Freedom refers, in general terms, to independence. Freedom of speech, hence, is the independence of people to say and express what they feel about certain thing, matter or person. This freedom is the right…
Download file to see previous pages...
The paper aims to refute all arguments against freedom of speech and provides arguments against any restrictions on freedom of speech in certain countries like Canada.
Freedom of speech provides people with different views about life, political condition, people, education, society and the whole world. This freedom is not aimed to defame anyone or anything but people provide their deepest thoughts and perceptions about different issues. These varying ideas and opinions provide the uninformed with a wide range of possibilities and sufficient grounds to make their own judgement. Hence freedom of speech, in this context, must remain untied with restrictions and laws. The criticism against freedom of speech is the fact that people may use this right in order to defame other people, develop controversies and negatively change people’s arguments. The criticisers believe that restrictions must be imposed in order to protect people’s privacy and reputation from the abusers of this freedom. The justification to their criticism is the increasing debates over political, social and religious issues. The increasing conflicts and worsening law and order situation provide them with the chance to stand against such freedom.
In my opinion, all these arguments are, to a great extent, baseless. Milton describes in Areopagitica two kinds of people: the prudent ones and others who are imprudent. Prudent class of people are able to distinguish between good and bad, reasonable and unreasonable; imprudent, on the other hand, are unaffected by any judgements. In other words, we may say that prudent class has the power to analyze, asses and judge every event, claim or argument; whereas, imprudent do not have their own opinion and they lack the power of expressing and judging. Hence, imprudent remain unaffected by the opinions and expressions of others and prudent accept the claims only if they have any instance of truth in them. Moreover, it is
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
In the case of Vicenty v. Bloomberg (Find Law n.d.), the court should grant the plaintiff their request because they have never been found to be involved in any acts of vandalism relating to the painting of graffiti. They want to use the banned items to carry on their painting whether for enjoyment, for school or as a means of earning an income.
This also applies to artists who wish to legally express their ideas through their God-given talent. Art, of which graffiti is a part of, has for a long time been one of the ways through which people feel free to express themselves. In New York, it is illegal for anyone under the age of 21 to possess spray paint cans and broad tipped indelible markers, which are important tools for graffiti art.
In the US, the First Amendment is a very popular right, employed by every kind of individual. Disappointingly, it is often obviously utilized as a means to justify a wrongdoing such as in Skywalker vs. Navarro and Luke Records vs. Navarro. This writer does not agree with the reversal by the circuit court because it is the writer’s opinion that As Nasty As They Wanna Be does meet the third part of the Miller Test.
As with all things positive, there are negatives. Speech is no exception. For every person who uses their freedom to protect others, to protest injustices, to stop violence, another uses it to hurt others, and to push the boundaries beyond what seems reasonable.
The essay "Freedom of Speech" states that one of the areas that free speech is universally held as sacred is the freedom of religion or even the freedom from religion. Without knowing how our free government came about, it is impossible to understand the meaning of the term, free government.
In this regard, magazines such as Hustler emphasize that men have the right to exercise their brutal sexuality because it suits their nature. Pornography is viewed as something that reflects the true nature of men and therefore the
According to Boss (2009), fighting words are words whose utterance has the effect of either inciting the immediate breach of peace or the infliction of injury. Fighting words are usually employed in the conveyance of visceral and direct contempt or
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Freedom of Speech for FREE!