Nobody downloaded yet


Comments (0) Cite this document
The injuria is the action that causes the harm, therefore the two must co-exist. To bring a successful claim for a tort the claimant has to show that the damnum is a…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.7% of users find it useful
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "THE ENGLISH LAW OF TORT"

Download file to see previous pages This was demonstrated in the case of Best v Samuel Fox & Co Ltd 1 in which a wife attempted to sue her husband’s employers for his inability to have intercourse with her, due to an accident at work that had left him emasculated. The claim failed on the basis that the claimant had no proprietary right over her husband, and therefore no injuria had been suffered by the claimant.
In contrast, however, it is possible for a claim to be brought where no damage has been suffered. This could occur in the case of the tort of trespass and libel. Merely entering onto the land of another without their consent can be actionable, even of the trespasser causes no damage to the land. Likewise, with libel, the publication of the libel can result in an action being brought by the claimant, without requiring the claimant to prove that any loss was suffered as a result of the wrong.
In order to prove that the injuria has caused the damnum it is not necessary to prove the intent of the person causing the harm. Even when intent can be proven, the court can determine that the action of the defendant is not illegal, and therefore not actionable. This was determined in The Mayor of Bradford (Bradford Corporation) v Pickles (1895)2 , in which the defendant placed a well on his land, knowing that this would interrupt the water supply of the town and discolour it. Although in this case the motive of the defendant was malicious, the court ruled that his actions were legal as he was entitled to do whatever he liked on his own land3. Conversely, in Wilkinson v Downton (1897)4, the claimant successfully claimed damages, despite the fact that the harm was caused as a result of a joke, and the defendant lacked any intention to cause harm to the claimant.
Intention can be of relevance in bringing a claim in cases of malicious prosecution5, falsehood6, or defamation7 as well as in claims for nuisance. One such case where nuisance was established as actionable was ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“THE ENGLISH LAW OF TORT Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 4500 words”, n.d.)
THE ENGLISH LAW OF TORT Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 4500 words. Retrieved from
(THE ENGLISH LAW OF TORT Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 4500 Words)
THE ENGLISH LAW OF TORT Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 4500 Words.
“THE ENGLISH LAW OF TORT Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 4500 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document


Tort Law

...Law December 19, Tort Law In this case, law mainly talks about gas leakage occurred in a pub. Alan was the landlord of that particular pub. In case of a contract, the responsibility is imposed by a contract among the parties, while in tort the duty already stands direct by the act without any alternative. Besides, in a contractual relationship, the responsibility imposed by law is in the directions of the other party, by whom there is privity of agreement. In tort, the responsibility lies in the directions of the members of the public or world at large, with whom there is no requirement for any contract. “A...
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment

Tort law

...? Tort Law of the of the Tort Law Nervous shock is the term used by the legal profession for psychiatric injury. Such injury can be accompanied by physical symptoms. For instance, a heart attack could be engendered by psychiatric injury. A claimant for nervous shock has to submit evidence of having undergone serious psychiatric injury. Moreover, such psychiatric injury should be other than passing sorrow or fear. Such claims have to be supported by medical evidence, and the judiciary has depicted willingness to lend credence to claims entailing nervous shock.1 In order to advise Newns store in respect of its liability against its customers, the following issues have to be...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay


... York:Oxford University Press, 2010. Print. 5. Misrepresentation Act 1967 6. Pasley v. Freeman (1789) 7. Richards P. Law of contract.8thedition. Edinburgh gate: Pearson Education Limited, 2007. 8. Rowley & Ors v Secretary of State for Department of Work and Pensions (2007) 9. Turner, C., Hodge, S. Unlocking Torts.3rd ed. London: Hodder Education, 2010. Print 10. Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977, sec. 2 11. Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999, Section 5 12. Wild C., Weinstein S.,. Smith and Keenan’ English Law. Text and Cases. 16th edition. Pearson Education, 2010. 13. Winfield & Jolowicz. Tort. Sweet & Maxwell, 2010. Print... ?TORT ESSAY In Fred’s situation, the legal regulations regarding the...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay


...? TORT LAW Institute The issue in this question requires an analysis of Occupiers Liability Act 1957 and 1984. The Acts have not defined what an occupier means, the only decisive element is that there must be control of the premises. A detailed discussion in respect an occupier was provided in the decision of Wheat v Lacon1. In respect of the facts at hand it is evident that Eric is the owner of the museum and has sufficient control over the premises to be considered as an occupier. Occupiers Liability Act 1957 deals with lawful visitors as described in s.1(2) whereby a common duty of care is owed to such visitors. The status of the entrant is quite easily that of a...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Tort Law

...?Tort law Introduction A tort suit is unlike a criminal case, which is instigated and subsequently managed by the it is prosecuted and subsequently managed by the victim or the family of the victim. When such a suit is successful, the results are not in the form of sentencing but rather in a judgment of liability1. This mode of judgment usually entails the plaintiff being compensated financially by the defendant. Simply put, the plaintiff is given the opportunity to transfer the financial burden that has come as a result of the injury, to the defendant. However, in some instances the defendant may be awarded more than the amount due as compensatory relief. This additional amount is known as punitive damages. Similarly, there may... be...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Tort law

...? Tort law Tort Law Tort law is one of the widely applied laws in the English common law. It cuts across from the social to theprofessional fields. It is widely used as a measure to govern the people against any form of injury or harm from those people who are considered to be responsible of their well-being. In essence, it provides civil action against people who fail to act responsibly towards their duty and hence causing harm to those under their care. Due to its common use in determining court cases, a few matters have risen a point of concern in this law during its...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

There is general duty under english tort law to rescue or assist other. there is only a duty not to actively cause harm. neverth

...? Law of Torts: Exceptions Law of Torts: Exceptions The law of torts generally does not require for one to be duty bound to rescueanother person. Various debates, however, have been conducted in relation to this but courts have refused to alter the judgment. This they mainly attribute to the value of individualism within the society that makes every person favor themselves especially in the face of danger and risk for survival. Another major reason is the unworkability of the rule requiring rescue due to definition of terms it is mandated and when it is not. The rising discomforts to this rule have led to various states giving exceptions...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

English Tort Law

...English Tort Law Section A Q1 Gracie may be held liable for tort for the broken ankle suffered by Brenda and not the employer, under tort for vicarious liability, because the act in issue did not occur in the course of employment as contemplated in the Salmond Test. According to the test, “A master is not responsible for a wrongful act done by his servant unless it is done in the course of employment. It is deemed to be so done if it is either (a) a wrongful act authorised by the master, or (b) a wrongful and an unauthorised mode of doing some act authorised by the master” (cited Steele 2007 575). However, in the case of Lister v Hesley Hall Ltd [2001]...
68 Pages(17000 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic THE ENGLISH LAW OF TORT for FREE!

Contact Us