We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

Business contract of sale of goods - Case Study Example

Comments (0)
In the prevailing circumstances of Peter and Paul there is an express contract of sale between them and Arthur. Where they agreed that he (Arthur) should deliver to them the pythons on the price (consideration) and the time at which they agreed. On his part Arthur sent Peter a fax to his office as promised confirming that he will deliver pythons as agreed on Wednesday…
Download full paper

Extract of sample
Business contract of sale of goods

Download file to see previous pages... This can be illustrated in the case of Thompson v. Robinson Gun makers (1955)2 here D purchased a standard Vanguard car from P and later P refused to accept the delivery of it. P's profit on the sale would have been 61 pounds, but D argued that they were not liable for this amount, since the profit would still be made when the car was sold to another customer. The court rejected this argument since the supply of this model exceeded the demand. Therefo0re if P had found another customer he could have sold a car to him in addition to selling a car to D.
In this case where Roger is the driver of Reptiles-To-Go he is acting as a servant of the master, therefore any act arising from him during the course of his duty the master will be held liable .This means that Arthur who was hit by Roger will have to sue the master (Reptile-To-Go) for injury he sustained both in person and property. The rule here is that a master is held liable for the damages of his servants that are committed within the course of his employment .The tortuous act must be a wrongful way of doing what the employee is employed to do.
In Limpus v. London General Omnibus Co.1862 3, a bus driver whilst racing a bus caused on the accident .his employees hold liable because he was doing what he was employed to do i.e. driving a bus although in an improper way (K Abbott, K. Ward man .Business law, 7th edition 2001)
Contrast Beard v. London general omnibus Co. (1900)4 a bus conductor attempted to turn a bus around at the end of its route and in doing so he caused an accident. His employers were not held liable since he was employed only to collect fares and not drive buses.
Therefore the employer will always be held liable for the acts of the servant even if the employee acts contrary to clear instructions. Rose v. plenty 19765
On the facts of case where Katie bought some nut that should have been suitable for feeding her pet pot -bellied pig Percy and they eventually died from the said nuts fall under sale by description. In this section the seller will be held responsible for any of the loss caused by the product in which he /she sold to the buyer and where the buyer relies on the seller's knowledge and skill .It is the duty of the seller to offer the buyer the best product that meets his/her description failure to which he will ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
Privity of Contract
The relation between contracting parties is known as the Privity of Contract. The stringency involved in the rule of Privity of Contract is borne out by the fact that a third party cannot claim or sue for damages resulting from a contract to which it is not a party.
24 Pages(6000 words)Case Study
Business Law - the law of contract
Elizabeth explained to James that the correct price for the watch was supposed to be 250 and not 25 as indicated by the price tag. This issue concerns invitation to treat under the law of contract. Marked prices of goods displayed in shop windows or catalogue mentioning prices of goods do not, as a rule constitute an offer as to compel the store person to sell those goods at the marked prices.
6 Pages(1500 words)Case Study
Law of contract- Exclusion causes and privity
The doctrine of privity in contract means that only the parties involved in a contract are allowed to enforce it. It restricts possibility of a third party/beneficiary in enforcing a contract, (Atiyah, 1995). Under the rule of consideration, the consideration has to move from a promisee to the promisor, this raises the doctrine of privity, where each party need to clearly show the people who are the parties in a given contract thereby defining their obligations.
8 Pages(2000 words)Case Study
Contract Law. Westwood Ltds
The remaining toy guns were therefore available at a price of 5 each and Clint duly agreed to purchase 200 of them. It was agreed that delivery would take place on Friday with payment to be made within 7 days of delivery. Westwood Ltd also informed Clint that it had a second-hand drinks vending machine for sale at a price of 1,500.
7 Pages(1750 words)Case Study
Law of Sale
She further wanted to buy paint for decorating the bathroom. Once in the hardware the sales assistant offered paint plus's own brand called Ever-last as the best paint. He did this on the basis of many customers buying and they have never come back to complain.
8 Pages(2000 words)Case Study
The Law of Contract
Contracts are of various kinds. They vary according to the terms of offering and acceptance. Some of the terms are explicit and some of them are merely suggested or implied. Law of contract is not of a recent origin, but had existed since the dawn of human existence, because it is a simple fact that humans cannot deal with each other without some kind of understanding, even in bartering days, and eventually, the same set of ethical and moral rules guiding the transactions emerged as The Contract of Law.
11 Pages(2750 words)Case Study
Commercial law-Sale of goods
(a) Acceptance must be communicated by the offering in the manner prescribed by him otherwise the acceptance is ineffective. This was held in the case of ELIASON v. HENSHAN. In this case, E offered is buy flour from H, asking the reply to be sent by the wagon drives who communicated the offer.
12 Pages(3000 words)Case Study
Business Law - Case study
enforceable contract; namely offer, acceptance and consideration (it is important to note that parties entering into a contract must also have legal capacity to do so and it is presumed from the facts given that capacity is not an issue in this case). Lord Wilberforce asserted the rule for formation of contract in New Zealand Shipping Co Limited v A M Satterthwaite, The Eurymedon1:
8 Pages(2000 words)Case Study
Introduction Business Law
According to theCIF sale of goods act, sphere of application, an agreement to sell is termed as a contract between the seller and the buyer. The following is an obligation to both the seller and the buyer upon an agreement about the
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study
Comerical law. sale of goods
Fraud also comes into play under the UCC because the ABC president had assured John that they used the right material, but in reality they had used “poly roofing,” which degraded material. Under Section 14(2) of the 1994 Sale and Supply of Goods
1 Pages(250 words)Case Study
Let us find you another Case Study on topic Business contract of sale of goods for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us