesity rates will be attainable in the short term. Momentary evaluation approaches are critical to size progress toward behaviour, policy in addition to environmental changes that sustain the hindrance of obesity and ultimate lessening of obesity rates. 4. Comparison with other Intervention Programs The New Mexico’s Diabetes Prevention & Control Program is targeted to the population at risk for diabetes and delivers resources as well as information to the public as well as health care providers. This aims to decrease the number of people suffering from Diabetes each year by increasing awareness. Similarly, Breast & Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program is targeted at the females at risk for cancer for the early prevention as well as treatment. It is devoted to increasing access to high-quality breast and cervical cancer screening as well diagnostic services for women who are under assisted, and to snowballing public awareness through education about inhibition, disease processes and the rank of regular screening exams for fast detection of cancer. Another popular intervention program is the HIV Prevention Program which aims to diminish HIV transfer by forecasting, backing, organizing and evaluating evidence-based HIV prevention interventions for at-risk inhabitants across New Mexico. Moreover, another prevention program by the name of Tobacco Use Prevention and Control Program (TUPAC) is aimed at the youth. TUPAC recognizes the target audience of this campaign as the middle school and high school students who are worried with moving up the social ladder and will do whatever it takes, counting smoking, to be acknowledged by a certain group of peers. The dominant message of the campaign focuses on the fact that social dismissal, not approval, is an immediate consequence of the choice to smoke (NM Prevention, 2011). 5. Best Practices for Planning, Managing and Evaluating an Intervention Program for this Health Problem Measurement and evaluation are important modules to determining progress toward specified goals. The development of the Ohio Obesity Prevention Plan has combined commencement plans for the investigation and/or assessment of each objective. Management of plan assessment will be the responsibility of the Ohio Community Wellness Alliance. Additional development of resources and knowledge will be recognized by the Alliance, along with a plan for recording progress, classifying best practices and endorsing revisions to the plan. The authorities should also regulate, support and perform an active transport infrastructure. The exercise of combining schools (several grades on a single campus) and trends concerning school acreage necessities have caused aneed for bigger areas of land, seldom available in more densely populated communities, effectually forcing schools to construct in less populated areas. The outcome is a community that is fitting for cars but not for students to walk to school. The occurrence of United States children who walk or bike to school has reduced dramatically over the last generation. Increasing the sum of students who can and do utilize active transportation to school is an imperative step in cultivating children‘s daily physical movement. 6. Etiology of the Problem It is problematic to correlate nutritional choices and childhood obesity by observational research. However, trend data recommend some changes in eating patterns and consumption that may be connected with increases in obesity. In general, children and adolescents are consuming more food away from home, drinking more sugar-sweetened drinks, and snacking more regularly. Convenience has become one of the main measures for American’s food choices today, encouraging more and more people to consume ‘away-from-home’ quick service as well as restaurant meals in addition to buy ready-to-eat meals to cook at home. The nutritional configuration of children’s diets as well as the amount of calories consumed is of concern to regulate the effect of food consumption on childhood obesity. References NM Prevention. (2011). New Mexico Prevention. In New Mexico Prevention. Retrieved September 22, 2011, from http://www.nmprevention.org/. Read More