We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

Real and Intellectual Property Law Briefs - Case Study Example

Comments (0)
The Plaintiff i.e.John Moore had leukemia and for its treatment he visited UCLA Medical Center in the year 1976. The Doctors that were treating Moore confirmed after diagnosis that Moore had leukemia. In addition to this fact the defendants in this case were aware of the fact that the some of the blood products that were to be discarded from Moore's body had commercial value…
Download full paper

Extract of sample
Real and Intellectual Property Law Briefs

Download file to see previous pages... Golde made many post operative trips to the medical center for regular check ups. In addition to the normal check ups the doctors at the medical centre conducted research on the cells extracted from Moore's body and hoped to benefit commercially from the results of their research. However, this fact about research was not disclosed to Moore by the Doctors. From the research conducted on Moore's cells, a cell line was developed and got patented by Dr. Golde. Later Golde entered into agreement with the Genetic Institute and was the main beneficiary of the commercial exploits. Moore later sued Dr. Golde and other defendants over the issue.
Although the Court discarded Moore's basic claim and ruled that he had no property rights as such or over any money made later on by the defendants by the research conducted and later exploitingg it commercially. It however, said that the defendants were obliged to disclose to Moore the financial angle involved in the cells extracted from Moore's body, so in these circumstances although Moore who had no property rights was free to bring a claim of injuries against the defendants. The decision was given by a bench of Supreme Court of California. Various arguments were forwarded by the counsel for the Plaintiff. The Hon'ble Supreme Court examined them in deatail and reached to a conclusion that the person has no absolute right to the products of his body because they are not unique and further espoused that legislature has formulated laws that stated that forbid patients under some treatment to possess their extracted organs. In this case the plaintiff's spleen was taken out to protect his life from a life threatening situation but the court ruled out that the patient has an right over the spleen after it has been extracted from his body to save his life and under normal circumstances affected organs or body parts have to be disposed or may be used for research for the advancement of the medical profession. The Court feared that by extending property rights to body parts could spell a doom for the medical profession in general as it is a norm that the affected cells or body parts taken out from patient's body are used for research purposes. Moreover, Moore had given his consent too for the procedure. Although, to some extent it can be said that the consent was not informed as the whole procedure may not have been explained to him verbatim and there were some commercial interests involved. But to that he can only sue his Doctor i.e. Mr. Golde but the other defendants have no liability towards him.
Main Issue :
The highlight of this judgment was not to extend the status of property to ill human organs as that would have leaded to a plethora of damage suits and loss to the advancement of medical profession.
A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc.

Brief Facts :
It can be said that this intellectual property law case an landmark case in which the United Court of Appeals decided that ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
Property law
Under this provision of the law, an individual who has possessed the property of another for a reasonable period of time can be rewarded with the ownership of such property, subject to the fulfillment of certain conditions. Therefore, the failure of a landowner to defend his ownership of the property for a certain period of time would see him dispossessed of the ownership of the land.
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study
Property law
Defaulting of Loan and foreclosure of Property After notifying his son that he had an inheritance in the piece of property, Andy’s son had some legal rights to use the piece of land for any property owning benefits that would bring value. But it is worth emphasizing that in joint tenancy with right of survivorship, after the death of Andy, who was a partner, the ownership of the property revised to the existing owners alive and not to the heir as spelt out in the will.
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study
Property law
Sole Proprietorship It is not entirely correct that sole proprietorship is such a bad idea for Betty, especially since it is easy to start and will allow Betty to maintain full control over the business, which is ideal for a business that wants to retain a Christian foundation.
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study
Property law
The process of starting a business may needs the exploration of different possible options with the aim of coming up with a better option that suites the business idea. The business options According to studies, franchising gives a businessperson the advantage of starting a business by relying on already existing business model.
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study
Property law
Below I offer my thoughts on the handling of the situation, both legally and spiritually. Joint Tenancy with Right of Survivorship I agree with the advice that Barney should take the case to court and fight Opie legally. Joint tenancy, in estate law, refers to a form of ownership where more than one person has ownership of one property or properties.
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study
Intellectual Property & Technology Transfer
Not only this, but it would effect the repute of the well known company. Viewing the circumstances the well known company applied to refute the new application. The application for new brand was given in 29 November 2006 by Hffner GmbH to register the trade mark 'EXIMED' in 5 Class.
6 Pages(1500 words)Case Study
Intellectual Property and Copyright
His biggest problem has always been that he never felt he could be a front man and then one day realises that the answer to all his problems has been sharing a bedroom in his parent's council flat in Islington his whole life - his good looking rather wild younger brother Joe.
14 Pages(3500 words)Case Study
Property Law
Ms Oxley and Mr Hiscock cohabited a property that was owned by Ms Oxley purchased by her under right to buy legislation. This property was financed entirely by Mr Hiscock but was later sold and the sale proceeds were used to purchase another property in which Mr Hiscock and Ms Oxley lived1.
7 Pages(1750 words)Case Study
Intellectual Property
2. Identify any legal violations involved in this case? (DMCA, fraud, HIPPA, 1st Amendment, etc)2. Identify any legal violations involved in this case? (DMCA, fraud, HIPPA, 1st Amendment, etc)Legal violations involved in this case is 1st Amendment which emphasizes need to adhere to intellectual property rights in an effort to promote creativity and overall socio-economic growth in the country.
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study
Intellectual property in music industry
Other than the clip art and title, there are no unusual design aspects to the pages, and no text other than the recipe text. The recipes are arranged according to how long they take to prepare, with the shorter recipes first.
8 Pages(2000 words)Case Study
Let us find you another Case Study on topic Real and Intellectual Property Law Briefs for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us