Improving the Health of the Population through Proportionate Universalism - Essay Example

Health sciences and medicine By 10th November Proportionate universalism is the act of ensuring that there is an equality of the access to better health for all the residents in a given society. The society has been disintegrated in a big dimension in the capitalism world. The capitalism has created a difference in the ability to contact a quality fitness services (Andre & Velasquez, 1998). The result in a given society prompts that the rich can access the health facilities quickly while the poor cannot. The intention for this submission is that the rich have the money, and the poor do not have (Kirby, 2000). Since the health facilities are at the present sold at a market price, the poor in the society become disadvantaged from the services. Health policies that have been put in place in many countries do not provide a sufficient platform of overcoming inequalities in the provision of health facilities in the society. The social and health policies need to be reviewed in edict to give a boost to the social and health workers in the society (Rowlingson, 2011). The society and health providers need to realize the importance of a healthy society in the national building. In every country, a healthy society is seen as the propelling factor towards the growth of the economy in a given country. The TMA report on overcoming the inequality in the provision of health to the society largely focuses on the Marmot review. Marmot takes a glance on the social health and submits some various proportions that need to be applied in order to bring equality and sanity in the health sector. In his review, he focuses his abilities to the nation of England (Local Government Association, n.d.). Four outlined tasks need to be clarified. The task in the identification of the inequality in the society that makes it impossible for the provision of the health needs. After the identification, the next level will be to show the substantiation to how the identified dynamics leads to the creation of inequality (United Nations, 2012). The next measure from the evidence will be to identify some objectives that will lead to demolishing of the inequality and create equality in the medical field. For example, it can be assumed that the high medical fees in the public hospitals may accompany child mortality in the society. In order to overcome this, we need to create an objective that will ensure the medical fee has dropped to affordable levels. Thereafter, the health and social groups need to put the strategies developed into practise in overcoming the inequality. Marmot makes some comments concerning the effect of vigour inequality in England (Barry & Yuill, 2008). He first says that the number of people who are dying due to inequality in health provision is high. He says that if these inequalities are removed out of the way, these people could be living a much longer time. I will agree with Marmot in one way; most of the people usually die to the lack of adequate funds towards the access of the health facilities. On the other hand, most of the health facilities have been made accessible even to the poor. The inequality usually occurs when the need to treat a certain disease like cancer which requires a highly expensive procedures. Thus, the rich are the one that usually get access to such facilities (Stockbridge, 2009). If the costs for such expensive treatments are brought down, then most of the people can afford the treatment and consequently live longer. In every society, Marmot remarks that there is a social incline in terms of health (Rowlingson, 2011). He suggests that the social gradient to health is caused by their ability to access the health services. I wish to come into understanding with him. The position of every person in the society dictates his or her ability to acquire basic treatment. For that reason, the rich’s level of acquisition of the service is usually greater than that of the poor in the society. Equality in provision of health facilities will ensure that the gradient level has been lowered. There are many challenges that are associated with the provision of health facilities to the citizens of a given country. As Marmot suggested, inequality in the health provision is evidence in mortality within a society. The challenges are often concomitant with the fiscal performance in a given nation (Stockbridge, 2009). Marmot’s case is developed with reference to the nation of England. The nation under discussion can claim to be in a good position to provide better health facilities to her citizens as it is ranked as one of the best economies in the world. The country is able to produce the best social and health workers through training and mentorship programs. The country’s situation in economic performance can also aid the public in the free provision of health requirements. The disparities in health performance are, therefore, supposed to be witnessed in the developing nations rather than the developed nations. In the developing countries, there are many difficulties that are witnessed in the training and acquisition of health facilities. The countries mostly depend on the AID and grants from the developed nations for the provision of this facilities. Therefore, their performance in comparison to the developed nations is rather low (Douglas et al., 2009). They do lack adequate facilities such as trained medical staffs as well as the social workers. The sick in these countries also fell short of the necessary funds that will help them acquire the treatments from the available global institutions. With regard to these problems, the inequality in the developing nations is a bit higher than developed world. The delivery of well-being facilities is essential to every member of society (Jones & Douglas, 2011). The health of the nation should and must always be put ahead in the policy making of every country. When a nation is healthy, the economic performance will always be at higher levels. Countries need to invest much in ensuring that there is equity in the provision of these services. Equality will guarantee members of the society an assurance that his or her health is being looked into and will get encouraged to perform their duties very well. References Andre, C. & Velasquez, M., 1998. A Healthy Bottom Line: Profits or People?. [Online] Available at: http://www.scu.edu/ethics/publications/iie/v1n4/healthy.html [Accessed 10 November 2014]. Barry, A.-M. & Yuill, C., 2008. Understanding the Sociology of Health: An Introduction. New York: Sage. Douglas, J. et al., 2009. A Reader in Promoting Public Health. New York: Sage. Jones, L. J. & Douglas, J., 2011. Public Health: Building Innovative Practice. New York: SAGE Publications. Kirby, M., 2000. Sociology in Perspective. London: Heinemann. Local Government Association, n.d. Marmot Review report: Fair Society, Healthy Lives. [Online] Available at: http://www.local.gov.uk/health//journal_content/56/10180/3510094/ARTICLE [Accessed 10 November 2014]. Rowlingson, K., 2011. Does income inequality cause health and social problems?. [Online] Available at: http://www.jrf.org.uk/sites/files/jrf/inequality-income-social-problems-full.pdf [Accessed 10 November 2014]. Stockbridge, M., 2009. Economic growth and development. [Online] Available at: http://www.cefims.ac.uk/cedepapp/116_web_unit/page_08.htm [Accessed 10 November 2014]. United Nations, 2012. Addressing inequalities: The heart of the post-2015 agenda and the future we want for all. [Online] Available at: http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/pdf/10_inequalities_20July.pdf [Accessed 10 November 2014]. Read More