Nobody downloaded yet

Compare the Federalist and Democratic philosophies of government - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
The Federalist Party was a political party during the First Party System in the United States, from 1792 to 1816. It was formed by Alexander Hamilton who built a network of supporters in the United States Congress and in the states about 1792 to support his fiscal policies; it came to support a strong national government, a loose construction of the United States Constitution, and a more mercantile, less agricultural economy…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91% of users find it useful
Compare the Federalist and Democratic philosophies of government
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Compare the Federalist and Democratic philosophies of government"

Download file to see previous pages With the start of the new government under the Constitution, President George Washington made his former aide de camp, Alexander Hamilton, United States Secretary of the Treasury. Hamilton was immediately tasked with coming up with a plan to restore public credit. Hamilton proposed the fairly ambitious Hamiltonian economic program and organized alliances to get these measures passed through the Congress. The measures he proposed were far from universally popular. In particular, they were well liked by the commercial North, and were heartily disliked by the agrarian South. This spurred James Madison, Hamilton's ally in the fight to establish the United States Constitution, to join with Thomas Jefferson in opposing Hamilton's program.
The Democratic Party evolved from the political factions that opposed Alexander Hamilton's fiscal policies in the early 1790s; these factions are known variously as the Anti-Administration "Party" or the Anti-Federalists. In the mid-1790s, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison organized these factions into a party and helped define its ideology in favor of yeomen farmers, strict construction of the Constitution, and a weaker federal government. ...
The new party was especially effective in building a network of newspapers in major cities to broadcast its statements and editorialize in its favor.
By 1790 or 1791, coalitions were forming in Congress for and against the Hamiltonian program. These were nameless, shifting ad-hoc factions, not permanent political parties. By 1792 or 1793 newspapers started calling Hamilton supporters "Federalists" and the opponents "Republicans".
In 1791, Jefferson and Madison travelled widely looking for alliances with factions and parties at the state level. They had support from the short-lived Democratic-Republican Societies. Their major success came in New York, where long-term governor George Clinton, and ambitious newcomer Aaron Burr, signed up, as Hamilton was the son-in-law of General Schuyler, one of Clinton's enemies. Hamilton likewise realized the need for support in the states; he formed connections with local factions, and used his network of Treasury agents to link together friends of the government, especially businessmen and financiers in the new nation's dozen small cities (Schlisinger 1992).
The state networks of both parties began to operate in 1794 or 1795, thus firmly establishing what has been called The First Party System in all the states. Patronage now became a factor. The winner-take-all election system opened a wide gap between winners, who got all the patronage, and losers who got none. Hamilton had over 2000 Treasury jobs to dispense, while Jefferson had one part-time job in the State Department, which he gave to journalist Philip Freneau; Madison had none. In New York, however, Clinton used dubious methods to win the election for governor and used the vast ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Compare the Federalist and Democratic philosophies of government Essay”, n.d.)
Compare the Federalist and Democratic philosophies of government Essay. Retrieved from
(Compare the Federalist and Democratic Philosophies of Government Essay)
Compare the Federalist and Democratic Philosophies of Government Essay.
“Compare the Federalist and Democratic Philosophies of Government Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Compare the Federalist and Democratic philosophies of government

Federalist vs Anti- federalist

... Question one. The views of the Federalists and the Anti-federalists on the role of the representatives derive from the ways in which each see therole of the federal, or central, government. The Federalists believed in a strong central government and they thought that it would protect the rights of individual citizens. In contrast, the Anti-federalists did not trust a strong central government and favored more the concept of "little republics" or states, each with their laws establishing their own authority to protect citizen rights and exercise power of government. Each of these positions had good and strong reasoning, as represented by James Madison in Federalist Letter #10 and the debating response by the writer 'Brutus'. Today... the...
2 Pages(500 words)Coursework


...for opposing ratification of US constitution. The anti-federalists who regarded constitution as untried were skeptical of its ability to form the finest form of government. They claimed it to be silliness to substitute the existing form of government with an entirely new document. Anti-federalists argued that constitution characterized twin evils of monarchy and aristocracy rather than the democratic goals of American Revolution. The most significant reason for the opposition against the ratification of constitution was the fear of provision for president’s supreme power. Limited restrictions on authority of national government over the...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Federalist Papers

... important papers outlining the broader scope and structure of the constitution of the country besides presenting plausible arguments in favor of the formation of one large State. Federalist 10 actually dealt with how to deal with small factions or interest groups and what should be the overall structure of the State to overcome or control such factions. It is written in continuation of the Federalist 9 and also outlines as to how the existence of such groups can tear apart the whole republic. Federalist 51 discusses as to how an effective system of checks and balance as well as the separation of the powers within the government. This paper will therefore discuss both these papers and will explore some of the key arguments made... and their...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Federalist paper

...Federalist Paper # 10 The Federalist Papers were a series of articles written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. Madison, widely recognized as the Father of the Constitution, would later go on to become President of the United States. Jay would become the first Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court. Hamilton would serve in the Cabinet and become a major force in setting economic policy for the US (The Federalist Papers 1997). Federalist Paper No. 10 is an essay by James Madison and the tenth of the Federalist Papers, a series arguing for the ratification of the United States Constitution. It was published on November 22, 1787, under the...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Federalist Politics government will reside. A major portion of the Federalist papers defined the nature of special interest groups. Madison termed them factions and warned of their ability to wield undue influence. Factions are known by the more modern term special interest groups. By concentrating money and political power a small minority can have a great impact on laws and legislation. Factions can bring about corruption and give a voice to a segment of the population that is unduly loud in comparison with the one man one vote philosophy that underpins our constitutional system. Small, well organized factions can influence local politics, elect friendly delegates, and promote laws that are favorable...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Federalist and anti Federalist debates

..., allocation of powers to executive, legislative and judiciary, and especially the influence each state can contribute in the central government. A famous and insightful Anti-Federalist named Robert Yates, delegate to Constitutional Convention and a New York judge, withdrew in the Convention saying that it was exceeding its powers and instructions and the Supreme Court would soon become a source of over-reaching and unlimited federal powers (Galles, 2006). References: Galles, Gary. The Anti-Federalists Were Right, (2006). Web. 18 September 2011. Føllesdal, Andreas. "Federalism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2010 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Web....
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Federalist Paper

...of actions and contribute to the formation of new political equation. The social change is critical paradigm that accelerates political transformation, introducing new mechanisms of establishing more effective democratic values and processes. People become the agent of changes and their empowered decisions pave way to radical equations of socio-economic and political compulsions. Jay fears that the confederacies of the Union would not be able to restrain invasions from the outside but federal structure, thus envisaged, would be more effective because of its dual nature. The confederacies would be able to focus on development of their people and region while the wider policies of defense etc. would be the responsibility...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Federalist and Democratic-Republican attitudes toward the national government

...Federalist and Democratic-Republican attitudes toward the national government Federalist and Democratic-Republican attitudes toward the national governmentFederalist Party was formed by Alexander Hamilton and was known to be rivals with the Democratic Republican Party, which was created, by James Madison and Thomas Jefferson. The Federalists promoted the financial system, which emphasized on the federal assumption of state debts, a tariff to pay debts, manufacturing, and encouragement of banking. They also believed in a strong central government other than articles of...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Federalist #10 and the Existence of Faction in Modern Government

...Federalist #10 and the Existence of Faction in Modern Government Echoing James Madison’s words, an individual who take the government side does not get into trouble. Many people have brushed the federal laws in a negative way. Historians attribute such incidences to independence of the human mind. A person has the ability to evaluate what the society presents in the name of federal laws, and come up with the most probable way of handling the presented issue. Factors, which hold the social fabric, root for observance of federal system. The question that many people are asking is does the federal system offer political solution to individual needs. I am going to show the despite the...
10 Pages(2500 words)Term Paper

Federalist Papers

...Teacher Federalist Paper No.10 Federalist number 10 was written by James Madison under the pseudonym “Publius” where he proposed themechanism of checks and balances among the several factions in government. Federalist Paper number 10 was published on November 22, 1787 where it contained the argument of the need to ratify the United States Constitution. In this Federalist Paper #10, Madison talked about the weakness presented by a faction in a government but also presented the strength of the solution. The weakness was the faction inherent in every government and the strength is the republic form of...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Compare the Federalist and Democratic philosophies of government for FREE!

Contact Us