Two-thirds of Head office expenses represent an apportionment of other head office expenses which are not relevant to the project and are classified as sunk costs. We will add back an amount (2/3 of £0.66) equal to £0.44 to estimate the true cash flows relevant to the…
Download file to see previous pages...
However, I will prefer net present value method since it takes into account the cash flows, cost of capital, economic life and the value (wealth) that will be added to the shareholder’s equity. The other methods simply give you a holistic view of the scenario while NPV method is much precise and has fewer shortcomings.
First of all, it is necessary for investment appraisal also to take in account the after-tax cash inflows and any opportunity cost which is forgone during the life of the project. In the above appraisal we ignored the cost of taxes which is an issue of practical concern. In addition to that, it is imperative to take incremental cost or benefits that will arise from the project when evaluating two projects.
Discounted cash flow methods have been given considerable attention in the contemporary world; especially the NPV and IRR method have been extensively used by corporations to evaluate their capital projects. These methods are more time consuming and costly that the other principle techniques such as payback period and accounting rate of return. In United Kingdom, Payback method has been the preferred method for evaluating projects rather than the DCF methods because of its ease of use; a finding which is consistent with the “costly truth” hypothesis (Sangster, 1993).
There are several issues of concern in investment appraisal and each of the appraisal method has its own pitfalls. Net Present Value is often criticized for using an inappropriate discount rate to discount the cash flows which often leads to faulty conclusions. Furthermore, an implicit assumption about NPV method is that cash flows are reinvested at the discount rate which is not a valid assumption. In other words, it implies that the management is assuming that for the economic life of the project, the cash flows can be invested at a rate of return equal to the discount rate. Because in the practical
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Capital Budgeting and Investment Appraisal: The Alpha plc. Case Coursework”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1572088-capital-budgeting-and-investment-appraisal-the-alpha-plc-case
(Capital Budgeting and Investment Appraisal: The Alpha Plc. Case Coursework)
“Capital Budgeting and Investment Appraisal: The Alpha Plc. Case Coursework”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1572088-capital-budgeting-and-investment-appraisal-the-alpha-plc-case.
The cash receipts are sufficient to meet cash payments as soon as the taxi hire rates are raised to $30 per hour from fourth month. The maximum shortfall is in the month of May and that is by $776. Accordingly arrangement of overdraft for around $800 in April for a period of four months will serve the cash requirements of Nod.
The author states that the capital budgeting is vital in developing evidence-based criteria for investment decisions. The analysis incorporates the aspect of IRR, NPV profile, MIRR, incremental cash flow as well as the impact of investment tax credit. The paper concludes with a classical decision making rationale inherent in the proposed sale projection.
This is, till now, considered to be the roadmap for the future development of a business. It clearly states about business’s objectives, business finances and its forecasts, and business’s share in the market (Wildavsky, 1996). Budgeting is a tool which can measure the success of the business, its rate of growth and possibilities of further future development.
The paper will discuss the issues in investment appraisal, cost of capital, and risk in relation to investment appraisal. The concepts of cash flows and discounting are very much related to the concept of time value of money, which assumes that a £100 today has more value or is preferable than £100 in the future.
In order to get the MIRR for project B, let us assume the same rate of reinvestment as above (10%). Using the same formula, the future value of the positive cash flow = 700,000 (1.1) ^5 + 250,000(1.1)^4 + 1,350,000(1.1)^3 + 1,650,000(1.1)^2 +
The Discounting Cash Flow Model is not reliable as a perfect tool for valuation because it is practically not able to predict the growth rate of the company’s cash flows. However, it can give an estimate of the value of the company in combination with other
Furthermore, the paper shall critically analyze its cash flow statement to determine the pertaining trend of the organization and provides suggestion to sustain profitability of the company.
Analyzing the video it can be observed that the Geroge’s business is
However, for the bond holders they are not to expect anything since the case does not include them in valuation gain of the company.
From the above calculation, one can also deduce what will happen if the company
Business capital budgeting decisions should be taken with a lot of precaution because they influence the long-term growth of the organization, affect overall risk of the business, involve commitment of enormous amount of funds and the projects are mostly irreversible or
1 Pages(250 words)Coursework
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Coursework on topic Capital Budgeting and Investment Appraisal: The Alpha plc. Case for FREE!