Download file to see previous pages...
’s life story is important in knowing to its full extent the story of how the illness started and how the social and psychological domains affect the patient. It integrates the social interactions of individuals mentally, physically and emotionally in conceptualizing decease and illness. It has also been presented that the infliction and gravity of pain depends on sub-aspects such as gender, race, ethnic origin and tradition (Frankel et.al., 2003).
The biopsychosocial aspects are the factors which shape an individual, it provides an individual experience and knowledge. Because of this, an individual who was born and lived during the 1950’s will have different characteristics if that individual was born and lived during the 1970’s. This is because that individual would have a different environment due to change and development, and most experiences will be different from one point or the other. These are the reasons why in a biopsychosocial point of view, parents and nor child will not prosper (Levine, 2009).
The issue of cloning is closely connected to the debate of nature versus nurture in terms of how the cloned organism lives. Scientists speculate that cloned organisms will have more or less the same characteristics as its parents (Levine, 2009). This is because the genes and DNA structure of the cloned individual have the same structure as the parent of the clone. This is the nature aspect of the issue. On the other hand, it is also important to look into the nurture aspect which defines the environmental and social influences that impacts the life of the cloned individual. Yes, the cloned individual may have the same physical and biological attributes as the parent clone, but it may not have the same reaction to the present conditions wherein it will live because of the learning experience it will encounter. Although it has the same physical attributes as the parent clone, it may react differently to the situations around it because of the how it will
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Every human being has some inborn or hereditary qualities that are passed over to him through genes; but, there are a lot of other qualities that he learns over time through knowledge and experience. Whether humans are a result of hereditary information or they are modified by their environment in which they live, is the essence of the nature versus nurture theory (Shaffer, 2009, p.11).
Many scholars from different fields like sociology, psychology, biology and philosophy proposed different answers to our questions. Consequently, major findings about this event introduce clashing ideologies that fundamentally categorizes areas of knowledge.
Most experts say that both nature and nurture impact a child’s cognitive abilities as well as social and physical development but to what extent and exactly how much each contributes remains uncertain.
Nature is regarded as something natural and is referred to as genetically in the nature versus nurture debate and nurture is regarded as the affect of environment of an individual since the day he/she was born. Body Researchers state that the physical state of an individual is obtained through inheritance; this means that genetics play a major role in the physical formation of an individual (Powell, 2009, p.5).
What make us who we are how far are human behaviours, ideas, and feelings, innate, and how far are they all learned These issues are at the focal point of that continuing debate that is often known as the nature versus nurture debate or controversy (Nature nurture vs., n.d.).
Now each of us are also born with a set of shortcomings in our development that we must work towards overcoming in order to become successful in life. That is the simplest description that can be used to describe how
es with the difference and notwithstanding the fact that in all such differences an essential harmony runs through and in this Creation and everything is mutually connected. Gene versus environmental studies is the subject which is more of understanding than of analysis. As such
Nature Over Nurture: Temperament, Personality, and Life Span Development introduce the five-factor theory (FFT). FFT asserts that personality traits are endogenous dispositions and are not dictated by the environment (McCrae et al., 2000). I do not agree that personality traits and human behaviors are predominantly determined by biological factors.
According to the report Darwinism completely shifted the view of human behaviour. This paper will explore the core of the nature versus nurture debate and the manner in which psychologists have attempted to resolve this issue over the years, through a number of experiments and scientific investigations.
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Nature vs. nurture debate within the context of the biopsychosocial approach using a pretend cloning scenario for FREE!