The Relationship between Multidisciplinary and Discharge Outcomes after Total Hip Replacement - Essay Example

The Relationship Between Multidisciplinary and Discharge Outcomes and Functional Status after Total Hip Replacement Ridge-Goodson 1. What problem would be solved by the knowledge generated by this study? According to Ridge-Goodson (2004), “Pain and mobility were assessed at time of discharge, and the functional status measures were repeated at 3 months after hospital discharge by mail.” This study will help to indicate the functioning ability of patients after they have been discharged following a total hip replacement. In turn, the surgery and aftercare procedures could be enhanced in order to increase the quality of life of a patient following total hip replacement if the study indicates certain areas of difficulty that patients are having following the surgery. 2. What findings in this report did the author think were significant? List them below. Are these findings clinically significant? Why or why not? The functional status for the participants was found to have a significant difference for physical and psychosocial dimensions of functional status. They are clinically significant because it helps the doctor to understand the patients’ conditions better, which can help them come up with better tools. These findings are clinically significant simply because the tools to help can be increased following the study. 3. Do you believe the findings from this study are reliable and valid? Why or why not? The findings from this study that were based on descriptive statistics include pain, mobility, sickness impact profile, scattergram profiles, and Hip Outcome Tool profiles. Research findings were also based on satisfaction and family support (Ridge-Goodson, 2000). Therefore, the findings from the study are reliable and valid. They are based on good tests and solid statistics that have been tested throughout time. 4. What is the transferability of the findings from this study? With what population would it be appropriate to apply these findings? In what setting would it be appropriate to apply these findings? What barrier(s) or facilitator(s) might you encounter? The same age group would be appropriate, along with the same population they used. I cannot think of any barriers except for special situations. The transferability of the findings from this study would be good because it was based on solid tools, tests, and statistics. The setting where this would be appropriate to apply these findings would be the patient’s home or long-term care facility following the total hip replacement. 5. How would you evaluate the impact of applying these findings on a patient? What resources would be necessary to implement the study findings (staff education, etc.)? What specific criteria would you use to measure the effect of applying these findings According to Ridge-Goodson (2000), “Further research examining the use of the hip outcome tool as an overall stand-alone functional status in primary total hip replacement patient’s measure should be pursued. The same criteria should be used.” The impact of applying these findings on a patient is significant. As previously mentioned, the findings from the study can help to enhance the quality of life of a patient following total hip replacement surgery. Research Report: Gance-Cleveland 1. What problem would be solved by the knowledge generated by this study? According to Gance-Cleveland (2000), the objective was to “examine the features, critical attributes, processes, and benefits of school-based support groups for adolescents with an addictive parent.” The knowledge generated by this study could help adolescents better deal with having an addictive parent. They could find useful information to use at home, as well as locate support groups outside of the home to help them deal with the problems that they are having. This is especially true for support groups within schools, because that is where adolescents spend a great deal of time outside of the home. There, they can even connect with other adolescents going through the same problems with dealing with an addictive parent in their homes. 2. What were the statistically significant findings in this report? List them below. Are these findings clinically significant? Why or why not? According to Gance-Cleveland (2004), “A qualitative evaluation using the ethnographic method was conducted at two Midwestern suburban high schools… Findings from this study suggest that school-based support groups are beneficial to adolescents with addicted parents. Experiential knowledge is the foundation of these self-help groups. School-based support group participation enhanced self-knowledge and led to self-care and self-healing. The school-based support groups expanded the adolescents’ awareness, resulting in their ability to make critical choices that facilitated changes in the dysfunctional pattern. Support group participation empowered youth to make these changes.” These findings are clinically significant because they are based on solid tools, tests, and evidence. They can be used to evaluate other situations of the same type as well. 3. Do you believe the findings from this study are reliable and valid? Why or why not? Student support groups were found and those adolescents with an addictive parent were found to perform better under added support and greater participation. Group participation was found to increase knowledge, enhance coping skills, increase resilience, as well as improve relationships and school performance (Gance-Cleveland, 2004). The findings from this study appear to be reliable and valid. They were based on solid application of tools. 4. What is the transferability of the findings from this study? With what population would it be appropriate to apply these findings? In what setting would it be appropriate to apply these findings? What barrier(s) or facilitator(s) might you encounter? Descriptive statistics involved a study of demographics and ethnocentric studies. The research findings were also based on curriculum study (Gance-Cleveland, 2004). Therefore, the transferability of these findings would be good. The population that would be appropriate to apply these findings would be to teens, adolescents, and young adults, and some of the data could even apply to older adults, but not all of it. Another study would need to be conducted for that. One barrier that might be encountered is the fact that adolescents are prone to lie or withhold the truth when answering personal questions of this nature. That could significantly skew the results of the study. It would be important to encourage anonymity. 5. How would you evaluate the impact of applying these findings on a patient? What resources would be necessary to implement the study findings (staff education, etc.)? What specific criteria would you use to measure the effect of applying these findings? I agree with the author’s conclusion, and this study can be applied to my clinical practice. This really gives me inside knowledge on how support groups can be beneficial to kids with addicted parents (Gance-Cleveland, 2004). The impact of applying these findings on a patient would be that they could access help that they might not otherwise find had the study not taken place. Furthermore, they can access that help where it is convenient for them—at school and surrounded by some of their peers that are facing the same challenges. Staff education would definitely be required in order to address an issue of this magnitude. Criteria that could be used could be age of child, age of parent, what type of addiction the parent is suffering from, how long it has been going on, the effects on the child, the effects on the parent, whether or not any previous therapy has been sought for either the parent or the child, and the like. References Gance-Cleveland, B. (2004). Qualitative evaluation of a school-based support group for adolescents with an addicted parent. Nursing Research 53:6. Ridge, R.A. and A.S. Goodson. (2000). The relationship between multidisciplinary and discharge outcomes and functional status after total hip replacement. Orthopaedic Nursing 19:1. . Read More