Morals vs Ethics - Essay Example

Both ethical and moral constructs coming to the rescue of the environmental talk is significant from the onset of such discussions. The reason for the same lies in the fact that the environment has a huge role in the lives of the people and hence following the activities and processes in a very moral and ethical fashion would indeed be the best-case scenario. Environmental decision-making must always be judged from the light of the ethical domains since there is a great deal of understanding which can be derived. The people could be given options that will eventually become the cornerstone as far as changing their lives are concerned. The morality conundrum gains importance with each passing day since environmental decision-making has gained its due share within the midst of things. The comparison of morality with ethics must not come in the way of environmental decision-making since this is something that could be solved if both moral and ethical domains are kept in close check of one another. However, the argument stems from the fact that morals and ethics are distinguished against one another, which in essence means that there are ambiguities for all and sundry, in the long run. Environmental decision-making thus becomes a non-issue in the fight for survival for morality and ethics.

The interesting debate of morals vs. ethics is helpful as far as degrading the environment and its pertinent decisions are concerned. The reason for the same is that morality is a much-cherished priority for the people and hence following the dictum within the environmental decision-making scenarios becomes an even more desired proposition. Environmental decision-making is hard to make – the fact that there are judgments drawn every now and so often, alternatives found on each and every pathway, both short-term and long-term decisions studied in depth, and thus a clear-cut approach is manifested by the people who matter the most within the environmental decision-making processes. The contrasting mannerisms related to morals and ethics in the discussion of the environmental decision-making processes bring to light the notion of ‘doing it right’ and that too on a proactive and consistent basis. (Brewer & Stern, 2005) What this does is to document a clear-cut beginning for the steps that will indeed be taken within the environmental folds and which will ultimately prove to be significant in the long run. More than anything else, it is the fight between morality and ethics that brings a bad taste in the mouth as far as the environmental decision-making processes and strategies are concerned. What the decision-makers must understand is the fact that the stakeholders of such environmental decisions would entail nearly all the society members as well as the plants, animals, and other eco-system members, and hence the need should be to refurbish the environment as a result of the steps that they have undertaken. This will prove to be a blessing in the long run, all said and done.