Analysis of Own Personality and Behaviors - Essay Example

Personal Profile Analysis 1.0 Introduction A personal profile analysis comprehensively describes an individual’s unique behavioral style through a self-assessment process. Today, there are various methods through which an individual can analyze his/her personality and behaviors, especially with the numerous online tests, most which are easily accessible on the internet. In this paper, I will look at some of the popular online tests available today, assessing my personality and behaviors using tests such as the Keirsey personality assessment, Jung Typology Test, the Big 5 Personality Test, and the Emotional IQ Test.

I will also assess my personality using the famous Fox/hedgehog concept which has been used since its inception in the 7th Century by a poet known as Archilochus. By understanding my personality, I will be able to know which type of roles suits me best in a teamwork or in a working environment that comprises of several individuals. 2.0 Keirsey Personality Assessment- Which temperament category am I? Keirsey Personality Assessment was established by Dr. David M. Keirsey in 1996 to help provide people with an opportunity to understand themselves better, as well as others.

The test involves taking an assessment of an individual’s temperament behaviors using the Keirsey Temperament Sorter (KTS-II). The tool categorizes the individual taking the test into one of the four main temperaments available as provided and described by the assessment test. The test configures all observable personality traits such as communication habits, attitude, talents, values and patterns of actions. The resulting temperaments fall into four main categories namely the Guardians, Artisans, Idealists, and Rationals.

My temperament according to the Keirsey Personality Assessment is categorized as Rational. Rational people, according to the test, are those who mostly speak when faced with new problems, thereby outlining the probable solutions they have for them. They are more realistic and practical when it comes to accepting the situation as it is, thereby formulate practical solutions as well. The rationals are also able to maintain calm in times of challenges and are also known to critique some cases of status quo.

In most cases, they are good in strategic planning, analyzing systems and structural designs. To a large extent, this characteristics describe my personality as I perceive it although a few of the descriptions are slightly inconsistent with my behaviors. Using my self-assessment scenario, I would describe myself as one who loves challenges and who attains great satisfaction if able to provide solutions to them. I am also good at thinking critically about situations thereby able to provide ideas that enable me to achieve most goals set for me.

However, in most cases, I am keen to follow the set rules in a society which makes it a bit inconsistent with the description of the Rational people as per the Keirsey Personality Assessment. Following the Keirsey Personality Assessment, I am able to understand that I belong to the category of people who are typically unafraid to face challenges and who are also realistic in the manner in which they solve them. This is an important trait when serving in a leadership capacity since I am able to provide sober and calculated solutions to most challenges which are an inevitable part of leadership.

However, the fact that I am very keen to following societal rules and conventions might hinder me from making tough decisions in times of need which is also an essential part of successful leadership. As earlier stated, there are four types of temperaments as classified by the Keirsey Personality Assessment. The Guardians are described as people who are keen to observe rules and conventions and are also responsible and keen to observe duties allocated to them. Idealists, on the other hand, are very ambitious, always looking to achieve their goals.

They are also keen on personal satisfaction and their personal code of ethics. Artisans are described as people who believe in a more adventurous, proactive, and hands-on approach to their duties. They are best suited to serving in operations that demand tactical talents such as marketing and crisis management. Considering a scenario where I work in a team consisting of all the four personality types, I would certainly interact differently with each of them. I would expect my interaction with the guardians and idealists, for example, to be very smooth.

This is due to the shared ideologies on keenness to responsibilities and rules as well. On the other hand, I would expect a few challenges interacting with the artisans due to their lack of keenness to obeying rules which is a contrast to my ideologies on the topic. Imagining that all these personalities work together, I would expect each to serve as complimentary to the weaknesses of the others. For example, the guardians could act as the control for the rationals and artisans lack of keenness to observation of the law in extreme cases.

Additionally, artisans would best suit to work with idealists whereby the idealists would provide ambitious plans and ideas which artisans could implement efficiently. 3.0 Jung Typology Test This is another personality test which I took and which resulted in my classification falling in the ISTJ category. I (introvert measure) score was 56 percent, meaning that I was of moderate preference for introversion. I scored 1 percent on S (sensing) which is an indication that I had no preference for sensing over intuition virtually.

My score was 50 percent on T (thinking) which indicates my moderate preference for thinking over feeling and finally, I scored 33 percent on J (judging) showing that I have a moderate preference for judging over perceiving things. The results from this test largely complements with those from the Keirsey Personality Assessment in that they both indicate my preference to thinking (critically) when faced with situations (challenges) as opposed to using my feelings. I also prefer analyzing situation critically by judging which is indicated in both tests. 4.0 Big 5 Personality Test In this test, I scored the following in the five main personality aspects; openness to experience/intellect (70 percent), conscientiousness (94 percent), Extraversion (42 percent), Agreeableness (83 percent) and Neuroticism (7 percent).

In summary, the test indicates that I am relatively open to new experiences, very organized, modestly social, courteous and supportive of others and very sober and calm in challenging situations. The test tends to complement the Keirsey Personality Assessment in most areas such as calmness in times of challenges and good organizational skills which encompass planning as a tool for effective decision-making. 5.0 Emotional IQ Test- Strengths and weakness According to the Emotional IQ Test, I scored 88 percent, with my key strengths (skills) being indicated by an ability to identify, perceive and express my emotions very well.

The test also showed a very strong ability to read emotions in others and quickly understanding how they feel. However, I have a slight weakness in my ability to react to my feelings and also those of others. As an improvement strategy, I will work to improve my listening skills and show increased empathy for others especially if they are in problems. 6.0 Fox/hedgehog concept- am I a fox or a hedgehog? In an analogy used to describe and categorize people into two main classes, the fox/hedgehog concept has been used by various individuals now.

According to a recent description of this concept by Jim Collins, foxes are described as cunning and dodgy to challenges, always looking for easier ways of evading them. However, they are adventurous and thus tend to know much. On the other hand, hedgehogs are firm in their beliefs and decisions and also tend to be straight on point on their objectives. They are also unafraid to face challenges. In his description of the hedgehog concept, Jim Collins explains the three main characteristics of hedgehog-kind-of people as ones who understand what can be economically viable, which area an individual qualifies to be the best in the world and where they are most passionate about (Leudtke 2005).

By comparing my personality against the fox/hedgehog concept, I would classify myself as a hedgehog. Some of my comparative characteristics to those of a hedgehog include calmness in the face of challenges, resilience and firmness in my decision-making processes. By using the hedgehog concept as outlined by Jim Collins, I would be able to concentrate much on what I am passionate about in life, calculating every detail that determines the viability of the actions that I need to take in life and understanding my strengths which ultimately determines my success in life. 7.0 Conclusion It is evident that an individual’s personality and traits are key to his/her success in dealing with people and consequently their achievement of success in life.

By using various personality assessment tests, one can understand their strengths and weakness which is essential for knowing which roles fit best for them and the areas where improvement is required. Bibliography Leudtke, T. J. (2005). Three Circles (From Good to Great). The Stepping Stone. Vol. 1, no. 20, p.1.