The Influence of Hybrid Warriors in Future Wars - Research Paper Example

One can see that the US soldiers deployed in different missions face a number of problems like lack of skills, cultural insensitivity, failure in collecting information, and reconstruction of war-torn areas. In addition, the rapid change from counterinsurgency measures to traditional warfare leads to a number of problems. But the claim that the enemies are well equipped to withstand large scale operations/conventional warfare and the example of Israeli defeat in Lebanon in the year 2000 (Hezbollah rocket attack), does not prove that conventional warfare is outdated.

Cordesman stated that “Israel’s problems in the security zone were legion and were sharply influenced by its lack of any real political support in Lebanon” (411). At the same time, the claim that the US failure in Falluja, Iraq (2004) was due to the lack of systematic warfare is wrong because the reason behind the failure is that the US Forces underestimated the insurgents. The claim that the international terrorist groups like Al Qaeda follow conventional and irregular warfare (say, in Iraq, in the year 2007) is a little bit confusing because most of the terrorist groups always follow conventional warfare.

But the main problem faced by the US Forces during the Vietnam War was the lack of information on the combination of guerrilla warfare (Viet Cong) and systematic warfare (North Vietnam Army). The claim that the wars in Lebanon (in the year 2006), Falluja (in the year 2004) and Vietnam War prove that combination of regular and irregular warfare can influence the end result, but this does not prove that regular warfare is totally outdated.