Research review - Book Report/Review Example

Clearing the controversy would be deemed necessary by educationists who dedicate their attention to students with special needs, assisting them to formulate the appropriate procedures favouring the special needs thereon. Researchers such as William E. Heward have devoted a significant contribution of their academic research to the question of the effectiveness of the teaching and learning experience in the classroom. In one of such papers that the researcher has delivered (Heward, 2003), the author identifies ten specific notions that he labels faulty in as far as the classroom experiences of the teacher and the student are concerned1.

In the paper, a deliberate attempt to unravel the causes of compromised effectiveness education experience is manifested, which strikes an important interest for the following discourse. This discourse critically enumerates the credibility of the author’s position, by analysing three of the identified ten points. Thesis statement: the effectiveness of special education experience can be defined by analysing the weight of three of Heward’s notions namely; impact of curricula, measuring student performance and impact of internal motivation to learning outcomes.

Firstly, Heward (2003) holds the position that there is a faulty notion among scholars as well as education stakeholders that structured curricula impedes the appropriate learning experience. The author reckons that it is wrong for education theorists and stakeholders to imagine that the standardisation of the curriculum acts as a barrier to explorative learning. In the notion, students and the teachers are confined within the limited predetermined scope, which negatively impacts on the student’s learning experience.

According to the author, several points of reference have been made by school system reform campaigners who identify this as a dangerous restriction which turns out to be boring to