Parental Socialization and Gender Influences - Essay Example

Running Head: Parents Role Parents Role Parent has an obvious role in every elite gymnast's youth and theirinfluence on children's sport participation and performance is unquestioned, though not comprehensively recognized. Most lately, parental concern in sport has gained national consideration. On a less affirmative note, modern stories of parents assailing coaches or officials show the presence of parents in sport. Parents patrol the tangential, shout encouragement from the bleacher, and frequently coach, whether legitimately dispersed the task or not. Considerable financial investments frequently match this poignant investment. Coaching, travel, equipments, facilities, etc. augment the price tag for sport involvement and parents raised up the tab. While we distinguish the prospective influence of parental involvement, we know little concerning how young athletes distinguish parental investment and support (White, S. A., & Duda, J. L. 1994). Nor do we recognize the prospective influence of parents on the psychosomatic variables of motivation and anxiety. Newsham & Murphey (1999) asserted that "the main purpose of sport is to create an opportunity for fun and growth. All the triumphs and heartaches that are inherent in sport can provide learning experiences and lessons that help pave the road to adulthood." http://www.coloradoperformance.org/psych.htm Though, when we talk about Parental roles in female elite gymnasts' there is a different point of view of US and UK socialists. Basically, there are two dilemmas for girls and parents of elite gymnasts. Opportunities are not enthusiastically available, and parents, particularly fathers, do not keenly support their daughters to join in athletics. This is not, inevitably, a conscious omission, but one that is a product of society. Daughters do not have the similar openings in youth leagues their fathers had. Miller Lite and the Women's Sports Foundation (1985) carried out a poll and in which questions asked was, "In your opinion, which of the following are the biggest barriers to increased participation by women in sports and fitness" The random sample of more than seven thousand respondents claimed, as their number one answer, "Lack of involvement and training as children. This poll showed that more than thirty percent of the respondents did not participate on pre high school athletic teams. "The Wilson Report: Moms, Dads, Daughters and Sports" (1988) confirmed the Miller Lite findings. In a random telephone survey of more than thousand mothers and fathers, and 513 of their seven to eighteen-year-old daughters, only 35 percent of daughters seven to ten years of age and 28 percent of daughters eleven to fourteen years of age became associated in athletics through community organizations; 24 percent of seven to ten year olds and 18 percent of eleven to fourteen-year-olds become concerned through private organizations; and just 6 percent of seven to ten-year-olds and 11 percent of eleven to fourteen-year-olds participated through their church organization. Though, other resources show an increase statistics; yet, it is still inadequate. According to the 1993 "Miller Lite Report on Sports and Fitness in the Lives of Working Women," prior to the passage of Title IX in 1972, only fifty percent of all girls take part in sports; above sixty percent took part after the passage of the law. It is also found that participation in organized youth sport programs is an accepted part of childhood development in the United States to greater extent in comparison with Britain (Coakley, 1998) and has the potential to have an enormous influence on the self-concept of children (Smith & Smoll, 1990). Coaches' parched parents mostly influence whether the female sport experience is optimistic (Sabo, D. 1988). Over the past thirty years several findings have been reported concerning adolescent athletes motives to participate or end involvement in youth sports. (Harris, D.V. 1979, Gill, D.L., Gross, J. B., & Huddleston, S. 1983, George, J.J. 1989, Scanlan, T. K., & Lewthwaite, R. 1988, Brodkin, P., & Weiss, M. R. 1990, Brustad, R. J. 1996a, Brustad, R.J. 1996b) Ebbeck and Becker (1994) found that perceived parent goal orientations were a primary predictor of motivational goal orientations in youth soccer players. Specifically, higher scores on professed parental task and ego orientation were connected with higher scores on player ego orientation. Further, higher scores on alleged parental task orientation and lower scores on a perceived performance climate were linked with a higher level of task orientation. These studies support Eccles' assimilation of socialization influences, mainly parental behaviors, into the study of children's motivation. Many studies show that parents support do influence the proficiency of elite performers. Bloom (1985) carried out study in which interviews were carried out from elite gymnasts and their parents of different areas of athletics and formed a model of talent development with three stages: that is early years, the middle years, and the later years. Changing demands on the child and parents characterizes these stages. In the early year's parent's role were established as a leader role where they presented their child with the preliminary opportunity to take part in the particular field and sought out their child's first formal teacher. Parents are also found to give confidence and support their child's learning and were often concerned directly in practices and learn. For the child as an athlete, the stress in these years was on having enjoyment and gets pleasure from learning the basics skills. A greater dedication of both parents and the gymnasts distinguished the changeover to the middle years to the athletic field. Throughout the later years, parental participation lessened as the performer took greater control of the administrative process about their prospect career. However, parents continued to give support, they not only backup their child financially but also emotionally. After the study provided by Bloom (1985), Ct (1999) continued study of developing a sport-through a specific model of talent expansion. Ct's work has taken sampling years ages six to twelve as talent development in sport, specializing years' thirteen to fifteen, and investment years above age sixteen, his samples consist of families of elite Canadian rowers and tennis players. Parental roles changed with the contradictory demands of every stage that is similar to Bloom's model. Throughout the sample years parents gave their children with the prospect to sample a wide diversity of sports. Cte distinguished that as parents' optimistic participation in sport, the choice of sport was not significant. Basically, parents lead their child in initial years of sports involvement. The specializing years saw parents in a facilitative role where they completed financial and time binders to their child's sport, sustaining admittance to better coaches, equipment, and training amenities. Lastly, parents as an advisor and supporter play role in the athletes' commitment to a higher level of training and struggle in the investment years. Parents retained a high interest in their child's sport and were fundamental in giving emotional support to help their child overcome hinders, such as injuries, stress and weakness and monetary support for training. This high level of arousing support throughout stressful times is a fundamental feature of the investment years. Thus both Bloom and Cte reveal that parents support assists expert performers and elite athletes contract with the demands of the persistent intentional practice essential to reach an expert level of performance. Both researchers' models reveal the developing role of parents from as a supporter and leader (Cte, J. 2002). Elite gymnasts incapable to reach certain emotional and financial resources face a qualitatively diverse road to gather the high levels of practice essential for elite performance. Donna Lopiano, the executive director of the Women's Sports Foundation, recognizes the complexities faced by parents and daughters in youth league situations. "The youth sports situation is much more complicated because youth sports has traditionally been a community volunteer function at the lowest levels," Lopiano explained. "It has been rotary clubs, it has been parks and recreation commissions, all those parents have to run the show for youth sports. What has happened is that as parks and recreation program funds have dried up, kids who are not looking at sport as an alternative is choosing negative alternatives. We must realize the stakes about what we are going to pay for in crimes and teenage pregnancies. There needs to be a national movement really to bring public attention to the importance of after-school activities for kids during this high risk period." The accountability for these programs and for the development of daughters' athletic skills falls directly on the shoulders of parents. According to the Wilson report, It perhaps hasn't been a very manly thing, according to the society, for a father to come home from work and asks his daughter if she likes to throw the ball around after supper. It is more proper, most presume, to play with the doll house that most dads will not take part in, either or read a story. Nevertheless, as evidence supports the controversy that attitudes have changed in this regard, behavior has not pursued the same course. The Wilson report showed that more than eighty percent of today's moms and dads usually acknowledge the idea that sports are evenly significant for boys and girls. Parents also illustrate very little apprehension that sports might be un-lady like, and nearly all agree that sports and fitness activities offer significant benefits to girls who participate. Parents' own behavior as well influences their daughters, since parents who play lean to have daughters who play seventy percent of the daughters who currently participate have parents who also engage in sports and fitness activities. Scanlan and colleagues have underlined that social evaluation, the information about one's capability that is received from other people, is significant in creating competitive stress. Significant others, such as parents and coaches, are individuals who could potentially promote competitive stress through social evaluation, and ultimately add to the professed costs experienced by the female athlete. Participation in this evaluative setting can be potentially ominous to an athlete (Scanlan, T.K. 1984 , Scanlan, T.K. 1986, Scanlan, T.K. & Passer, M. 1979, Scanlan, T.K., Ravizza, K., & Stein, G.L. 1989).. Fundamental to ideas of attainment and enthusiasm are the prospective pressures linked with a competitive environment. Within Expectancy-Value models, these pressures pessimistically affect the subjective task value by escalating the costs of participation. Pressures in viable environments lead to competitive stress and therefore are outstanding in many aspects of sport. A key to understanding stress in sport is based in descriptions of competition. Research over the past thirty years has focused on the significance of social assessment in competitive anxiety. Social assessment, whether through parents, peers, or coaches has the prospective to increase anxiety. So, social evaluation and assessment additionally influence the development of competitive stress (Ewing, M.E., & Seefeldt, V. 1996). Above any other advantage, parents value a daughter's sports experience as it contributes to her physical comfort; while asked how girls benefit from sports, more than fifty percent of parents revealed physical and health factors (Barber, H., Sukhi, H., & White, S. A. 1999). Sports and fitness activities also build self-reliance and self-esteem; they encourage teamwork, promote teamwork, and encourage friendships. Additionally, more than thirty percent of the parents of the girls who presently take part in sports and fitness activities wish their daughters were more involved in athletics, and above sixty percent of parents of daughters who quit playing wish they had continued. The statistic that having been said then is the most astonishing (McCullagh, P., Matzkanin, K. T., Shaw, S. D., & Maldonado. M. 1993). Of all the seven to ten-year-olds reviewed, simply above twenty five percent of those girls say their father is the one whom most supports they to play sport, twenty-seven percent. Particularly thinking the significance of this encouragement to little girls, with 44 percent of all daughters surveyed giving emphasis to that their parents' participation in their sports activities is the support they remember the most. It is time for fathers to step up to the plate or the free heave line and do an imperative play. "Right now, the [youth] fathers who are angry are policing situations," according to Lopiano. "You are the first generation of fathers who have come through the sixties and seventies and grown up believing that your daughters will have equal opportunity. You will really be teed off to find out that she does not. Especially if she happens to like soccer, or other sports that are not sponsored. You will really be teed off to find out that just because someone else has two sons and you have two daughters, the sons' teams are sponsored. . . . I think the big difference has been DADS who are bringing pressure to bear." However, Fathers and mothers can get assistance from a variety of sources. Thus the overall analysis of the literature demonstrates that female athletes have diverse mechanisms by which they develop their achievement related choices. Eccles' Expectancy-Value Model (Eccles & Harold, 1991; Eccles et al., 1998; Fredricks & Eccles, 2004) provides insight into the influence of considerable others and the consequent effect on attainment behavior. A vital component in the development of attainment behavior is the influence of significant socializers. As social influence from parents is a key contributor to the improvement of expectations for success and optimistic task value and successive achievement-related choices and performance of female athletes (Medwechuk, N., & Crossman, J. 1994). However, there are different views on the issue that we discussed. Competitive state anxieties, goal orientations, prospect for success, and the significance of success are all integrated in relation to perceptions of parents' goal orientations, discernment of parents' expectations for success, and the sensitivity important parents place on success. References: Barber, H., Sukhi, H., & White, S. A. (1999). The influence of parent-coaches on participant motivation and competitive anxiety in youth sport participants. Journal of Sport Behavior, 22, 162-180. Brustad, R. J. (1996a). Attraction to physical activity in urban schoolchildren: Parental socialization and gender influences. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67, 316-323. Brustad, R.J. (1996b). Parental and peer influence on children's psychological development through sport. In F.L. Smoll & R.E. Smith (Eds.), Children and youth in sport: A biopsychosocial perspective. (pp. 112-124). Dubuque, IA: Brown & Benchmark. Coakley, J.J. (1998). Sport in society: Issues and controversies. (6th Ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill. Diagnostic Research, Inc., "The Wilson Report: Moms, Dads, Daughters and Sports," ( Wilson Sporting Goods, Co. River Grove, IL, 7 June 1988), 29. Donna Lopiano, "Stop the Rhetoric: Daughters Deserve What the Law Requires," USA Today, 2 July 1993, 12C. Ebbeck, V. & Becker, S. (1994). Psychosocial predictors of goal orientations in youth soccer. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 65, 355-362. Ewing, M.E., & Seefeldt, V. (1996). Patterns and attrition in American agency-sponsored youth sports. In F.L. Smoll & R.E. Smith (Eds.), Children and youth in sport: A biopsychosocial perspective. (pp. 31-44). Dubuque, IA: Brown & Benchmark. George, J.J. (1989). Finding solutions to the problem of fewer female coaches. The Physical Educator, 46, 2-8. Gill, D.L., Gross, J. B., & Huddleston, S. (1983) Participation motivation in youth sports. International Journal of Sport Psychology 14, 1-14. Gould, D., Feltz, D., & Weiss, M. R. (1985). Reasons for attrition in competitive youth swimming. International Journal of Sport Psychology 16, 126-140. Harris, D.V. (1979). Female sport today: psychological considerations. International Journal of Sport Psychology 10, 168-172. McCullagh, P., Matzkanin, K. T., Shaw, S. D., & Maldonado. M. (1993). Motivation for participation in physical activity: A comparison of parent-child perceived competencies and participation motives. Pediatric Exercise Science, 5, 224-233. Medwechuk, N., & Crossman, J. (1994). Effects of gender bias on the evaluation of male and female swim coaches. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78, 163-169. New World Decisions. Miller Lite Report on Women in Sports. Miller Brewing Company, Milwaukee, WI, December 1985, 3-4, 6-7, 9, 12. Sabo, D. (1988). Sport patriarchy and male identity: New questions about men and sport. ARENA-Review, 12, 1-29. Scanlan, T. K., & Lewthwaite, R. (1988). From stress to enjoyment: Parental and coach influences on young participants. In E. W. Brown & C. F. Branta (Eds.), Competitive sports for children and youth: An overview of the research and issues (pp. 41-48). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Scanlan, T.K. & Passer, M. (1979). Sources of competitive stress in young female athletes. Journal of Sport Psychology, 1, 151-159. Scanlan, T.K. (1984). Competitive stress in children. In M.R. Weiss and D. Gould (Eds.), Sport for Children and Youth, (pp. 113-118). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Scanlan, T.K. (1986). Social evaluation and the competition process: A developmental perspective. In EL. Smoll, R.A. Magill, M.J. Ash (Eds.), Children in Sport (3rd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Scanlan, T.K., Ravizza, K., & Stein, G.L. (1989). An in-depth study of former elite figure skaters: Introduction to the project. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11, 54-64. Brodkin, P., & Weiss, M. R. (1990). Developmental differences in motivation for participating in competitive swimming. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 12, 248-263. Smith, R. E., & Smoll, F. L., (1990). Self-esteem and children's reaction to youth sport coaching behaviors: A field study of self-enhancement processes. Developmental Psychology, 26, 987-993. White, S. A., & Duda, J. L. (1994). The relationship of gender, level of sport involvement, and participation motivation to task and ego orientation. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 25, 4-18. Women's Sports Foundation, "Miller Lite Report on Sports and Fitness in the Lives of Working Women," ( Miller Brewing Company, Milwaukee, WI, 8 March 1993), 4. Women's Sports Foundation, "Miller Lite Report on Sports and Fitness in the Lives of Working Women," ( Miller Brewing Company, Milwaukee, WI, 8 March 1993), 5. Bloom, B. S. (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballantine. Ct, J. (1999). The influence of the family in the development of talent in sports. The Sports Psychologist, 13, 395-417. Ct, J. (2002). Coach and peer influence on children's development through sport. In J. M. Silva & D. Stevens (Eds.), Psychological foundations of sport (2ndEdition) (pp. 520-540). Boston, MA: Merrill Sherry Newsham, Ph.D., and Milledge Murphey, Ph.D. 'SPORT PSYCHOLOGY GUIDELINES for PARENTS of YOUNG ATHLETES' available at http://www.coloradoperformance.org/psych.htm Fredericks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2004). Parental influences on youth involvement in sports. In M. R. Weiss (Ed.),Developmental sport and exercise psychology: A lifespan perspective (pp. 144-164). Morgantown, WV: FitnessInformation Technology Eccles, J. S., & Harold, R. D. (1991). Gender differences in sport involvement: Applying the Eccles expectancy-value model.Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 3, 7-35. Eccles J.S., Wigfield, A., Schiefele, U., (1998). Motivation to succeed. In Damon W. (Series Ed.) Eisenberg N. (Vol. Ed.),Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3 Social, emotional and personality development (5th ed., pp. 1017-1094). New York:Wiley. Read More