Game Thoery-Science - Essay Example

Game Theory: Single-move Game Unlike the scenario of reciprocal altruism, in game theory there is a delay while reciprocating and thus providing an environment that is conducive where the involved can cheat as well as fail to reciprocate the act of altruism. Thus, individuals are more precisely playing a game. Game theory is the extension of this and which is realized while seeking to model outcomes and moves that are possible. (utoronto.ca, 1998)This is a study set out to make an analysis and have a comprehensive answer to, “What is a single-move game in game theory?

” To this, the interactive tasks will be tried out first hand besides the views of the author usage.In game theory, a situation of cooperative behavior is referred to as non-zero type game since both individuals playing end up sharing the survival interest. Where there is no cooperation leading to one player winning at another’s expense this translates to a zero-sum kind of game.The interactive tasks are going to be centered on the “Prisoner’s Dilemma”. Prisoner’s Dilemma is an expression describing a non-zero type of game where some reciprocal moves or behaviors are approximated.

An assumption is made under the game of prisoner’s dilemma. One imagines that they (with a partner) are arrested with a minor crime of stealing goods and which is punished by way of a 2-year jail term. However, the police are convinced that you are the culprit and through this you should serve an 8-year term, but they are devoid of proof that either of you is the doer of the act. They subsequently do separate you for questioning. Each of the individuals involved is offered with a choice by the police, to either cooperate or defect.

By cooperating one remains mum to ensure cooperation with the partner. At least you could get a 2-year jail term and the partner could be convicted with a minor crime. A defection means that one implicates the partner in the crime. Therefore, through defection the police are set to do away with the minor charges put against you and thus, could go without punishment.A payoff matrix will be as follows:Matrix 1.Your partner Defect Cooperate You Defect CooperateWhile making a move, I chose to defect and the matrix output is 0 years in jail and the computer cooperated thus resulting to the following matrix:Matrix 2.

Your partner Defect Cooperate You Defect Cooperate Judging from other players’ moves average the cooperative move had a 9.2-year prison term while defect group had a 7.2-year term in prison. Therefore, on average defect has the best outcome. Further, looking at the extent of logic the move is, if the partner decides to cooperate then one should defect because 0 years would be apt than 2 years in jail. On the other hand, if the partner decides to defect then one should do the same since a prison term of 8 years is apt in comparison to 10 years.

Based on this, defection should be the way to go regardless of the partner’s intent and thus, the most logical move. (utoronto.ca, 1998) Work Cited:Utoronto.ca. Evolution of Cooperation. (1998). Retrieved June 20, 2009 http://bio150.chass.utoronto.ca/pdgame/theory.html