Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Go to advanced search...

U.S. Supreme Court Tennessee vs. Garner - Case Study Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Various socio-legal institutions including the courts and the police are often expected to give expression to the collective conscience of the society. Though, it is a fact that the collective conscience is quiet a complex and multifaceted notion…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.6% of users find it useful
U.S. Supreme Court Case Tennessee vs. Garner
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "U.S. Supreme Court Tennessee vs. Garner"

Download file to see previous pages The various arms and appendages of law while towing the practical manifestations of their powers do sometimes give way to special situations that alter and remold the conscience of a society and bring them under direct and enhanced observation and scrutiny of the masses and the intelligentsia. Infact such instances happen to be the important turning points in the legal and judicial history of any nation and do many a times lead to the evolution of the existing statutory provisions in the light of the current and emerging changes in the society. US Supreme Court case Tennessee vs. Garner is one such thought provoking event in the legal history of the US that strikingly challenged the existing statutory provisions pertaining to the use of force by the law enforcement agencies and called for reinterpretation and reshaping of this earlier taken for granted aspect of the policing in the US.

October 3, 1974 was one other usual day in the life of the Memphis Police Officers Leslie Wright and Eton Hymon, when they were ordered to respond to a "prowler inside call". Both the officers promptly arrived on the scene of crime and after receiving relevant feedback from the neighbors, proceeded to scan the house being targeted. Hymon noticed a person running across the backyard and with the aid of his flashlight, was reasonably able to discern that the suspect, Edward Garner was an unarmed teenager of slight built (Findlaw, 2008). When Garner tried to climb over a fence, Hymon shot him in the back of his head to prevent him from escaping from the scene of crime (Findlaw, 2008). Later on a paltry ten dollars and a ring stolen from the house being scanned was found on the body of the suspect.
Hymon acted in direct exercise of the authority given by a Tennessee statute to its police officers, sanctioning a deadly use of force so as to apprehend a fleeing suspect (Findlaw, 2008). The father of the deceased teenager filed a suit in the Federal District Court, to seek damages for the death and violation of his son's constitutional rights (Findlaw, 2008). The District Court upheld the constitutional credentials of the given statute and declared the officer's actions to be legal and valid (Findlaw, 2008). However, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, while responding to an appeal by the appellee-respondent, reversed, stating that the use of force against a fleeing suspect in pursuance of the requirements of the Fourth Amendment is subject to be qualified in the light of the criteria of reasonableness (Findlaw, 2008).
The basic issue that this case brings to fore is the ascertaining of the constitutionality of the deadly use of force by the law enforcement agencies against an unarmed, fleeing suspect (Findlaw, 2008). It questions the gross generalization of the provisions pertaining to the use of force by the law enforcement agencies against the relatively innocuous suspects who try to flee. Should the nature or proportion of force used by a police team against an escaping terrorist be same as that used against a harmless teenager, who attempts to escape from the scene of some petty crime This case highlights the human rights of the fleeing suspects and pragmatically checks the unrestrained use of force by t ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“U.S. Supreme Court Case Tennessee vs. Garner Study”, n.d.)
U.S. Supreme Court Case Tennessee vs. Garner Study. Retrieved from
(U.S. Supreme Court Case Tennessee Vs. Garner Study)
U.S. Supreme Court Case Tennessee Vs. Garner Study.
“U.S. Supreme Court Case Tennessee Vs. Garner Study”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF U.S. Supreme Court Case Tennessee vs. Garner


...?Kelo vs. of New London, 2005, 5-4. The 2005 case of Kelo vs. of New London concerned the power of government(s) to force the sale of private property if it falls within the eminent domain. If the property is intended for a legitimate “public” use, then its sale can be forced, provided the owner refuses to sell it. The Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution, in the so-called “Takings Clause,” allows the government to mandate the sale of property for purposes of eminent domain provider the owner is justly compensated (Kelo). This was specifically added to the Bill of Rights in order to prevent the sovereign (government) from arbitrarily seizing property for illegitimate or corrupt purposes. The City of New London, Connecticut sought...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment

Supreme Court Case

... the right to the benefit is not equivalent to a property right, it is not mandatory as a constitutional guarantee. Another implication is that future administrative actions should take into consideration the injury to those deprived and give it precedence over the pecuniary setback to the government, where the human dilemma is tantamount to a “grievous loss” (397 U. S. 263). References Beermann, J. M. (2010) Administrative Law. New York, NY: Aspen Publishers Goldberg v Kelly (1970) Supreme Court Cases: The Dynamic Court (1930-1999), 1999 Harrington, C. B., & Carter, L. H. (2009). Administrative Law and Politics: Cases and Comments (4th ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press. ISBN: 9780872899346 Ho, D.E. & Ross, E.L. (2009) “Did Liberal Justices...
8 Pages(2000 words)Research Paper

Supreme Court case

...?The Roe versus Wade Case Introduction This present study focuses on the Roe versus Wade case, which was decided in 1973. The discussion presented inthis essay will seek to provide valid facts refuting the judgment that was issued in this case. The Roe versus Wade case The Roe versus Wade case is a landmark case that was decided upon in 1973 by the United States’ Supreme Court and the judgment issued in this case has still been a topic of discussion 40 years after the controversial judgment was issued. The case was originally filed in 1970, by Coffee and Weddington on behalf of Norma McCorvey who has been referred in the case as Jane Roe and the defendant in the case was the Attorney Henry Wade of the Dallas County District. The final...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Supreme court justices- controversial case

...Supreme Court Justices-Controversial Case Since the time of the constitution, the notion of separation of church and has been not only an issue of much debate but also an issue challenged in multiple ways within supreme court rulings. According to the separation of church and state, the government has no jurisdiction over religious ceremonies or practices which are church affiliated. This applies to the arena of marriage as in most cases, it is under some type of religious authority that marriages take place. Additionally, the government should not be able to dictate who may or may not be married depending on gender differences or similarities. Most commonly, the separation of church and state applies to autonomous maintenance of both...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Supreme Court Case of Significance

...Abstract The essay is written to proffer at least one Supreme Court case of significance related to three of the provisions of the First Amendment. In addition, the rights and responsibilities that the Constitution provides an individual as an American citizen would be evaluated. These issues would be discussed in terms of the rationale for determining the need to discuss each case to be heard and interpreted by the Supreme Court. Finally, the essay would determine how the Supreme Court’s decision in each case continues to affect the rights of American citizens today. Reflections on the First Amendment Law in society is best understood as an endeavor – a living institution performing social tasks. The legal order is more...
8 Pages(2000 words)Term Paper

The Case Involving Garner against Tennessee

...The Case Involving Garner against Tennessee The case involving Garner against Tennessee is a 1985 is a case under the Fourteenth Amendment of the American constitution which allows law enforcement officers to use lethal force for purposes of preventing a suspect from escaping. This force is only allowed if the suspect is dangerous, and the officer can prove that their lives were in danger, or that of other people within the given circumstance. In this case, the police shot dead a fleeing teenager suspected of burglary after he defied orders to stop by the police (Pollock and Klotter, 2009). The police were sure that the teenager was unarmed, but still they shot him relying on the Tennessee deadly force statute that authorized use...
1 Pages(250 words)Research Paper

Supreme Court Case: Juvenile Justice

...Supreme Court Case Matters resulting from juvenile criminal behavior are rarely brought to the Supreme Court in the United States. However, at the start of the 1960s, the Supreme Court tried a number of juvenile cases that led to drastic changes in the procedures and character of justice system (Siegel and Senna, 2009). This essay looks into one of the most influential cases in the juvenile justice system, Kent v. United States. This case was a landmark in the justice in the justice system at large as the most powerful court in the country had consented to decide on a case that the appellant had claimed unfair treatment at the juvenile court. This case was involving a sixteen year old Morris Kent that was charged with robbery and rape...
2 Pages(500 words)Assignment

The Tennessee v. Garner Case

... The Tennessee v. Garner Case The importance of the Tennessee v. Garner case was that it was a hallmark matter which required the attention, hearing and resolution through the highest court in the country. This was due to the fact that it touched on the constitutional provisions on the notion of what was considered to lie within the “margin of reasonable force.” It was critical because the law of the land or the state stipulated that under those circumstances, it was reasonable to use such force. However, the appellee respondent questioned the veracity of those actions under 42 U.S.C. 1983 for alleged violation of fundamental rights of the deceased (Walker & Fridell, 1992). Issue The gist of the matter was on the constitutional...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment

Tennessee V. Garner

... Tennessee V. Garner Case Overview This 1985 case in which the US Supreme Court held that under the fourth amendment, in pursuit of a fleeing suspect, an enforcement officer may not use deadly force to facilitate arrest by preventing escape unless the officer has sufficient probable course to believe that the suspect is of serious threat to the officer or any other person and can cause severe physical injury or death. This was a landmark ruling that changed operation models within many police departments under the American criminal justice system. Facts of the case During a routine response to a call on a burglary in progress on October 3, 1974, two officers, Hymon and Wright from the Memphis police department arrived at an address...
7 Pages(1750 words)Research Paper

Psychology Behind Supreme Court Case

... against her in the New Jersey Supreme Court, citing the same reason that the search conducted by the school authorities violated her Fourth Amendment Rights (Slobogin 207). The New Jersey Supreme Court concluded that the search was indeed unreasonable and consequently reversed the conviction of T.L.O., setting her free. The state of New Jersey appealed against the reversal of T.L.O.’s conviction in the US Supreme Court. The US Supreme Court ruled in favor of the State of New Jersey, by a resounding margin of 6-3, declaring that the search conducted by the school authorities was valid and thereby the exclusionary principle did not apply to the evidence presented against T.L.O. While delving on the psychology behind this Supreme Case...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Tragic Hero Supreme of Shakespeare and Sophocles

In analyzing Sophocles’ play Antigone and Shakespeare’s play Othello, we find at least two such tragic heroes in the title characters. Although both characters exhibit characteristics of the tragic hero, it is my contention that Othello proves the stronger representation.
At the opening of each play, both Othello and Antigone display a noble stature in their relationships to the powers that be. Antigone is a princess of Thebes as the play opens following the death of her father and the subsequent deaths of her brothers at each other’s hands (194-95). Being ordered not to bury the brother who brought war to the gates of Thebes by the new king Creon, Antigone decides to risk the king’s wrath in favor of...
7 Pages(1750 words)Case Study

The Case of R v Turnbull

The defendants planned to rob a bank’s customer deposits in the bank’s safe by posting a notice diverting the dropbox to another location, which they planned to burgle. Several customers did, in fact, drop their wallets loaded with money into the dropbox, however, one customer was suspicious and alerted the police. The strength of the prosecution’s case rested on the visual recognition provided by a police constable who clearly saw one of the defendants removing a sign from the bank premises and recognized him. On this basis, the court of appeal concluded that the appeal of the defendants could not stand. It was held that if visual identification had been the only evidence, the outcome would not have been definit...
10 Pages(2500 words)Case Study

A Warrant of Arrest Issued by a Court

... US 543 (1968). Altlaw. 2 August 2008. ˂˃ Carroll v. US, 267 US 132 (1925). Altlaw. 2 August 2008 ˂˃ Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969). Altlaw. 1 August 2008. ˂˃ Coolidge v. New Hampshire 403 US 443 (1971). Altlaw. 2 August 2008. ˂˃ City of Indianapolis v Edmund, 531 US 32 (2000). Altlaw. 3 August 2008. ˂˃ Delaware v Prouse, 440 US 648 (1979). Altlaw. 1 August 2008. ˂˃ Horton v. California, 496 U. S. 128 (1990). Justia Supreme Court Center. 30 July 2008. ˂˃ Michigan...
13 Pages(3250 words)Case Study

Cultural Value Orientations: German vs. Turkish

When organizational culture is discussed in the context of national culture, it is based on certain assumptions. According to Schein (2004 qt. Browaeys and Price 2008) culture can be defined as:

"...a set of basic assumptions - shared solutions to universal problems of external adaptation (how to survive) and internal integration (how to stay together) - which have evolved over time and are handed down from one generation to the next".

External adaptation here refers to factors or culture which the management can control while internal integration means the relationship which binds them to the group. In this context management styles and approaches are often influenced by the cultural value orientation - that...
7 Pages(1750 words)Case Study

The British Constitution vs The Human Rights Act 1998

This research essay analyses the above statement and arrives at a conclusion.
Integration of the provisions of ECHR into U.K’s domestic law by way of HRA 1998 can be regarded as revolutionary as it facilitates the majority of the ECHR rights provisions directly applicable in the U.K. Before that integration, a U.K Court has to presume that when there is a clash between U.K’s domestic law and ECHR rights provision, the ECHR rights provision will always prevail. This principle has been laid down in R v Secretary of Home Dept ex parte Brind1 and R v Secretary of Home Dept ex parte Thakrar. 2
Courts have now the power to declare any statue which they find incompatible with ECHR provisions and order for fine-tunin...
9 Pages(2250 words)Case Study

The United States Supreme Court

The Court, consisting of nine lifelong justices, bears complete authority over the Federal courts but has lesser power over those of the states. It has the power of “last word” on decisions made by these Federal courts and makes the rules that these courts have to follow in their procedures (Wagman, 1993). In addition, all Federal courts must abide by the decisions laid down by the Supreme Court, as well as the United States Constitution. With respect to state courts, the interpretations and decisions that the Supreme Court makes apply, but the Court is limited to interpreting and changing Federal laws, not state laws. Thus, the Supreme Court cannot change conditions of state constitutions or interpret laws made by ind...
10 Pages(2500 words)Coursework

The Idea of Liberty in Sam Slime Case

... Sam Slime This could certainly be the case of the rich get richer and the poor go to jail, especially in a country that is trying to serve many masters. The government of the United States is certainly a political and governmental entity, but at it heart it has almost always been a voice of corporate business and expansion of wealth for the few. It operates seemingly under the principle guise of what is good for business is good for the people. One could say that the state of the economy today is the fallout of this mindset. In the “Sam Slime” case study we see the idea of liberty as applied by several masters. The first, when Sam Slime mugs you outright is a matter for governmental law and order. Cleary there is a criminal (Sam...
8 Pages(2000 words)Coursework

Analysis of OReilly v Mackman Case

Judicial review is a concept which is constitutionally undecided as it on one side, it shores up the rule of law, democracy, and pre-eminence of parliament by facilitating the courts to check the boundaries of government authority and on another side, the courts are open to the decision on the plants based on the fact of separation of authorities that are intimating with the verdicts of democratically elected institutions. Judicial review is not apprehended with the virtues of government assessment but deals with whether the deciding authority has remained within the legal boundaries and whether broad principles of rationality and fairness adhere. The constitutional basis of judicial review is debated as one view holds that it is...
8 Pages(2000 words)Case Study

John Rawls vs Robert Nozick: Social Justice

It is logical to look at political philosophy within the framework of history and ethics emerging from it. As could be observed, the question of justice, and how we perceive its nature has remained the prime concern throughout history. This will include, among other things, the existence of specific obligations towards each other and towards the state, the existence of natural rights, claims of property/liberty and equality.

In face of this, the Anglo-American political philosophy has seen famous philosophers like John Rowels, Robert Nozick and recently Amritya Sen to focus on issues and arguments concerning the above...(political Philosophy, 2005 pp1)

As political philosophy is about politics mainly, it s...

6 Pages(1500 words)Coursework

Analysis of Tourism and Hospitality Law Case

 The main issue that needs to be tackled first is whether there is a valid contract between Richard Brat, carrying on trade as Brighton Greens, (buyer) and Molly and Kelly trading in First Grade Granny Smith apples as Holy Farm.

Apparently, there was, when considering their verbal and written mail sent by Richard to Holy Farm on August 1 reading as follows –“Please deliver 20 boxes –Granny Smith ‘Brighton Greens’. Cheque mailed.“

It may be seen that the mail order does not specify the category or grade of apples to be supplied, but one of the implied conditions of sale could be that the goods ordered need to correspond with the goods inspected and tested.

In th...
8 Pages(2000 words)Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Case Study on topic U.S. Supreme Court Case Tennessee vs. Garner for FREE!

Contact Us