Kant vs. Aristotle - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Kant and Aristotle both view duty as something that comes, not just from what is lawful or what is expected, but from the inside. Morality has nothing to do with what is expected, but from the character-the inner strength and disposition. However, that is where the similarities end…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.3% of users find it useful
Kant vs. Aristotle
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Kant vs. Aristotle"

Download file to see previous pages Duty is reasons-choice is freedom, and when you can choose what to do, morality and ethics take a back seat. What is considered moral to some people may not be empowering to all people, and when someone says, "This is moral-this is what you have a duty to do. Therefore it is the law", not everyone may agree and will become disempowered when they are required to do the duty. Morality is nothing more than self-delusion and exaggerated conceit. (Timmermann, 10) What one person considers "saintly", may just be "normal" to someone else, and therefore not a moral or ethical duty.
An example of this would be when someone invites a homeless person into their home for a meal. Others may think this is a "saintly" act, but the person who invited the homeless person may just consider it a routine, daily activity-because it is in their nature to do so. It may not be a matter of morality or ethics to this person, but as a normal way of being for him or her-a normal response to the commitment he or she made about a particular issue.
According to Timmerman, Kant believes that an action is only moral when done in the sphere of duty. It cannot be supererogatory, nor can it be a matter of choice. When done from duty, it is what a person is obligated to do, and it is moral, but it is not freedom. Kant says this because good is not measured in more or lesser degrees. (Timmermann, 14) One cannot be expected to perform extravagant acts if the person chooses not to. Duty would make a person perform a certain act, but it there were no duty, the act would not be performed.
On the other hand, Aristotle says that a just action does not need to be required to be chosen to be done. This means that just because an action is required by law, does not mean that it has to be done. Reasons are excuses-why need reasons to be great Why require reasons to do what is just Do it because you proclaim it needs to be done. The act doesn't matter-it's who you are being that matters.
Example-someone who saves another person's life just for the fame and glory is doing it from an unstable disposition. But the person who saves another person's life because it needs to happen is doing that from a stable disposition. According to Aristotle, it is better to be humble and do just and fair acts; than to do an act for dishonorable reasons. When a person just wants the fame and glory, they are not really interested in contributing to the human condition-they are acting from a selfish perspective. To be truly honorable, according to Aristotle, the act must spring from who that person is being.
He sees that who a person is being is more important than what that person does. If a person is being selfish, that is also what the person does. Selfish acts come from a selfish disposition. But when a person is being loving, then loving acts come out. Actions are just the overflow of the character-who we are being. Development of character has three phases: 1) who we are being, 2) what we do, and 3) what we have. When the first one is not complete, we are not complete as a whole. Action comes second to who we are being, and Aristotle believed that when someone's actions are incongruent with who they are being, then the actions are invalid.
Kant, however, believed that choice was more important than duty, and when someone is free to choose what they want to do, they are living in a higher space than someone who is doing something out of duty, because it is "moral". Duty dictates what we "should" do, while ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Kant vs. Aristotle Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Kant vs. Aristotle Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1529148-kant-vs-aristotle
(Kant Vs. Aristotle Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
Kant Vs. Aristotle Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1529148-kant-vs-aristotle.
“Kant Vs. Aristotle Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1529148-kant-vs-aristotle.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Kant vs. Aristotle

Kant vs Mill

...of happiness. He makes a drastic shift from the descriptive claim to the prescriptive without sufficiently explaining the relation between them. In addition to that, I believe in rationalism instead of empiricism. I do grant that others’ experiences make a great source of education for us, though I maintain that our personal experiences play the biggest role in developing our beliefs. I completely agree with the distinction Kant makes between the nominal and the phenomenal reality. There is no doubt in the fact that what offers pleasure is often morally correct, but this is never always the case. Taking this into consideration, I would favor Kant’s philosophy in comparison to Mill’s. By saying this, I do...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Medieval Philosophy / History

..., such as “what is happiness?” Over the course of almost two years, I worked independently and with a pastoral advisor to help understand my spirituality. My interest in studying the most fundamental questions of human existence, led me to the study of Philosophy. I began reading some of the great works by Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas and many others. Once I began my formal education, I took several philosophy classes which required me to analyze several texts and create my own philosophical writings. The reading and writing I did helped both to familiarize me with the major Western philosophers and their theories, and to obtain depth in understanding about the major problems they were trying to answer. What is Philosophy?...
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper

Kant

...Lecturer’s According to Kant, human beings and all other creatures that are rational tend to not only have ends but also have intrinsic value. Because of this, he states that it is not moral for human beings to use each other as means for their own ends. Kant further states that the principle of humanity and any creature that is rational as an end in itself are not borrowed from experience, moreover it is clear that all those rational beings are members of a universal kingdom of ends. In addition, these laws are not only made by these beings, but these beings are also subject to the laws, which have been made. Every rational or human nature is based on the autonomy of the beings, which is practiced by...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Kant vs. Mill

...Answer A Emmanual Kant, eminent philosopher and one of the most influential thinkers of modern times, has been quite vocal in discussing the moral and ethical values of man. He says that moral obligations are imperatives and his two Rules define the categorical imperatives: Rules of Universality; and Rules of Respect (Kant, 2004). The first one makes says that people at all time must act appropriately and the second rules promotes the value of respect and says that well being of all individuals is important and therefore, one should not use others for their own vested interests. In other words, he says that one must act in a manner that one would expect others to act towards oneself. This Kantian ethical theory is popular because... ’...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Philosophy - Aristotle vs Plato

... and inconsistent. In contrast his theory of knowledge begins from the sensation of physical reality. Works Cited Aristotle, “The Aim of Man”, The World of Ideas. Ed. Lee A. Jacobus. Boston: Bedford/St. Martins, 2010. Plato, “The Allegory of the Cave”, The World of Ideas. Ed. Lee A. Jacobus. Boston: Bedford/St. Martins, 2010. Richard, C. W. Clarke. “Theory of Being or Reality (Metaphysics)”, 23 November, 2010. Available at Thomas, John. “Plato vs. Aristotle”, 23 November, 2010. Available at ... Plato’s ivity and Aristotle’s Objectivity of Knowledge and Reality Plato’s and Aristotle’s philosophies of realityand knowledge are different from each other in the sense that when Plato emphasizes a subjective...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Aristotle, Mill, Kant

...1. and explain Aristotle’s account of moral virtue According to Aristotle, moral virtue refers to a of character that falls in between deficiency and excess. In addition, Aristotle believes that there needs to be a clear-cut distinction between the intellectual and moral virtues. Moral virtues are concerned with feelings, choices and decisions while intellectual ones are those virtues that result from education. Aristotle also believes that happiness is not achievable unless the person in pursuit of it has attained the state of morality (Talbot, 2005). 2. State and explain Mill’s supreme moral principle  Mill’s supreme moral principal states that: "The creed which...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Plato Euthyphro, Aristotle, Hobbes, Hume, Kant

...of things are different, as an action loved is said to be loved because someone is loving it. When someone does not love the action then it is not an action loved anymore. 4. Socrates tells Euthryphro that he is only citing examples of pious actions. 5. Socrates might raise the question what about the different views of the gods about pious actions. What if an action is pious for one god but not pious for another? How will it be reconciled then? 1. Aristotle claims that we gain virtues by adaptation, and this I believe is true. I believe that humans are not naturally good or evil, we just absorb whatever it is that we are socially exposed to. As we mature, we learn to question things so we begin to choose for ourselves...
6 Pages(1500 words)Assignment

Plato vs Aristotle

... Leadership: Plato versus Aristotle Aristotle was more likely to believe the truth based on scientific inquiries, which wasdifferent from Plato who believed the truth as based on reason alone. For this matter, their views on leadership are substantially diverged in a sense that the former was more likely to use practical inquiries with substantial proofs, but the latter relied on reasons alone. This concept is clear in “Aristotle’s Ethics,” where Aristotle rejected Plato’s idea of training in the sciences and metaphysics as essential components to achieve maximum understanding of our good (Radden and Sadler 168). For Aristotle, appreciation of “goods” like friendship, pleasure, virtue and more is what only required to living well... ...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Discuss the difference between Aristotle and Kant

... Difference between Aristotle and Kant Introduction Aristotle and Emmanuel Kant feature as two of the most prominent philosophers of their respective times. Aristotle and Kant made substantial contribution on philosophical areas of ethics, logic, metaphysics and social theory among other disciplines. With respect to the philosophy calendar, Aristotle and Kant lived centuries apart. Aristotle was a classical philosopher from ancient Greece who lived between 384 - 322 B.C.E. Aristotle was a student of Plato, another great philosopher from the classical era. Conventionally, Aristotle is referred to as the father of logic (Graham, 16). In philosophy classes, one is likely to learn about Aristotle’s system of propositional logic where... the...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Knowledge

...maxim (Coles, 2010) 6. Understanding the concept of skeptics Philosophical Skepticism vs. Ordinary Incredulity Forms of Philosophical Skepticism Religious an physical skepticism Moore against the new skeptics Argument for skepticism about our common-sense beliefs about the world around us Critically analyze the Friendship in Aristotles Nicomachean Ethics SELF 1. -The ancient theories of soul The Greek Notion of soul Presocratic thinking about the Soul Understanding of Plato’s Tripartite, Understanding the concept of Socratic intellectualist theory which advocated for the Protagoras and why/how Plato moved away from this. Plato’s soul division and the theory of the mental...
6 Pages(1500 words)Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Kant vs. Aristotle for FREE!

Contact Us