Correlation between Quality of Life and Mental Health - Essay Example

"Correlation between Quality of Life and Mental Health" is a brilliant example of a paper on the disorder. 
Quality of life (QOL) is a subjective well-being. QOL reflects on the variation, the gap, between the optimism and expectations of someone and their current experience. People’s adaptations are such that life expectations are often altered so as they belong within the realm of what people identify to be feasible. It is the level to which an individual enjoys the essential possibilities of their lives. These potentials are outcomes of the prospects and limitations that individuals have in their lives, and reflect the interface of personal and environmental aspects.  Enjoyment comprises the experience of satisfaction and the possession or achievement of some traits. The QOL can be measured through the extent to which an individual’s happiness needs are met. This entails those requirements that are necessities to any person’s happiness, without which no member of society can attain happiness. QOL comprises the aspect of physical health, individual hygiene, diet, exercise, and tidying, clothing, and physical manifestation. It as well comprises a person’s psychological health and regulation, cognition, feelings, and assessment regarding the self as well as self-discipline. Curtis argues that patients of mental illness have the right to a quality life that entails adequate care and treatment. The increased liberty, and freedom for mentally ill patients, released from institutions lead to their rise in quality life, as changes in mental-health treatment lead to novel potential to a lifetime of institutionalization.

Further deinstitutionalization, is a durable inclination, ensuring that fewer people are confined in mental institutions, and lesser mental health treatments are offered, in public hospitals. This is an outcome of the procedure of shutting down hospitals that are public and transferring patients to community based mental-health institutions and services. Most people feel that the mentally ill have immensely achieved a hugely increased measure of liberty as they are close to family and humanity. This ensures that patients are able to hold jobs and enjoy amenities while interacting with the mainstream community (Curtis, 2008)

However, deinstitutionalization has not been without criticism. Studies indicate that this concept has only managed to withdraw the patients out of hospitals, and transferred them into prisons, because of their incapability to live within the stipulated norms of society, as well as the misunderstanding of mental sickness. Furthermore, a distinct parallel arises through homeless difficulty and deinstitutionalization. As research has shown, numerous of the homeless are affected by mental-sickness related diseases such as drug addiction. Additionally, homeless shelters lack the capability or facilities to cure the mental illness they are insecurely placed daily. Furthermore, the community lacks the fundamental comprehension of mental illness and fears the incursion of these patients into their neighborhood resulting in immense stigmatic association from deinstitutionalization (Curtis, 2008).

Conclusion

Mental illness is a reality in people’s lives and adequate measures should be adapted to address it speedily. This should entail civic education to all people both patients and society included to avoid discrimination and improve better care for patients. It should also extend to police officers and fire service providers to prepare for quick response during emergencies.