Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Go to advanced search...

Kant vs. Aristotle - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Kant and Aristotle both view duty as something that comes, not just from what is lawful or what is expected, but from the inside. Morality has nothing to do with what is expected, but from the character-the inner strength and disposition. However, that is where the similarities end…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.6% of users find it useful
Kant vs. Aristotle
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Kant vs. Aristotle"

Download file to see previous pages Duty is reasons-choice is freedom, and when you can choose what to do, morality and ethics take a back seat. What is considered moral to some people may not be empowering to all people, and when someone says, "This is moral-this is what you have a duty to do. Therefore it is the law", not everyone may agree and will become disempowered when they are required to do the duty. Morality is nothing more than self-delusion and exaggerated conceit. (Timmermann, 10) What one person considers "saintly", may just be "normal" to someone else, and therefore not a moral or ethical duty.
An example of this would be when someone invites a homeless person into their home for a meal. Others may think this is a "saintly" act, but the person who invited the homeless person may just consider it a routine, daily activity-because it is in their nature to do so. It may not be a matter of morality or ethics to this person, but as a normal way of being for him or her-a normal response to the commitment he or she made about a particular issue.
According to Timmerman, Kant believes that an action is only moral when done in the sphere of duty. It cannot be supererogatory, nor can it be a matter of choice. When done from duty, it is what a person is obligated to do, and it is moral, but it is not freedom. Kant says this because good is not measured in more or lesser degrees. (Timmermann, 14) One cannot be expected to perform extravagant acts if the person chooses not to. Duty would make a person perform a certain act, but it there were no duty, the act would not be performed.
On the other hand, Aristotle says that a just action does not need to be required to be chosen to be done. This means that just because an action is required by law, does not mean that it has to be done. Reasons are excuses-why need reasons to be great Why require reasons to do what is just Do it because you proclaim it needs to be done. The act doesn't matter-it's who you are being that matters.
Example-someone who saves another person's life just for the fame and glory is doing it from an unstable disposition. But the person who saves another person's life because it needs to happen is doing that from a stable disposition. According to Aristotle, it is better to be humble and do just and fair acts; than to do an act for dishonorable reasons. When a person just wants the fame and glory, they are not really interested in contributing to the human condition-they are acting from a selfish perspective. To be truly honorable, according to Aristotle, the act must spring from who that person is being.
He sees that who a person is being is more important than what that person does. If a person is being selfish, that is also what the person does. Selfish acts come from a selfish disposition. But when a person is being loving, then loving acts come out. Actions are just the overflow of the character-who we are being. Development of character has three phases: 1) who we are being, 2) what we do, and 3) what we have. When the first one is not complete, we are not complete as a whole. Action comes second to who we are being, and Aristotle believed that when someone's actions are incongruent with who they are being, then the actions are invalid.
Kant, however, believed that choice was more important than duty, and when someone is free to choose what they want to do, they are living in a higher space than someone who is doing something out of duty, because it is "moral". Duty dictates what we "should" do, while ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Kant vs. Aristotle Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Kant vs. Aristotle Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words. Retrieved from
(Kant Vs. Aristotle Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
Kant Vs. Aristotle Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words.
“Kant Vs. Aristotle Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document


American Independent Cinema: Hollywood vs. the Independent

... of the pаper: Аmericаn Independent Cinemа - Hollywood vs. the Independent Beginning аs а group of smаll-time entrepreneurs in the volаtile domestic mаrket, U.S. film compаnies, аfter World Wаr I, quickly blossomed into one of the worlds foremost culturаl industries. Despite the bitter resistаnce of foreign governments, elites, аnd filmmаkers, Аmericаn movies hаve estаblished а stronghold in а myriаd of foreign mаrkets, enthrаlling millions of movie-goers аcross the globe. The remаrkаble success of this entertаinment enterprise hаs mаde it а subject worthy of serious inquiry. Whаt аccounted for Hollywood’s populаrity, the compаny thаt wаs а tycoon in its industry yeаrs аgo аnd thаt got аttаcked by the competition of independent compаnies...
13 Pages(3250 words)Term Paper

Symbolic vs. Functional Recruitment: Wendys

There is social inequality in India, a difference like lack of teamwork, managers like working individually unlike the Americans, the Indians give priority to culture and family over work while for the Americans work takes precedence. Both are risk-takers and developing personal relations is important for the American while it isn’t for the Indians. Such differences can make it difficult for them to work together.
The next part of the report focuses on expatriation and repatriation. The national culture might make it difficult for the expatriates to adjust unless laws and regulations are established to initiate an effort to encourage better-coordinated work between the two. The expatriates might feel insecure about thei...
16 Pages(4000 words)Assignment

America Vs Let America be America

His poem “Let America be America”
When Claude McKay was just twenty years old, he published his first book of verses titled “Songs of Jamaica” which dealt with his impressions of Black life in America. He wrote on various subjects that included love and romance using very passionate language. Later on, the main themes he wrote on, time and again was about the sufferings and injustice meted out to the blacks in America. In the earlier part of the twentieth century, his literary achievements had a great influence on the Harlem Renaissance. He was greatly respected by the younger generation
Langston Hughes completed his college education at Lincoln University, Pennsylvania. It was at Lincoln, Illinoi...
7 Pages(1750 words)Book Report/Review

Cultural Value Orientations: German vs. Turkish

When organizational culture is discussed in the context of national culture, it is based on certain assumptions. According to Schein (2004 qt. Browaeys and Price 2008) culture can be defined as:

"...a set of basic assumptions - shared solutions to universal problems of external adaptation (how to survive) and internal integration (how to stay together) - which have evolved over time and are handed down from one generation to the next".

External adaptation here refers to factors or culture which the management can control while internal integration means the relationship which binds them to the group. In this context management styles and approaches are often influenced by the cultural value orientation - that...
7 Pages(1750 words)Case Study

The British Constitution vs The Human Rights Act 1998

This research essay analyses the above statement and arrives at a conclusion.
Integration of the provisions of ECHR into U.K’s domestic law by way of HRA 1998 can be regarded as revolutionary as it facilitates the majority of the ECHR rights provisions directly applicable in the U.K. Before that integration, a U.K Court has to presume that when there is a clash between U.K’s domestic law and ECHR rights provision, the ECHR rights provision will always prevail. This principle has been laid down in R v Secretary of Home Dept ex parte Brind1 and R v Secretary of Home Dept ex parte Thakrar. 2
Courts have now the power to declare any statue which they find incompatible with ECHR provisions and order for fine-tunin...
9 Pages(2250 words)Case Study

Kant: Self-Determination in the Age of Reason

... Immanuel Kant Philosophy is the study of different thoughts and how the world works. There have always been philosophers who have studied many ideas and written about them. Most of the time they studied how life worked and how people perceived things. One of the ideas philosophers studied was metaphysics. THE VARIETIES OF ETHICAL THEORY Ethics have been studied for thousands of years and there are many varieties. According to Richard T. Hull there are two types of fundamental ethical theories: those that say a person should choose their actions to "maximize the value or values to be expected as consequences of those actions" (Hull 1) or those that say a person should chose their actions according to a certain standard of duty...
8 Pages(2000 words)Assignment

John Rawls vs Robert Nozick: Social Justice

It is logical to look at political philosophy within the framework of history and ethics emerging from it. As could be observed, the question of justice, and how we perceive its nature has remained the prime concern throughout history. This will include, among other things, the existence of specific obligations towards each other and towards the state, the existence of natural rights, claims of property/liberty and equality.

In face of this, the Anglo-American political philosophy has seen famous philosophers like John Rowels, Robert Nozick and recently Amritya Sen to focus on issues and arguments concerning the above...(political Philosophy, 2005 pp1)

As political philosophy is about politics mainly, it s...

6 Pages(1500 words)Coursework

The Theories of Kant and Plato

... the originality of the phenomena, dependability of the existence of any phenomena and the divisions of all phenomena ("SECTION I. System of Cosmological Ideas."). Considering the overall structure based on the experiences, it is very much possible to come up with several claims about the reality which are contradictory to each other. Few ideas of this genre include infinity vs. finitude, complexity vs. simplicity, contingency vs. necessity or determinism vs. freedom. These are termed as ‘Antinomies of Pure Reason’ which could be evaded only when it is recognized that the proofs in support of each antinomy is correct for the particular phenomenal realm concerning it (Kant: Knowledge). The cosmological as well as psychological concept...
6 Pages(1500 words)Assignment

The Awakening: A Battle of Individuality vs. Conformity

... 09 December The Awakening: A Battle of Individuality vs. Conformity This research paper seeks to illustrate that the novel “The Awakening” authored by the famous Kate Chopin is based on a battle of individuality vs. conformity. More than anything else, this novel seeks to portray this battle and establish how difficult it was for a woman of the 19th century to maintain her individuality. Edna, the protagonist in the novel, favors individuality over conformity and her life becomes increasingly difficult consequently. Following discussion aims to reinforce this reality that in the battle of individuality vs. conformity, a woman undergoes a lot of suffering because it is not easy to opt for individuality when the whole society wants her...
7 Pages(1750 words)Research Paper

Old Myths vs Modern Empires

In the modern world, American society has been facing constant challenges from the Islamic jihadist groups due to which significant invasions were made in the Islamic countries, such as Afghanistan.

The main differences between the approaches made by American society and the Barbarian society were the purpose behind the invasions. The American society invaded Afghanistan after facing violent attacks from the Islamic anti-social groups. However, the Barbarian invasions in Rome signified the use of power by the leaders in order to capture territories and increase their kingdom. The main purpose behind the attacks made by the U.S. administration was to eliminate the terrorist groups from the world and make the world free f...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Kant vs. Aristotle for FREE!

Contact Us