Tools or techniques that can be used to evaluate a decision - Essay Example

Tools or techniques that can be used to evaluate a decision al affiliation) The following thesis specifically evaluates one of the core principles that enable us to make daily decisions in life. The examples cited with reference to such a theme has been intentionally taken from different scenarios and how in modest as well as extreme conditions do people correspond on either analytic problem solving realms using quantitative measure or give in to their natural, experience based, response as a first hand choice.

All in all we would focus on what parameters cause more favorable decisions and how these two fundamental influence them. Tools or techniques that can be used to evaluate a decision The prevailing 21st centaury demands an unconventionally active state of mind; while to fully comprehend these fast paced workings of nature it is imperative that man establishes a near perfect attitude towards each and every task that he potentially aims to fulfill. Humans as fragile a being as they are still take the full toll of such a demanding environment and aim to function at much higher rates than they are practically designed to do so and as such create spectacles of the most extraordinary enterprise decisions ever accounted in history (Dedre Gentner; Language in mind) and (Donald A.

Norman; Things that make us smart). In general we make a lot of decisions each day and to be fundamentally precise, every decision we make is either qualitative in nature i.e. corresponding to the nature of the outcome rather than the efficiency or quantitatively based on facts, figures and numbers, aiming at a higher percentage of the anticipated outcome. No matter whatever route we may use to conclude on an outcome all decisions made by man in the wake of the current perspective of things has one fundamental meaning and that, to achieve the set of goals that predefine the initial objective to utter and perfecting fulfillment.

The first practical example that we will encounter in this specific discussion is regarding the recognition prime decision model (RPD) that fundamentally focuses on decisions being made in environments that progress to account necessary at a second to second basis. The author (Gary A. Klein 1989) has taken a sample size of fifteen Fireground commanders that potentially embark on several retrieve and rescue missions whenever the surrounding vicinity of Brooklyn is witnessing a fire incident. By the counts of interviewing some of these fire ground commanders we have been led to know that on many or most occasions the decision as being a life and death one are done in less than a minute and correspond on anticipated outcome that is purely based on qualitative instinct and past experience, in other words it’s a fire ground commanders gut feeling.

The other example that we can take is from one of the famous works ‘Process descriptions of decision-making by Ola Swenson’; this research was specifically fueled by the University of Stockholm Sweden was to establish the protocol that embarks a personnel to carry out decision making when encountered with an economic enterprise problem. While the outcome of this study showcased that with the given time and resources, a financial based decision was thoroughly achieved with highlighted facts figures represented through many mathematical models such as histograms, bar graphs, benchmarking and Criteria matrix while other factors accounted for the quality of services the organization provided.

All in all it is a simple comprehensible fact that the prior cases mentioned in the latter discussion all follow a common theme of time at hand and the flexibility of decision required. Meaning to suggest that decision-making pertaining to a quantitative measure of data is directly proportional to the time available in making that particular choice plus the gravity of the decision with reference to the aftereffects witnessed may also is highly imperative. References: 1. Language in mind: advances in the study of language and thought By Dedre Gentner 2.

Things That Make Us Smart Defending Human Attributes in the Age of the Machine Book by: Donald A. Norman Presentation by: Stephanie Dawson, Allison Wyatt and Sharon Russell 3. A Recognition-Primed Decision (RPD) Model of Rapid Decision Making*, chapter 6; pg 138-147 Gary A. Klein. Klein Associates Inc. Fairborn, OH. 4. Process descriptions of decision-making by Ola Swenson. University of Stockholm Sweden