Unit2 - Individual Project - Project starting, Planning, Executing and Closing - Essay Example

Unit2-individual project Affiliation Name Introduction Project are activities carried out by organization so as to achieve specific goals and objectives usually meant to satisfy various stakeholders. The ideas are usually generated from the societies and proposals submitted to an agency capable of its implementation. Through the process, it does involve vigorous activities like planning, execution, evaluation by the project managers hence the project management theory. Throughout the life of a project it does require different managers to see into its successful implementation which constitutes a cycles so that the goals and objectives could be realized with ease.

The cycle usually act as coordination between activities and stages .for instance in the Advancement Corporation, the deputy CEO acts as the link between the Director of Research and Development and the Director of sales. The managers usually have different management styles leading to generation of more ideas. For instance picking two mangers within the life cycle of the project, they help to focus on the project objectives hence minimizing deviations from the core values since there is collective responsibility due to the fact that there is two different people involved in ideas management and generation and could be beneficial in stages of the project life (Abraham, 2013).

In the project life cycle theory, it helps reduce time completion of the project while maintaining the budget that was set by the organization. This can be attributed to the fact that, each project manager do have a specific team with whom he works with different to the other manager pursuing totally different goals but which leads to the same outcome of the project. This actions would help reduce time span of the project rather than pursuing objectives in one direction wasting time and resources.

Reduced time however may increase cost which could be recovered by getting the benefits earlier (Brouwer, 2004). Project life cycle requires effective planning, evaluation and strategic decisions about the implementation of the project. The two managers have opted to strengthen their areas, for instance R&D director advocates for the recruitment of highly qualified scientists since the organizations products greatly depends on the quality so that it can compete in the market and fetch high incomes (Seley &Hollaway, 2009).

On the other hand the sales department is gearing for better products in connections with production department to find clients for the products. The departments hence work in collective responsibilities in the interest of the organization which is beneficial to the success of the company since all departments must work together if the company problems are to be achieved. The two managers are all gearing for quality service in the process of research and are determined to do their best by employing quality personnel in the research and undertaking an extensive research in the market such is the requirement of the Advancement Corporation.

A company that uses quality resources as their primary inputs will produce high quality products and thus generate more sales which can be achieved by the two department’s performance. The criterion for success is critically based on the feedback of the society through measurement of benefits being derived from it (Young, 2013). If the market response is positive, then the project is deemed to be viable since by use of the cost-benefit, the benefits that would be derived will be much higher than the cost invested.

This measurements can be realized by increased sales revenue hence high returns for the organization. The two managers do great in their job specification and every person would try to emulate them. They make decisions and choices that are not easy by the daily lives since successful implementation of the project depends with them as they act as the pillars. During the execution of the project, the managers were tough in their decisions, stood by them and defended them by all means to ensure the projects were implemented at the right time with the allocated resources minimizing wastages or misappropriation of the funds (Abraham, 2013).

They act in good faith by making the organization a first priority so that it can realize its goals and objectives with ease. However, the managers do make decisions at times parallel with the other due to their independency. Since there is a problem, the two managers must have been neglecting their jobs as they control the key sectors of the company. The project began as to how each manager deemed it fit which might have led to problems since the managers did not consult with each other so as to be at per.

(Schwalbe, 2006).At times there was assumptions by the managers more so in super visionary issues were being taken which might have led to some steps being missed out and might have put the company in problems. For effective operations of the company all departments must be involved and should try as much to minimize their differences. Conclusion Organizations do have different departments within themselves pursuing different roles. However the divisions must work together for the success of the organization if the goals and objectives are to be achieved.

Information must flow from one area of specialization to another so that problems can be easily detected and corrective measures taken before it affects the organization as in the case of Advancement Corporations. References Weinberg, M. (2013). New sales: Simplified : the essential handbook for prospecting and new business development. New York: American Management Association. Seley, A., & Holloway, B. (2009). Sales 2.0: Improve business results using innovative sales practices and technology.

Hoboken, N.J: Wiley. Brouwer, J. (2004). Art & D: Research and development in the new art practice. Rotterdam, NLD: NAI Uitgevers Publishers. Mishra, R. C. (2005). Educational research and development. New Delhi: A.P.H. Publishing Corporation. Schwalbe, K. (2006). Introduction to project management. Boston (Mass.: Thomson Course Technology. Young, T. L. (2013). Successful Project Management. London: Kogan Page. Abraham, A. (2013). Project planning and management: An aspect of development. S.l.

: Anchor Academic Publishing.