We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

U.S. Supreme Court Tennessee vs. Garner - Case Study Example

Comments (0)
Various socio-legal institutions including the courts and the police are often expected to give expression to the collective conscience of the society. Though, it is a fact that the collective conscience is quiet a complex and multifaceted notion…
Download full paper

Extract of sample
U.S. Supreme Court Tennessee vs. Garner

Download file to see previous pages... The various arms and appendages of law while towing the practical manifestations of their powers do sometimes give way to special situations that alter and remold the conscience of a society and bring them under direct and enhanced observation and scrutiny of the masses and the intelligentsia. Infact such instances happen to be the important turning points in the legal and judicial history of any nation and do many a times lead to the evolution of the existing statutory provisions in the light of the current and emerging changes in the society. US Supreme Court case Tennessee vs. Garner is one such thought provoking event in the legal history of the US that strikingly challenged the existing statutory provisions pertaining to the use of force by the law enforcement agencies and called for reinterpretation and reshaping of this earlier taken for granted aspect of the policing in the US.

October 3, 1974 was one other usual day in the life of the Memphis Police Officers Leslie Wright and Eton Hymon, when they were ordered to respond to a "prowler inside call". Both the officers promptly arrived on the scene of crime and after receiving relevant feedback from the neighbors, proceeded to scan the house being targeted. Hymon noticed a person running across the backyard and with the aid of his flashlight, was reasonably able to discern that the suspect, Edward Garner was an unarmed teenager of slight built (Findlaw, 2008). When Garner tried to climb over a fence, Hymon shot him in the back of his head to prevent him from escaping from the scene of crime (Findlaw, 2008). Later on a paltry ten dollars and a ring stolen from the house being scanned was found on the body of the suspect.
Hymon acted in direct exercise of the authority given by a Tennessee statute to its police officers, sanctioning a deadly use of force so as to apprehend a fleeing suspect (Findlaw, 2008). The father of the deceased teenager filed a suit in the Federal District Court, to seek damages for the death and violation of his son's constitutional rights (Findlaw, 2008). The District Court upheld the constitutional credentials of the given statute and declared the officer's actions to be legal and valid (Findlaw, 2008). However, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, while responding to an appeal by the appellee-respondent, reversed, stating that the use of force against a fleeing suspect in pursuance of the requirements of the Fourth Amendment is subject to be qualified in the light of the criteria of reasonableness (Findlaw, 2008).
The basic issue that this case brings to fore is the ascertaining of the constitutionality of the deadly use of force by the law enforcement agencies against an unarmed, fleeing suspect (Findlaw, 2008). It questions the gross generalization of the provisions pertaining to the use of force by the law enforcement agencies against the relatively innocuous suspects who try to flee. Should the nature or proportion of force used by a police team against an escaping terrorist be same as that used against a harmless teenager, who attempts to escape from the scene of some petty crime This case highlights the human rights of the fleeing suspects and pragmatically checks the unrestrained use of force by t ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
Recent California or U.S. Supreme Court Case Brief
This was an important case with respect to intentional sex discrimination and never before had such principle of law been enunciated by the Judiciary. In the light of the selected case, teacher by the name of Roderick Jackson, teaching in the Birmingham, Alabama public school system, brought a suit against the Birmingham Board of Education alleging that the board retaliated against him because he complained about sex discrimination at Ensley High School.
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study
Exclusionary Rule by the Supreme Court
In other words, the Supreme Court through the Exclusionary rule aimed at excluding any type of evidence obtained through official lawlessness; the American derivation of the Exclusionary rule is considered unique as a result of its deterrence rationale, as well as a mandatory nature in which it applies.
4 Pages(1000 words)Case Study
Court Case Scenario
Next, he is willing to arrange replacement of the machine, but still insists that the fault is not on the part of the seller. He even advises Walt Winters that the fact that the defendant had installed inadequately tested machine, need not be publicly acknowledged.
5 Pages(1250 words)Case Study
Supreme Court Trilogy Decisions in 1960
Enterprise Wheel and Car Corp. (363 U.S. 593), and The United Steelworkers of America v. Warrior Gulf Co. (363 U.S. 574). Since these three cases involved the United Steelworkers of America, a duly recognized bargaining union at that time, these cases are collectively known as the"Steelworkers' Trilogy".
8 Pages(2000 words)Case Study
Supreme court cases
One of the cases is Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum which is expected to be tried during the month of October, in this case it will be decided whether the judges of America have the authority
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study
Court case
e for this level of unethical behavior can be traced to the fact that the judge was being bought out by prison industries that sought to continue a high level of profitability with respect to the overall inmate populations that they house. Due to the fact that prison populations
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study
Case Study 1 Understanding the Court System
The mandate of the court lies in solving constitutional cases which may have been referred from lower level courts (Us Courts, 2014). The sole responsibility of any court is the interpretation of the law. In the case of United States vs. Edith Schlain Windsor,
6 Pages(1500 words)Case Study
The Tennessee v. Garner Case

The author states that the district court upheld the Tennessee statute, and confirmed as valid the actions of the officer to have used reasonable force to effect an arrest. However, the higher court reversed that decision and questioned the authenticity of lethal force, if it left the suspect without life.

1 Pages(250 words)Assignment
The Supreme Court has held that the selection guidelines in the federal governments Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures also apply to performance measurement
A good example is the McGrory V. Applied Signal Technology case that the Supreme Court handled in 2013 (Lewis, 2013). In this case, a Mr. McGrory gave a verbal warning for poor work performance to Dana Thomas, an employee serving
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study
Teva and Sandoz court case
The case at the Supreme Court involved the question of whether the US Court of Appeals for Federal Circuit should review a fresh the defense provided at the district Court judgment for ‘clear error’. According to
4 Pages(1000 words)Case Study
Let us find you another Case Study on topic U.S. Supreme Court Case Tennessee vs. Garner for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us