Download file to see previous pages...
These terrorist groups also have the latest in satellite imaging, in weapons technology, in biological and chemical weapons capability, and even cyber-terrorism. And they are not afraid to use these weapons and technological advancements on as many people as possible. They are not bound to honor the laws of man and of God in unleashing these weapons; but the different countries and governments trying to counter these terrorist attacks and weapons are pressured to abide by their laws. And because of terrorists’ disregard for laws coupled with their potential to wreak havoc on people’s lives, I believe that stronger means must be employed in order to protect and ensure our safety and security. There are necessary measures, like the curtailment of civil liberties, which have to be employed in order to counter the threat of terrorism.
An opinion survey conducted by YouGov in the UK sought people’s perception or opinion about the government’s proposal to control civil liberties and the survey revealed that a great majority of respondents believe that it is appropriate to curtail the movements of terrorist suspects even if the usual trial policies cannot be applied to them. The survey also revealed that most people favored preemptive actions to be taken by the government in order to control or address the threat of terrorism (2). Majority of the respondents also set forth that they do not accept the idea that government authorities can never curtail anyone’s civil liberties, especially when it is essential to their national security (2). In the same survey, the respondents were asked if they rated national security as more important than the protection of their civil liberties. Again, majority of the respondents believed that national security is more important to them, and only about 3% answered that their civil liberties were more
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
It is due to this role that the police are accorded the powers of arresting and taking into custody those citizens whom they feel that they have reasonable grounds to warrant an arrest. It may be important to note that the arrested person is denied some of the fundamental rights such as the freedom of movement, freedom of association among others but it is also necessary to mention that this does not warrant inhumane treatment as detainees are also protected by the same laws which define the expected code of conduct to be observed by the arresting officers at the time of arrest through to the time justice is dispensed on the accused (Smith, 2010).
It is for this reason that government intercepts in many activities without warrants or information to the person involved. A question at this point is asked by many as to which information should be classified and which should not be? In such a world the limitations that are put on our rights have been argued by many.
Sometimes a rapid solution may be sought to counter the problem that the society faces. Security concern in United States is a great concern of the federal government because of many ugly incidences of terrorism that has claimed thousands of lives of Americans.
This paper will explore among other things, the benefits of civil liberties, police simulation programs and how the police are an essential in upholding, protecting and ensuring every citizen has equal access to civil liberties. Police officer stimulation is necessary for all police officers in the United States of America should undergo in order to efficiently execute the constitutional role required to protect civil liberties.
However, there have been instances when the state itself deprived its citizens of these rights. Example of Imam Jamil Al-Amin is one such example of infringements of basic civil rights. Jamil Al-Amin is a dominant name in the history of African Americans and their struggle for civil rights.
Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights1Convention states that: "Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. There shall be no interference by a public authorityexcept in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others".
The author states that SOCA legislative action specifically arose in response to the four bombs exploding in London as being to “combat serious and organized crime, within and across force boundaries,” creating a further range of new powers for the police, over and above the expanded powers that have already been granted through the Terrorism bill.
The intention behind terrorism is irrelevant to the context as the consequence of this act is exceedingly alarming. From a consequentialist perspective, the act becomes unethical because terrorism causes immeasurable loss and adversities to humanity. Terrorists tend
One of the controversial liberties is the liberty to take one’s own life. The issue often occurs when the patient is terminally ill. Most patients do not want to continue their suffering (Blanco, 2014). Consequently, some request their medical doctors to end the
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic The threat of terrorism warrants the curtailment of civil liberties (Persuasion essay) for FREE!