Download file to see previous pages...
en by Catherine Porter and titled as “Lessons of the Montreal Massacre: Why women must fight to be what they want” for bias and the level of bias presented in her publication.
The title is the first element of an article that attracts the reader and motivates him to read or believe that which way the article is inclined towards. The title of this article clearly indicates that it is in favor of women who are biased or facing difficulties in being what they want. However, the article title leaves the reader thinking about the main theme and hence promotes the reading process. Porter uses words which show her own involvement in the issue. She uses the words like ‘we’ and ‘us’ to convey the message of togetherness and mutuality of opinions. Porter uses certain words which clearly state her biased views and even expose her targeted audience through this article. For instance she writes “If you are one of those young women…” which clearly indicate that this article is written with a perspective to persuade women readers on her perspective.
She uses a persuasive tone to attract the readers and accept her claims. She states “If you are one of those young women who says you arent a feminist, you havent heard this story.” This claim, on one hand, challenges the thoughts of women who say they are not feminist and emphasizes on the importance of her stated story on the other. The facts exposed in this article are of course of immense importance. Like the reference to particular incidents and facts help in developing her claim. For instance the reference to the incident which she adds in her article as “In 20 minutes, he shot or stabbed 27 people, mostly women, before shooting himself. Fourteen of his victims died.” This claim does not only put the women at a disadvantageous position because of discrimination or bias from the opposite gender but also explains the level of discrimination and bias by stating that “All of them were women”. Her
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Answers 1) The article published in The Washington Times evinces a conservative bias in the sense that it adheres to the traditional conservative stand of correlating the right to possess arms with the right to self defense and a lower crime rate. This article also affiliates to the conservative organizations like The National Rifle Association.
To date, there are several means of detecting explosives materials in airports ranging from small to big quantities. Security checks are done on airline passengers, checked luggage, hand-carried baggage, and cargo containers, and the methods are mainly based on 3 principles: 1) Reasonable efforts must be exhausted to prevent terrorist access to airports; 2) Terrorists who are able to penetrate the initial security screening will still go through weapons detection procedures and explosives detection system, and; 3) Aircraft systems and structure should be built in a way that minimizes any damage that could result from blasts and raises the chances of passenger survival (Marshall & Oxley 2009,
24). Unfortunately though, it has not been always that forecasts have been inconsistencies between actual outcomes and overall results. When such consistent differences occur, we say there has been forecast bias (Dechow, Kothari and Watts 1998, p. 53). Indeed, studies on forecast bias have been so interesting that researchers are constantly trying to come to terms with what may be the reason why such biases take place and the factors influencing their occurrences.
With regards to the writer, it is important to note that David Charter became a European correspondent of The Times in September 2006 after four years as a chief political correspondent. It is also reasonable that the writer has vested interests in the trial, especially taking into consideration.
According to many experienced researchers and experts, self discovery is one of one of the most essential ways of overcoming the research biases, blind spots as well as the cognitive limitations of the researchers. The result of my observation of the photograph has taught me that it is critically important for researchers to openly engage in honest discussions regarding research subjectivity and bias.
He prepared an essay which opened up the grounds for research on how bias contributes to poor decision making. The essay is a clear indication of the numerous errors that people make due to biases. It is the
ocess at any stage ranging from the collection of data, the sampling of the aspects, testing a given set of data just like encouraging a given outcome in a research all reflect bias and could affect the results. A deep understanding of it helps researchers keep an open mind and