Federalists and Jeffersonians - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
When George Washington rose to presidency, the brilliant and aggressive personalities of Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton unsurprisingly clashed. The two notable statesmen disagreed over the proper course of action to implement in both domestic and foreign arena, thus, political division appeared within the cabinet (Wright).
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER99% of users find it useful
Federalists and Jeffersonians
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Federalists and Jeffersonians"

Federalists and Jeffersonians When George Washington rose to presidency, the brilliant and aggressive personalities of Thomas Jeffersonand Alexander Hamilton unsurprisingly clashed. The two notable statesmen disagreed over the proper course of action to implement in both domestic and foreign arena, thus, political division appeared within the cabinet (Wright).
On the one hand, the Federalists headed by Hamilton were concerned with enhancing material resources required for attaining prosperity and advancing the influence of government internally and diplomatically. These were done by proposing economic policies that would enable the nation to be self-sufficient (Wright). The Federalists were deemed conservatives and focused on industry building and addressing the needs of rich merchants and landowners. The party also tended to favour Great Britain in foreign affairs ("Columbia Encyclopedia").
On the other hand, the Jeffersonians, which later became known as the Democratic party, led by Jefferson were more concerned with the ideal of an agrarian society of yeoman farmers and adamant to expand the powers of the federal government. The party also sympathized with the French. (Wright)
Hamilton's proposals including the funding of revolutionary war debt, federal assumption of the obligation of the states, creation of a national bank and federal encouragement of native manufactures were intended to emulate Great Britain's economic model. But then, such proposals leaned towards wealthy men and substantially indebted regions over others. Jefferson along with James Madison viewed these as contrary to republican morality, which promoted harmony among the different regions and closing the income gap between the rich and poor ("Encyclopedia of American History").
As each political leader attracted supporters, the national-level disagreements trickled down onto local issues. With the magnitude of political passion during the period, such issues provided the nucleus of political parties (Wright).
In 1791, Jefferson, Madison and their allies in the Congress reached out for links with local politicians. They established the National Gazette and wrote under pseudonyms lucid condemnation of the perils they viewed and urged the people to support the Republican interest in the fall congressional elections. ("Encyclopedia of American History")
Under the leadership of John Adams, Washington's second administration, Federalist domestic policies were put to the test and proven effective, sound macroeconomic principles prevailed and governmental structure was expanded on top of the development of efficient administrative system. However, trouble with France was brewing and eventually led to a virtual warfare in 1798. ("Columbia Encyclopedia")
In response to the hostile actions of the French revolution, the Congress that was Federalist-controlled passed the Alien and Sedition Acts. However, the objective of such law was actually to destroy the Jeffersonians. Meanwhile, Jefferson was winning popular support among Southern landowners, the mechanics, workers, and the masses in general. His party was also much better with publicity than the Federalist. On the other hand, division in the Federalist party between the followers of Adams and Hamilton was seen. ("Columbia Encyclopedia")
The continuation of the program of Jeffersonian repression as well as war time taxes even after Adams moved toward peace with France substantially contributed to the Republican triumph in the 1800 elections.

Works Cited
"Federalist Party". The Columbia Encyclopedia, 6th Ed. 2006.
"Republicans, Jeffersonians". Encyclopedia of American History. Answers Corporation. 2006. 17 March 2007.
Wright, Robert K. Soldier-Statemen of the Constitution. Washington DC. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Federalists and Jeffersonians Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Federalists and Jeffersonians Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words. Retrieved from
(Federalists and Jeffersonians Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
Federalists and Jeffersonians Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words.
“Federalists and Jeffersonians Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Federalists and Jeffersonians

Hamilton Federalists 16

... HAMILTON FEDERALISTS 16 The federalists’ wrote a total of 85 articles that promoted the approval of the U.S constitution.The 85 essays were written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay with Alexander writing 51 essays, Madison 26 and jays writing 5 articles, the rest were a partnership between Madison and Hamilton. The Hamilton 16 was a 2nd part in the essays that argue that the federal laws should apply to the people and not just the states. Hamilton addresses the need for the federal government to legislate directly over the people of the United States. I agree with Hamilton on the Government having control on the activities of the people. By so doing the government not only controls what states do but also... that can avoid...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

The Federalists Republic

...American Passages by Edward Ayers, Lewis Gould, David Oshinsky and Jean Soderlund Chapter 7: “The Federalists Republic, 1789-1799” Report Opposing Visions of America George Washington’s victory to presidency came after creation of the new constitution. Many Federalists disagreed with specific parts of the constitution and made arrangements to replace the Confederation. Conflicts that arose over policies, the varying interpretation of the constitution, and the competition that was present for power which led to the development of political parties. Political diversions emerged during Washington’s first administration, one of the sides choosing to favor commerce while the other agriculture. The two...
5 Pages(1250 words)Book Report/Review

Federalists v. AntiFederalists

...Full Full A Critique of the Federalists and Anti-Federalists Positions on the American Constitution with Emphasis on the Bill of Rights The ratification of the current United States Constitution went through a long process of nationwide consultative processes that was also wrought with huge controversies from individuals and groups with special interests in business, agriculture or political inclinations regarding the implications of the constitution to the afore stated interests. The view held and maintained by each of these groups was based on their perceived projection as to what lay in stock for them once the constitution either came into force or did not. These interest or pressure groups if so to...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Federalists Paper

...FEDERALIST PAPER by Alexander Hamilton Book Critique "The Federalists Paper as the most important interpretation of the United s Constitution". The most important interpretation of the United States Constitution is the compilation of 85 Federalist Papers who's one of the three founding authors and acted as the major and primary contributor is Alexander Hamilton, a statesman and a leader in working the United States Constitutional Convention which is written and published in the year 1787 and 1788 respectively. Fifty one writings belong to the intelligent idea and workmanship of Hamilton. He is also a political analyst, lawyer, officer of an Army, a politician during his time, and...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Fallacies of the Anti-Federalists

...JUSTIN, BELOW ARE MY COMMENTS Fallacies of the Anti-Federalists In our own time, it is hard to imagine what it must have been like to craft the structure of the American government. A mostly rural culture, with only the faintest signs of political order, the early nation teetered on the brink of disunion. The British Empire had left a sour taste in the mouths of many Americans, who had sacrificed so much to come to a place where opportunities for freedom existed, in a variety of ways, from religious to political to economic. Too many of the former British colonists, any centralized government represented the possibility of unchecked despotism, and it was this objection that galvanized the anti-Federalist resistance. The memory... of the...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Federalists and Republicans

...The Federalists Vs. The Republicans No debate in American history has been as lasting or has sparked more controversy than the issue of Federalism. In the conflict between Republicanism and Federalism there was the similarity that each believed in a central federal government. However, the Republicans believed more power should reside in the states and that they should exercise control over many of government's functions. The Federalists believed that most of the authority should reside in the central federal government. This laid the foundation for the debates between the elite insiders versus the common man, and the seat of the ultimate rule of law. These views are expressed in many of the Acts,...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Federalists and the AntiFederalists

...Federalist and Anti-Federalist After the end of the revolutionary war, the Americans were free from British control, so they wanted to build their own governmental system, where the central government had no control over the states. This gave the states complete power which led to them not respecting other countries. This led to a lot of thinking and it was believed that a document had to be made, which led to the creation of the Constitution. The making of the American Constitution involved hours of debate and negotiation. Yet some delegates were not happy with the outcome of the constitution after its completion. The final Constitution had to be approved and ratified or approved by the each state. The...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Debate between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists

...Though the delegates at Philadelphia produced the Constitution, ratification was far from assured. While many saw the need for an organized, democratic national government, many people that remembered British tyranny were against the formation of such an institution. This led to the division into two separate groups in support of and opposed to the Constitution, known as the Federalists and Anti-Federalists, respectively. While each side had strong arguments to support their positions, the Anti-Federalists proved the most idealistic and democratic, though the leadership of the Federalists would prove too effective to overcome. The formation of the...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Describe the political warfare between the federalist and their opponents,the Jeffersonians ,during the 1790s,

...Introduction In the world history, the first grass-roots political parties emerged during the era of PresidentGeorge Washington in 1790s. Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson were the founders of the first political parties, the Federalists and the Jeffersonian Republicans respectively. Washington refused to consider himself a member of any party, although in retrospect, historians usually regard him as a Federalist because of his greater propensity to side with Hamilton than with Jefferson (Wright, para10). Alexander Hamilton started building a nationwide coalition by 1790. His objective was to rally national support for Hamiltons economic programs and creation of a strong national...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Federalists and Republicans

... Federalists and Republicans Introduction Originally, there existed only one party in America which was called the Federalists. This party was the only governing body in America. In 1793, another party emerged. The Republicans were also known as the Democratic-Republican Party. This party was formed as a result of Thomas Jefferson's resignation from the cabinet (Murrin and et al 56). His resignation was due to his opposition to the federalists’ policies which he insisted were based on corruption and oppression of the poor. The two parties had huge differences as far as domestic and foreign policies were concerned. The Federalists aimed at enriching the wealthy class in the community whereas... , The...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Federalists and Jeffersonians for FREE!

Contact Us