Download file to see previous pages...
It was established in the eighties. Born in a poor family, Escobar got involved in drug business. By the time he was 22, he had become a millionaire. In 1989, he was the seventh richest person in the world. He became so influential that he could offer bounties for killing of an ambassador of the United States. He was one of the big three of the Medellin Cartel. His death was a significant step on the way of the United State’s efforts war on drugs.
This essay will examine the rise and fall of Columbian Drug King Pin Pablo Escobar. The United States had to combat the growing threats of violence, corruption and murder used by the Medellin drug cartel to traffic cocaine into United State’s borders, and it declared an all out war on terror.
The massive import of cocaine, subsequent effect on the price of cocaine leading to increasing cases of drug abuse necessitated the United States to act directly and take part in the efforts of the Colombian Police’s hunt for Escobar. Ultimately the United States were instrumental in imparting enough skills and training to the Colombian police to track down and bring down Escobar, the ruthless drug lord and murderer who had practically ruled Colombo for larger part of almost a decade. The experience of dealing with the Medellin cartel and the method used to hunt down Escobar also helped the United States to establish a system to deal with foreign drug cartels. It is thus important to study the way that the United States dealt with the menace of the Medellin drug cartel.
The Medellin cartel was established in the early eighties by the drug lord, former car thief Carlos Lehder. Because of its geographical location favorable both for import of raw material from Peru and Bolivia and export by smuggling in to the United States, Colombia was a major country where cocaine was produced. Earliest references to the Medellin drug cartel date back to 1977, when the expression was first used in
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Criminal profiling can be defined as an approach in which, an expert takes the minute details of a crime and narrows down the suspect or group of suspects, hailing from a certain segment of society who may have used specific modalities.
The act of over criminalization imposes a problem in being in conformity with the law even in the circumstances that they want to do it in good faith. The problem of enacting a plethora of new criminal law is making the lives of the public difficult. It is time a substantial proportion of the repeal newly enacted criminal laws in order to sanitize the already overcrowded field with criminal law.
The prick of conscience in Cain was greater and the confrontation of God mentioned in the Bible may be an extension of his own wounded self. It is often fascinating to know the mind of a criminal. What makes a criminal is still an enigma to the human psychologists.
In order to achieve this, laws were made and enforced so that societies can function in an efficient manner. Social order, and its enforcement, is important for the survival of any society because this is the only way through which collective interest of the society can be preserved.
According to Bergman P., Berman S. (2009) “The insanity defense is based on the principle that punishment for serious crime is justified only if defendants were capable of controlling their moral behavior and could appreciate the wrongfulness of their behavior
officers carried out their search on the motel room the petitioner occupied while failing to abide with the requirement of the warrant that demands knocking and announcing before making the forcible entry to a premise. The issue on the mentioned case revolves around whether a
As the report stresses the Criminal Investigation Department provides organizations and government departments with security clearance for their potential and existing employees. This clearance involves a background check on individuals to establish if the person has a crime record, both within the UAE or anywhere in the world.
The author states that in the best interest of justice and natural fairness, it would be wrong to convict a person based on confessions which are not true. So he explores ways and means through which we could prevent the happenings of false confessions due to coercion or the urge by the party which has not conducted proper investigation.
7 Pages(1750 words)Research Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Criminal Justic for FREE!