Morality of actions is one of the important aspects of moral philosophy dealing with the way we perceive morality of the actions and their consequences. There are different approaches, which deal with how we may negotiate with different actions and their morality. However,…
Download file to see previous pages...
Morality of actions define whether an action is considered as morally correct or not therefore it is important that some practical examples of actions which can be considered as good or not are presented. In this section, I will enumerate three examples each of actions which can be considered as morally right or wrong.
Above examples indicate that the morality of each of the actions described above are based on their relative connection with the individual perception of good and bad. Individuals may perceive and internalize the truth according to their own mental perception of how they view and process the facts from moral perspectives.
The underlying moral principle which I believe can succinctly define above actions is the relativistism of these actions with good or bad. Actions can be considered as good or bad based on the way they are related with acceptable ways of doing things. I, therefore, believe that my underlying moral principle based on the above actions is related with relativistim of actions with acceptable norms and values. For example, war in its strictest sense may be morally wrong, however, considering the circumstances around 9/11 event and loss of innocent lives, it may be a morally justified war because it is based on a contextual point of reference. The moral principle described above therefore is a direct derivative of the examples mentioned above.
The basic underlying principles of Utilitarianism advocate on the utility of the actions regardless of their consequences, therefore, any action under utilitarianism is considered as morally right, which can create greatest good for the greatest number of people. This is regardless of the fact the consequences of the action may not be entirely favorable or good, and it was because of this reason that utilitarianism endorses actions, which have significantly different consequences for minority.
My principle is similar to the utilitarianism in the sense that both
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Moral Principle Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1568845-moral-principle
(Moral Principle Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
“Moral Principle Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1568845-moral-principle.
The profit maximization is equivalent to maximization of the social welfare (Schmalensee, Armstrong & Porter 2007). This is because all gains from trade, i.e. social welfare, are absorbed by the producer, with the consumer getting no share of it. Social welfare is converted into profits for the producer.
.............................................10 References……………………………..11 Introduction What is right and wrong has been with humanity from time immemorial. In every society, there has always been a definition of what is acceptable and what is not: what is appropriate and what is inappropriate.
In the case of food taste, people tend to possess varied opinions concerning their favorite flavors and tastes. A specific example of food taste concerns the different ice cream flavors available in the market. These flavors were developed due to varying preferences among the society’s members.
In this article he has emphasized on two issues. One issue is an analogy provided by him. In this analogy he mentions that if a child is drowning in a pond then we should save him if there is no fear of risking our lives in that act. If we really face such a situation then it would without doubt be a moral obligation to save the child.
Moral diversity can be interpreted in different ways through a non-objectivist point of view. Non-objectivism is divided into three basic types: moral subjectivism, cultural relativism and moral nihilism. Moral subjectivism explains that morality is relative to the individual’s beliefs and values.
The difference between Kant’s moral philosophy and the empirical moral philosophy is that the later is biased towards the posterior principles or those that are garnered through the observations and experiences of human beings. Kant, using this distinction, referred to the empirical moral philosophy as moral anthropology.
Moreover, it argues that the advertisements of this company have been playing a major role in causing obesity among children between the age of 2 years and 11 years. However, the case study accepts that Kraft Foods Company has tried to minimize its television,