We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

Business Law in Australia (Tort) - Case Study Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary to case study on topic "Business Law in Australia (Tort)"
The case of Donoghue v Stevenson1 established the principle of the duty of care. The House of Lords acknowledged a new relationship of a duty of care between the manufacturers and the customers who utilise the products. This ruling however is considered to be narrow in its scope…
Download full paper
Polish This Essay
Business Law in Australia (Tort)
Read TextPreview

Extract of case study "Business Law in Australia (Tort)"

Download file "Business Law in Australia (Tort)" to see previous pages... Since such affected people are described as neighbours, the doctrine of duty is usually described as the neighbour principle. For the purpose of this doctrine a person's neighbours are individuals who are directly and proximately affected by act of commission or omission of that person.
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic "Business Law in Australia (Tort)" with a personal 20% discount.. Try it now
most of the developments have taken place in the rule of negligence. These developments have given another definition to the neighbour principle by Lord Wilberforce. In Anns v Merton London2, the House of Lords established a two - stage test. First, there should be an adequate Proximity or neighbourhood relationship in the reasonable observation of the defendant's negligence which would cause damage to the interests of the claimant. If this holds good then a prima facie duty of care becomes apparent. Second, it is essential to determine whether any issues exist, which hinder the applicability of the duty of care that is owed to persons, or that try to negate it wholly, or reduce its scope.
However the two - stage test faced much criticism in respect of its applicability which is broad in its scope. As such the current test of duty of care in the areas of proximity, foresight and fairness in establishing the former had been adopted by the courts. Under this test, claimants were required to establish three aspects which they consider to be a duty of care. First, there should be a violation that could have been reasonably foreseen and which was certain to cause injury to persons in the claimant's position. Second, there should be a reasonable and adequate proximity between the parties and third, it should be fair, justifiable and reasonable to impose the liability. This test's interpretation has been evidenced in the case of Caparo Industries v Dickman3. In this case the decision of the Court of Appeal was rescinded by the House of Lords.
If one accepts that the principle in Donoghue v. Stevenson4 to be precise, then by implication the decision of the House of Lords in the cases of Murphy5 is correct. In the Murphy case, the House of Lords did not grant compensation for the economic loss in relation to the damage caused to the building. It was considered to be unimportant, that this ruin was capable of harming other buildings and persons.
Moreover, it was held that an impeachment of actual damage would result if there was public justification of negligence based entirely on the decision in Donoghue v. Stevenson. Furthermore, it was opined on the basis of the principle established in Donoghue v. Stevenson, that the normative importance of information that a flaw was hazardous was irrelevant after such a defect was noticed6.
Lord Bridge opined in this context that if injury to a person or damage to a building was due to a latent flaw in the chattel, then the manufacturer was to be held liable for the damage caused. In addition, he stated that if the latent defect came to light prior to the occurrence of damage, then the principle established in the Donoghue v. Stevenson case would be inapplicable. Accordingly, the chattel, under consideration, would be deemed to be defective but not dangerous7.
In the context of real estate, a builder would be liable for constructing a building that had dangerous defects. The builder would be held liable in the event of such a defect remaining undisclosed until personal injury or damage to some other property transpired. 250. This latency requirement has been abandoned and accordingly, the principle of ...Download file "Business Law in Australia (Tort)" to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document "Business Law in Australia (Tort)"
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Business Law in Australia (Tort) Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Business Law in Australia (Tort) Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1504169-business-law-in-australia-tort
(Business Law in Australia (Tort) Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
Business Law in Australia (Tort) Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1504169-business-law-in-australia-tort.
“Business Law in Australia (Tort) Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1504169-business-law-in-australia-tort.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
Business and law
This is because the written law that provides for the application of the principles of common law and equity in these the countries does not expressly state that these principles are in force. 1It however provides that the High Court or the Supreme Court, and the Magistrates Courts exercise their jurisdiction in accordance with these principles, but subject to such modifications as local circumstances render necessary.
14 Pages(3500 words)Case Study
Business law
The respondents (growers) role was to rear chicken based in “Hunter Valley Region.” These chicks were supplied to them by the appellants (Steggles) whose processing plant was at Beresfield. When chicks had grown, they were picked and paid for by appellants.
14 Pages(3500 words)Case Study
Tort Law Essay
Essentially, where there has been a situation where an individual suffers a loss and is injured as a result of the negligence of another, they may be entitled to claim losses from the negligent individual or party. Broadly speaking, in order for there to be a valid claim in negligence, there must be a duty of care from the plaintiff to the claimant; secondly, there must have been a breach of this duty; and thirdly, a causal link both factually and legally must exist between the breach and the harm suffered by the individual.
10 Pages(2500 words)Case Study
Business Law,law of tort
The words 'the celebrity lawyer now finds himself in the frame' are in fact defamatory since when they are interpreted, they mean that the lawyer found himself in hot soup trouble. 1 The defamatory statement is written hence it qualifies as a libel. My first advice to Nick Freeman is to bring an action for libel which is adorable without the plaintiff having to prove special damage.
8 Pages(2000 words)Case Study
Tort Law
The author was a journalist who wrote a book entitled "Bent Coppers: The Inside Story of Scotland Yard's Battle Against Police Corruption" which was published by the publisher Orion Publishing Group Ltd. The author had been an officer in the Metropolitan police until his resignation upon a finding of an internal disciplinary panel.
10 Pages(2500 words)Case Study
Business Law-Tort
However, Kofsy should have discussed the problem with the boss of the company than just an employee for faster results. Also, the employee, Pat Seiple could have relayed the message as well to the boss so something could have been done. But this is not the case here.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
Business Law in Australia
This is because Bob and Sally, along with other customers, have not been informed of the sudden changes in the policy of the company according to which the offer to season's ticket has been revoked. Further, the advertisement did not provide or spoke of any deadlines or that the offer was subject to any sudden changes.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
The Law of Tort
For instance a claimant can sustain an action in trespass and not in negligence notwithstanding that he or she has not incurred damages.2 Bridgit Dimond explains that: Trespass to the Person is often founded on assault, battery and false imprisonment.
20 Pages(5000 words)Case Study
British Tort Law
In England and Wales, the law of tort covers five types of offenses: trespass of land, trespass against goods, trespass against person, negligence and defamation (Wikipedia). Trespass on land, goods and person is altogether the most common type of tort, but in all cases the main concern is the allocation of responsibility for whatever losses are sustained.
10 Pages(2500 words)Case Study
Contract Law Degree Case Study
Rupert has completed the work to the full satisfaction of Herbert and he has evidently accepted the fact too. But he paid Rupert only 25% less of the cost of the listed items as interim payments instead of 10% less. There arises a breach of contract on the part of Herbert since he did not pay as he had agreed to at the beginning of the contract.
4 Pages(1000 words)Case Study
Let us find you another Case Study on topic Business Law in Australia (Tort) for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us