Download file to see previous pages...
It is not morally and politically correct for people to act as Gods and decide the fate of another person even when we are in the face of intense pressure. In our case, the fact that the four men were stranded in the middle of nowhere and were in danger of starving to death does not give them the right to vote as who should live and who should die. The fact that Peter, Greg and John connived to give Paul the shortest straw can be considered as an act of discrimination. You see, these three men knew the present circumstances of Paul and apparently, the three of them decided that Paul is the person who is least likely to be missed by his family and his community. The discriminatory treatment against Paul is not only unfair, it is also immoral. Note also that the relationship of the four friends is based on mutual trust and confidence and the act of the three other men of conniving against Paul constitute an act of betrayal. Even if Paul was unemployed and he has not achieved much in life that does not mean that he is expendable. We have to understand that every human being should be treated equally regardless of his or her background.
On the other hand, based on the facts of our case, Paul did not want to take part in the scheme that Peter, Greg and John hatched is evident. He expressly told his friends that he did not want to take part in the plan of “sacrificing” someone so that the others could live. Since Paul did not give his express consent to his friends that they could eat him, his friends should never have forced him to sacrifice himself. On the other hand, even if Paul agreed to the plan of Peter, Greg and John, that does not make the plan to kill someone moral or legal. Taking another person’s life constitutes manslaughter or homicide at the very least and such act is punishable under the law.
With regards to the reaction of the public, outraged
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
White considerable embarrassment, especially if the marketing advertising had continued on this theme over an extended period of time.
Further, the exploitation clearly captures the plaintiff in its content (Shahid, 1). A similar
rent that the only goal that Ken Hoffman provided to Ruth Cummings when she was promoted as branch manager for the Saks Fifth Avenue store was that he was putting her in charge of the store and that “your job would be to run it so that it becomes one of the best stores in the
3. The management of the electrical company has ensured that they motivate their employees by looking at their behaviors and learning the best the best ways that they work. This ensures that they perform better in their different areas
1. Offering to the homeless an opportunity to the university does not for example inflict harm on any person and is therefore ethical. While some opinions may criticize the move by for profit universities to target homeless people for registration, a more critical
The bills of medicines and test summary are sent to insurance company. In this case due to unavailability of physician, professor himself went to healthcare clinic, which is substitute of Dr. Martin.
There are two groups that
This essay highlights two companies and the operations forecast software tools used.
The Delphi is an automotive production company that manufactures and supplies automotive products to various markets. As a result, it
This was the standard business procedure which was maintained between Moore Tires and Morecedes Tire. For a long time, the two businesses operated independently maintaining business relationships with all transactions getting settled between
Also, she outlines the frustrations of the majority of the graduating students, as one of the speakers during the graduation indicated. The speech, according to the author, which was from one of the outstanding female students during that
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic The Case of the Spelunkers for FREE!