Summary to essay on topic "The Hegemony Debate in International Relations"
The distribution of power in the world, whether it may be politically, economically and technologically, has been the interest of many scholars whose debate has led to a wealth of ideas and prominent school of thoughts. A very healthy field is the study of dominance of certain nations which involves an analysis of the past, present and the future…
Download file "The Hegemony Debate in International Relations" to see previous pages...
In technical terms, a "polar actor" (or a "pole") is a state or a coalition of states that is so significant that its removal (or its entrance) would alter the contours of the interstate system. In more prosaic parlance, a polar actor is a Great Power.
"Polarity" concerns the way in which the major capabilities of power are distributed among the main actors of the interstate system. Let us write or edit the essay on your topic "The Hegemony Debate in International Relations" with a personal 20% discount.. Try it now In a multipolar system, the main capabilities are distributed among several Great Powers. In a bipolar system, the capabilities are distributed between two preeminent Powers - as was the case during the height of the Cold War. In a unipolar system, one single state has managed to concentrate an inordinately large share of the system's capabilities under its own control and thus enabled itself to exercise an unchallenged pre-eminence on the international scene. (Nye, 1990)
With such an immense concentration of capabilities on American hands, it is clear that the contemporary interstate system is unipolar in nature. The USA stands head and shoulders above all other states in terms of power capabilities both military and economically but is it necessarily hegemonic
The hegemony cycle is based on t...
This preeminent position is called hegemony.
Hegemony seems to have acquired two connotations, positive and negative. In the positive image, "benign hegemony," the leading country takes on the burden of maintaining international order and pays a disproportionate price for doing so. In this approach, international order is seen as a "public good" benefiting all countries, supported by the hegemonic power. Kindleberger (1973:28) argues that "the international economic and monetary system needs leadership, a country which is prepared , consciously or unconsciously, under some system of rules that it has internalized, to set standards of conduct for other countries ; and to seek to get others to follow them , to take on an undue share of the burdens of the system ." Britain had this role from 1815 to 1913, and the United States after 1945, according to Kindleberger, but in the interwar years Britain was unable, and the United States was unwilling, to accept this leadership role ; Kindleberger sees in this lack of leadership the main causes for the severity of the depression of the 1930s . "Hegemonic stability theory" (see Keohane 1980), to quote McKeown's (1983: 73) summary, argues that "it is the power of hegemonic states that leads to the emergence of open international economic systems" with free trade, benefiting all.
According to Puchala (2005, p. 572), the term hegemony refers to the predominance of one state over others which can mean primacy in importance, authority or force. Hegemony is the result of a single state attaining such power as to enable him or give him the right to manage the international system. This state find themselves responsible to manage
...Download file "The Hegemony Debate in International Relations" to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document "The Hegemony Debate in International Relations"
(“The Hegemony Debate in International Relations Essay”, n.d.)
The Hegemony Debate in International Relations Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1511518-the-hegemony-debate-in-international-relations
(The Hegemony Debate in International Relations Essay)
The Hegemony Debate in International Relations Essay. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1511518-the-hegemony-debate-in-international-relations.
“The Hegemony Debate in International Relations Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1511518-the-hegemony-debate-in-international-relations.
Cited: 0 times
CHECK THESE SAMPLES - THEY ALSO FIT YOUR TOPIC "The Hegemony Debate in International Relations"
This paper attempts to answer the question whether liberalism is simply another tool to maintain western hegemony. Liberalism is one of the most dominant theories in international politics and emphasizes on equality and freedom and most importantly the rights inherent in individuals as human beings such as right to life, liberty, and property.
The basic argument will centre on differences and points of convergence both in broader philosophical assumptions of the two theories and the specific ideas on the structure of the IR. It will be argued that, while orthodox Marxism and neo-Gramscianism share a set of basic assumptions, the discursive character of these ideas is different enough to warrant the conclusion that Marxist and neo-Gramscian views of the IR present different views of the nature of modern IR.
The paper attempts to align with the idea of hegemonic control by the United States, which leads to generalized stability in the international market. It does the research of historic events to show the effects of cooperation or hegemony applied to the international trade.
To better appreciate the international approaches taken by countries in the third and second worlds, the author analyzes the various international relations theories that exist. In the constructivist’s view, the world is basically a ‘social construct’, which is supported by an in-depth comprehension of international structure.
International business or cross cultural business has been increased a lot in recent past because of globalization. Outsourcing and offshoring of business, workforce exchange, and diversity at workplaces are other important contributions of globalization.
The author laid out a group of certain principles that he believed outlined the ideas of Realism. He argued that power was the main currency between nations. Political actions of states were therefore governed by this need to acquire power. The important distinction he made from earlier ideas was that morality was irrelevant.
Historically speaking, the international system initially coincided with the powerful Roman and Greek city states, later with the feudal organised state which therefore became the core of the nation state. This evolution is the result of the development of the historical environment, fact that transformed the state, becoming the main component of the international scene.
That is, the dominant culture through its methods, values, assumptions, strong points, etc, etc… will infuse, involve, manage and control key aspects of another group of people and their culture. In fact, Gramsci states that the dominant culture will condition as well as shape the lives and the thinking of most people in the other culture.
etween the states and groups of states are conditioned by the existing global economic structures and how the relations of dependency within these structures influence the international politics. (Wallerstein, 1979: 117) Later in 1980s and 1990s Robert Cox or Fred Gale developed
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"The Hegemony Debate in International Relations"
with a personal 20% discount.