Download file to see previous pages...
While to some this position on face value may seem to have credibility, a careful analysis of the theories from a Christian perspective shows his arguments lacking.
The first thing that strikes is McCloskey’s choice of beginning his discourse with a usual and chronically pleading argument that would appear to make sense and put the entire onus of “believing” or of “faith” on a human need to want to believe, rather than a spiritual analysis of why we do. McCloskey puts forth that many theists take the position that “atheism is a cold, comfortless position,”1, and quotes one Christian as saying, “It’s harder if you don’t believe in God.” 2 McCloskey’s argument, which he extracts totally from this position, is a tired one at best, tied to a humanistic era [the 1960s] that overly promoted, at the exclusion of the spiritual founded in the intellectual, the concept of science, be it the science of human psychology or otherwise. “Proof” is the buzzword, a strange choice since proof of this overriding human need to feel comfortable in an uncomfortable world has never been proven, but is itself founded on the “discoveries” suggested by psychologists and sociologists and hardly based in solid scientific irrefutable fact. Much of McCloskey’s so called scientific approach falls far short of anything resembling proof.
Consider McCloskey’s cosmological argument as examined by Privette (2009). “McCloskey argued that the cosmological argument was an argument from the existence of the world, as we know it. He stated that believing in an uncaused first cause of the universe is a problem because nothing about our universe forces us to that conclusion.”3 I agree with Privette and would use the following argument, as she has, with a few of my own thoughts added on the concept of contingencies. If
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
In this essay, I will comment by writing: 1) what elements of Christian ministry are highlighted in the chosen readings of Luke 4:16-21 and James 2:14-17; 2) how I can comment on today’s society from the perspective of Luke 16:19-25 and take an actionable response; 3) how my service relates to the elements of ministry in these passages—giving specific examples of people I’ve met and experiences I’ve had in serving them; and 4) a prayer which I created which reflects what I’ve learned and what graces I’ve received in Christian Service.
One philosopher, theorist, or thinker comes up with an argument only to be contested by other lines of thought. McCloskey is perhaps one of the philosophers who have given the issue of existence of God a deep thought. His arguments on the article “On Being an Atheist” present a wide dimension of thought, discussion, and critique.
It does not occur at an instance but seems to be a continuous process. This has led to the saying that “Learning is a lifetime experience”. Learning experiences present themselves to people in everyday activities through the things they engage in. We encounter different situations in the course of our daily chores helping us learn without our realization.
Michael Martin, a well known philosopher of Atheism defines the Atheism in the dimensions of positive and negative atheism. The positive atheist simply denies the existence of god whereas the negative atheist believe that there is minimal, very less or even hardly any intervention of god in our world where we live.
sideration. Role at the Service Site My role at the service site of Christian Services is to assist the calling-center hanger with the critical analysis of the questionnaires in terms of its data efficiency. I consider my service role as quite significant because it helps the organization in identifying the actual requirements of the community and thereby serving their needs with greater efficiency.
Nevertheless, as long as one uses a different basis for his belief, then he can never possibly argue against someone who is arguing from a different context. The theists argue from one point of view while the atheists argue from a different one. Nevertheless, if one disregards the supernatural and if one uses as his basis only what man knows and what he can possibly know, then most of McCloskey’s arguments that there is no God are logically sound and true.
In this regard, there have been several points of view about God’s existence that include both cosmological and teleological ones. Concerning these arguments, H.J McCloskey wrote an article in which he portrays these arguments as false because of lack of substantive proof.
The extent of such adherence needs to be assessed based on evaluation in practical life. Where efforts are needed it is essential that positive aspects that would ensure an invoking of healthy thoughts for discerning the
Some of these analysis techniques also provide the indicators with which a worker will use to ascertain whether the task is going to be successful or not. Evaluation method (Duignan 2008) should be selected on the basis that
leaders whose extravagant living demonstrated a questionable state of spirituality in the sight of the humanists who had thought profoundly about the influence of their society and religion at the time. Where life of faith and justification emerged to be the theme of change in
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Response Paper on On Being an Atheist, by H. J. McCloskey From a Christian Viewpoint for FREE!