We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

Platonic and Knowledge-Definition Claims - Essay Example

Comments (0)
The Greek philosopher Plato writes extensively of the dialectic methods used by Socrates. The foundation upon which the Socratic philosophy rests is made up of two principles. First, the Platonic claim where for any concept (C) (like a table), there is some intrinsic feature or combination of features (F's) that all tables have, and which all non-tables lack…
Download full paper

Extract of sample
Platonic and Knowledge-Definition Claims

Download file to see previous pages... I do not agree with the knowledge-definition claim because I think it is possible to recognize a concept (like a book) and have no clue about the elements of a Socratic definition of that concept.
I am very comfortable with the Platonic claim because it relies upon observation and classification. It defines a concept in terms of its characteristics, and eliminates those things which do not exhibit the same elements. In my example of the table, it is very easy to observe the primary elements of tables. A table will have a flat surface upon which something can be placed. It will have some sort of a support structure, whether legs or a post, which elevates the flat surface. It is therefore easy to apply the Platonic claim in seeking to define a table; if an object has a flat surface and a support system, it is a table. Armed with the knowledge of these intrinsic features, even though there are only two in my simplified example, I can confidently identify tables and distinguish them from non-tables.
If an object, say a broom, is presented to me, I can immediately define it in terms of its "table-ness" by looking to the object's characteristics and applying the Platonic claim. A broom does not have a flat surface supported by a stable structure. It may have a flat surface, e.g., the sides of the bristles or the top of the platform that holds the bristles. It certainly has a structure; the handle and bristle binding. But it is not a table because there is not a flat surface where something can be placed while being supported by the structure.
Articulated in Platonic terms, there is the concept of a table (T) that has two features; a flat surface able to accommodate the placement of other things (F1) and a support structure that elevates the surface to a useful height (F2). Therefore, T=F1+F2. For any object under analysis, that particular object cannot be a T if it lacks F1 and F2. T may have diversity within its features, like a surface that is round or rectangular, as long as the primary element of F1 is met. T can have different examples of a support structure, like three or more legs, a central post with feet, etc., as long as the essential characteristics of F2 are met. The object may even have other features, like drawers or decorative elements, which fall outside of the primary definition given here; but as long as the elements of an object exhibit both F1 and F2, it is a table. The broom, lacking these features is then readily identified as something other than a table.
I do not agree with the knowledge-definition claim. This claim asserts that if a person knows what a thing is, they know a Socratic definition of that thing. While I understand the method, and believe that it might have useful applicability in limited scenarios, I think it is possible to recognize an object without knowing what that object truly is. To illustrate the distinction I am making, I will use another simple object; a book. It is certainly possible to recognize a book without understanding what it is. An individual may know that an object with a cover and pages of text is a book. They do not even have to be literate to recognize the object as a book, as they ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
In essence, there is a love and hate relationship between the two people (Voo, 2007); one moment, they are getting along just as friends should, but the next moment the two friends find themselves against each other. A frenemy is often treated accordingly, with everyone being conscious of what that person is.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Describe Plato's philosophical analysis of the nature of knowledge, and explain what conclusions Plato drew for the methodolog
He argues that this doctrine is one that is characterized by one major enduring within the possession of humanity (Cooper 1). According to his findings, the horizon of life is bound by things that human beings see, touchy and handle. In addition, this horizon becomes indefinitely enlarged through the addition of a different type of human being, the type of timeliness, and abstract reality.
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
Platos Theory of Knowledge
Plato was dedicating his writings to someone he had great respect for. His later works do not always feature Socrates though often this was the case. In analyzing Plato's theory of knowledge it is necessary to talk about the myth of the platonic cave.
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
Aristotelian Universals and Platonic Universals
Let us imagine that there are two brown tables in a room. Both the tables have the quality of 'brownness' and according to the Metaphysical philosophers, both these tables share a universal, that is the quality of being brown. Metaphysics states that there are three major types of universals existing, namely, Types or Kinds, Relations and Properties.
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
Socrates of Platonic Dialogue
Socrates devoted himself to free-wheeling discussion with the aristocratic young citizens of Athens, insistently questioning their unwarranted confidence in the truth of popular opinions, even though he often offered them no clear alternative teaching. Socrates pointedly declined to accept payment for his work with students, but despite (or, perhaps, because) of this lofty disdain for material success, many of them were fanatically loyal to him.
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
Rhetorical Theory: Sophistic Rhetoric vs Platonic Rhetoric
ns of persuasion in any given case (Heenan 2007) Plato, on the other hand, uses the term rhetoric to mean its broad, contemporary sense of “the means used to persuade through words.” (McCoy). It is the objective of this essay to evaluate the speech delivered by George
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
When I became a father, I faced the reality of taking care of my children. My support has been from being a role model, provider and mentor. In order for my children to grow well, I have been focused on channeling my efforts
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
History of Philosophy / Essay Question: 'What does the postulation of Forms serve to explain Is there a Form for each property If not, of what properties are there Forms'
With this overview, this essay shall discuss postulation of forms mainly from Plato’s view, where he concurrently has questions for morality while also trying to give a
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
State and defend the deductive argument that God is required for the existence of objective moral laws
Lewis and other theorists have advanced theoretical arguments concerning how facts on morality depend on God, and the strength of their arguments shall be explained below. Three major premises
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
Platonic Philosophy in Contemporary Culture
In the dialogue, Plato emphasized on the importance of acquiring objective knowledge through philosophical education. Apparently, the book’s historical context was characterized
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Let us find you another Essay on topic Platonic and Knowledge-Definition Claims for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us