Sharmas child, Pritam, purchased a toy from Toys4U. This was a toy missile, and Pritam received it on his 10th birthday. Mrs. Sharma apparently did not inspect the toy before giving it to Pritam, and Pritam launched the toy in the house. The…
Download file to see previous pages...
We also have Megastores in Cornwall, who supplied the toy to the retailer. And we have the Chen Organisation in China, who manufactured the toy. Also, it must be noted that Mrs. Sharma has two different causes of action, one based upon contract and one based upon torts.
The tort cause of action is based upon product liability. The rule regarding product liability can be found in Donoghue v. Stevenson, a famous 1932 case that stated that was the first case to establish that a manufacturer of goods and services owes a duty of care to all consumers of the product. It is special to note that there is no need for privity, in other words, the duty of care is not just owed to the person to whom the the manufacturer has a contractual obligation. Such as in the case of Donaghue, the basic facts are that a patron of a soda shop drank a ginger beer that had the remains of a snail in the beer. She sued, and, even though she did not purchase the drink, she won. She did not have a special contractual relationship, but this was not dispositive in this case.1
While Donaghue grounded product liability actions in negligence theory, this is no longer the case. The rule regarding product liability is one of strict liability now. This rule began in 1936 with the case of Grant v. Australian Knitting Mills2, in which the defendant was held liable to the plaintiff for underwear that had too much sulphite, but Commission directives from the Pearson Commission was not enacted.3 These cases and directives led to the Consumer Protection Act 1987, which governs product liability now. This was promulgated to enact the European Community Directive on Liability for Defective Products 1985.4 The Consumer Protection Act 1987 (hereinafter “CPA”) states that “where any damage is caused wholly or partly by a defect in the product, every person to whom subsection (2) below applies shall be liable for the damage.”5 The act goes
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Law fo business (Individual) Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1563935-law-fo-business-individual
(Law Fo Business (Individual) Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words)
“Law Fo Business (Individual) Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1563935-law-fo-business-individual.
However, it has become a daily routine for big corporations to enter new and prospective nations offering opportunities to grow and sustain the business proposition (Johnson & Turner 2010). BlueScope Steel- the Australian Steel manufacturer is all set to foray into Brazil to establish its business.
Bribery is a form of corruption which is illegal in law and falls beyond the boundaries of ethical code of conduct. In this case, accepting and receiving valuable gifts or anything that has value for the recipient is not allowed in the “employee code of conduct” of police department.
As such, only employees can be made redundant, avert statutory redundancy payments or bring claim for unjust dismissal. In this context, employers under the usual law principle of vivid liability may be liable for the convoluted actions of their employees; however, it is not a must that they be accountable for the actions of contractors employed independently.
Within the court system of the United States, admissibility of evidence has always proven to be one of the adversities in the legal framework. In this case, identifying the subject is the main issue and the case shows that the victim has identified the offender correctly every single time she was asked to do so.
this position is the fact that in a case that involves an appeal against any decision taken by a federal administrative agency, the litigant company can file a petition for review of the decision made by the administrative agency.(www.uscourts.gov).
A trial Court may not have
effective on January 15, 2007 and shall remain in effect until April 30, 2007 or until all obligations set forth in the Agreement have been satisfactorily fulfilled, or the agreement has been terminated, whichever occurs first. Contractor shall have a continuing obligation after
Breach of contract discharges the contract and the other party does not need to perform its part of the promise. The party that breaches the contract is called the aggressive party and the other party is called the aggrieved party. Normally, damages
A better number of such culprits target the IP address of the database and from there on they can retrieve any information in storage. Therefore, when a company is on dire need to translate its operations to using electronic
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Law fo business (Individual) for FREE!