Whether the Personality Profile Is Accurate Based on the Result of the Big Five Traits - Assignment Example

Personality Profile Reflection Name Institution Introduction Interacting with a set of characteristics is what is referred as personality. The rationale of this read is to reflect on personal profile. The paper analyzes whether the personality profile is accurate based on the result of the big five traits. It also seeks to find out the managerial strengths and weaknesses and why they are strengths and weakness. Further, it also looks forward to knowing how I can strengthen my profile and improves on weaknesses. Question 1: Determining whether my profile is accurate based on evidence Personality is regarded as an interacting set of characteristics. In this regard, I am reflecting on my profile to evaluate whether it is accurate. All aspects of personality are related, and they should interact with each other (Mlinarič & Podlesek 2013). It would not be accurate to imagine that a high score on a particular trait on my profile amounts to accuracy. Based on the result of my big five score for neuroticism, I got an average score. Neuroticism is a tendency to act with negative emotions to frustrations, threat or loss (Vanessa 2013). As a neurotic person, I can be motivated to work hard to avoid disappointing my colleagues. I am not highly affected by neuroticism as I have a high level of conscientiousness. Conscientious people are always good planners and perfect (Chan 2014). As much as I experience worry, I channel them into positive behaviors. Additionally, I do not get angry easily which enables me deal with my emotions appropriately. As a manager, I often get stressed and depressed, but the most important thing is how I deal with this conditions. Neurotic persons often look for ways that help them channel the anxiety which motivates them even work gets harder. It is necessary to be composed to avoid stress which can lead to neuroticism disorders (Musek 2007). Conversely, as a manager it is necessary to have low scores on neuroticism, as you will be understood to be relatively less reactive to stress, emotionally stable and more importantly tend to be calm. It is not appropriate for managers to have the inability to deal with negative emotions since the management job is not a simple task (Bozionelos, 2004). However, you can be able to deal perfectly with positive feeling. Additionally, my big five indicates that I love making friends, I am a cheerful person, and I always get involved with other persons. These are positive traits that make my profile look even much better and accurate. Extraverts often take actions, they are enthusiastic, and more importantly they do not like missing an opportunity (Matzle, Bidmon, & Kräuter 2006). A sample of my traits includes; attending parties, initiating conversation, associating with people in parties. Additionally, I do not mind being the center of attraction and always feel comfortable around people. My score on Extraversion is average indicating that I am neither a controlled loner nor cheerful gossip. I always enjoy the companionship of others, and I also enjoy my time alone. Extraversion is trait that is involved in engagement to the external world (Thomas 2006). Another trait that makes my profile accurate is my level of agreeableness. The level of my agreeableness is high indicating that I am mindful of other people’s interests and well-being. As an agreeable person, I have a positive understanding of human nature. I believe that other persons are trustworthy, decent and honest. As the result for my Big five shows, I posses high score on Conscientiousness. This is a trait where one acts impulsively. Some impulsive decisions are not always right as they may result in inherent consequences, in the long run. Sometimes it is necessary to make snap decisions and the first impulse becomes the most effective response (Schinkel 2007). My high score for conscientiousness means that I act impulsively. I have great orderliness of issues; I am hard working and act reliably. High scores mean self-efficiency, cautiousness, and self-discipline. Conscientious people are said to be orderly, reliable, dutiful and hardworking (Zopiatis & Constanti 2012). Openness distinguishes between imaginative and creative people. Open people are often curious, cautious on beauty and appreciative of art (Lussier 2009). Result for Big five indicates that my score for openness to experience is average which indicates that I have a passion for tradition and also willing try new stuff. Openness to experience requires that a person should have the ability to think in abstractions and symbols. I have the ability to symbolic cognition such as logical, mathematical geometric thinking, use of metaphorical language among others. Open persons are intellectually inquisitive, sensitive to beauty, and they highly appreciate nature (Pierre 2007). In my result for openness, I have an average score an artistic interest and a high score for adventure. Question 2: What My managerial Job Strengths and Weaknesses are and Why As found in the research that I have carried out on my profile, I can clearly outline my strengths and weakness. The strength that I possess as a manager includes conscientiousness. This trait enables impulsive decisions when necessary. It helps me to be efficient in performing managerial roles. This character has helped me be orderly, self-disciplined, cautious and dutiful in an administrative position. The result for my big five indicates that I have a high score on self-discipline, cautiousness, orderliness and dutifulness. My other strength lies in the high level of agreeableness. This helps me relate well with the employees as I am mindful of their well-being and interest. I always sympathize with them during their trying times and help them get out of their problem. Nevertheless, I have some shortcomings in my profile as a manager. The high level of agreeableness may compromise decisions which are tight and objective. It is a requirement that a manager should at times make decisions that are firm. My other weakness is neuroticism. This is the inability to deal effectively with the usual demands of life. I am usually affected by anxiety which frequently affects my role as a manager. Ideally, personality is regarded as an interacting set of characteristics. In that line, I believe that my profile should incorporate all the Big five factors to make it accurate. I should possess an average score on Extraversion to ensure that I enjoy time with others, as well as myself. Agreeableness is also is also an important trait in the sense that I should be cooperative and sympathetic with others. I high score on Conscientiousness means that I have well-set goals and so determined to achieve them. Question 3: How to Use my Profile strengths to the Best and Address Profile Weakness in order to be an Effective Manager As a manager, I should make sure I use my profile strengths appropriately. I should be able to have a healthy interaction with the external world. As conscientious person is, I should always think about the future before making an impulsive decision. For instance, as a manager I should think intelligently in the sensitive matters of the organization such as purchase of new machinery to avoid future problem. To improve on agreeableness, I should have a healthy engagement with other employees in a manner that does not compromise sensitive decisions of the organization. For example, holding discussions and conversations with other members of the staff will add value to the organization. The results for my big five indicates a high score on cooperation. As a manager I should be useful, to the maximum, in the organization. I should cooperate with other members of staff in the organization’s activities. For instance, I should join my colleagues during events such as team building. Cooperation in every organization improves communication and better implementation of organization policies (Durand, Newby, Peggs & Siekierka 2013). This involvement will lead to agreeableness which calls for harmony and cooperation. Agreements will portray an intense interest for others. The character of openness is also crucial in the management as it indicates enjoying of traditions and wiliness to try new things (Durand, Newby, Peggs & Siekierka 2013). In addressing my weaknesses as a neurotic, I should avoid issues that will lead to anxiety, anger and depression. A healthy neurotic is one who has a high level of conscientiousness. The person may experience anxiety but they act on the anxiety and what motivates them is dealing with the problem that has put them to that state (Margolis, 2008). All the personality traits are connected and relates to each other. There is a need to focus on all the big five aspects of personality (Raad 2000). Conclusion In conclusion, my profile strength includes conscientiousness whereby I can make impulsive decisions. The trait enables me to be orderly, self-disciplined, dutiful and reliable. Agreeableness is another feature that makes my profile accurate. However, there is weakness in profile which is neuroticism and the inability to make tough decisions due to being agreeable. References Amanda.L.Chan. (2014, September 4). The Third Metric. Retrieved March 27, 2015, from Why Being Neurocritical, could Actually Be a Good Thing: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/09/healthy-neuroticism_n_5035297.html Top of Form Bozionelos, N. (2004). The big five of personality and work involvement. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 19, 69-81. Top of Form Durand, R. B., Newby, R., Peggs, L., & Siekierka, M. (2013). Personality. Journal of Behavioral Finance. 14, 116-133. Bottom of Form Jay C. Thomas, D. L. (2006). Comprehensive Handbook of Personality and Psychopathology, Personality, and Everyday Functioning. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Nevid, J. (2008). Psychology: Concepts and Applications. New York: Cengage Learning. Margolis, A. (2008). The Will to Will: The Effects of Neuroticism and Mortality Salience on Perceptions of Free Will and Reactions to Infringement of Freedom. New York: ProQuest. Mark R. Leary, R. H. (2013). Handbook of Individual Differences in Social Behavior. New York: Guilford Publications. Matzle, K., Bidmon, S., & Kräuter, S. G. (2006). Individual determinants of brand affect: the role of the personality traits of extraversion and openness to experience. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 400-600. Mlinarič, V., & Podlesek, A. (2013). Item context effects on Big five personality measures. Review of Psychology. 20, 1-2. Top of Form Musek, J. (2007). A general factor of personality: evidence for the Big One in the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality. 41, 1213-1233. Bottom of Form Oliver P. John, R. W. (2010). Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research. New York: Guilford Press. Pierre, J. R. (2007). Spontaneity and Personality: The Relationship Between Spontaneity, Extraversion, Neuroticism, Openness to Experience, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness. ProQuest, 2007. Robert Lussier, C. A. (2009). Leadership: Theory, Application, & Skill Development. New York: Cengage Learning. Romano, P. A. (2008). The Relationship of Extraversion to Self-efficacy and Chronic Pain Management in Women. Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest.Rouse, M. (2009, June). Retrieved March 27, 2015, from http://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/personality-profile Raad, B. d. (2000). The Big Five Personality Factors: The Psycholexical Approach to Personality. New York: Hogrefe & Huber. Schinkel, A. (2007). Conscience and Conscientious Objections. Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press. Vanessa. (2013, April 19). CNN. Retrieved from Study: Neurotics shine over time in team settings: http://edition.cnn.com/2013/04/18/business/neuroticism-at-work/ Zopiatis, A., & Constanti, P. (2012). Extraversion, openness and conscientiousness: The route to transformational leadership in the hotel industry. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 246-300. Read More